⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lou Schwartz”

District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004-01-21 · Published · cited 14× · 300 F. Supp. 2d 888; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1242; 2004 WL 117508
300 F.Supp.2d 888 (2004) UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. LOU FUSZ AUTOMOTIVE NETWORK, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 4:02CV1647 CDP. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. January 21, 2004. *889 *890 Roger J. Heidenreich, Sonnenschein and Nath, LLP, S
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987-04-28 · Published · cited 0× · 675 F. Supp. 635; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12789; 1987 WL 21708
ORDER MARCUS, District Judge. THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Rehearing of Order on Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, to Alter or Amend Judgment, which was filed with the Court on January 6, 1987. In its motion, Defendants allege that they are entitled to summary judgment' on Count I of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint on the following newly raised grounds: (1) Plaintiff
Schwartz v. Tedrickpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-03-24 · Published · cited 2× · 2016 Ohio 1218
[Cite as Schwartz v. Tedrick, 2016-Ohio-1218.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 102082 ANN T. SCHWARTZ, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES vs.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984-01-18 · Published · cited 0× · 443 So. 2d 504; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11334
PER CURIAM. This case arose as the result of a failed real estate transaction. The seller appeals alleging that the trial court abused its discretion when it entered a “stipulated” judgment, entertained a rehearing, withdrew the “stipulated” judgment, and entered a new final judgment diametrically opposed to the initial judgment. We reverse for a new trial. From her comments during the trial, it is obvious
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990-10-19 · Published · cited 2× · 917 F.2d 1537; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19937
PER CURIAM: Anna Lou Stuckey appeals from her convictions at the hands of a jury for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine (count one); for aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute cocaine (count two); and for aiding and abetting travel in interstate commerce in aid of racketeering (count thre
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 14, 2012 Session AEGIS SCIENCES CORPORATION v. LOU ANN ZELENIK, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 10C2913 Joseph P. Binkley, Jr., Judge No. M2012-00898-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 16, 2013 J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J., DISSENTING: I respectfully dissent from the m
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-08-14 · Published · cited 1× · 291 F. App'x 25
MEMORANDUM * Dr. Schwartz challenges the district court’s factual findings that: (1) surgery as not a substantial and material duty of his regular occupation at the time of his disability in 1993; (2) he is currently capable of performing knee arthroscopies at the rate of 1-2 per week; and (3) he was not under the regular care and attendance of a doctor during the time when he was receiving benefits. These f
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989-04-05 · Published · cited 1× · 868 F.2d 1547; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4577; 1989 WL 23806
MARKEY, Chief Judge: Ramma N.V. (Ramma), appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Doran Jason Company of Miami, Inc. (Jason) in Jason’s suit for breach of an oral contract. We affirm. BACKGROUND The facts of this case were explicated in the district court’s reported opinion accompanying its granting of Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-02-23 · Published · cited 546× · 595 F.3d 544; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3740; 2010 WL 624118
595 F.3d 544 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Glen THOMPSON, a/k/a Barry G. Thompson, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-4247. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 4, 2009. Decided: February 23, 2010. *545 ARGUED: Jonathan D. Byrne, Office of the Federal Public De
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-04-04 · Published · cited 213× · 403 F.3d 102; 66 Fed. R. Serv. 1104; 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1979; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5332
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Lou DiBella sued defendant Bernard Hopkins, a former business associate, for libel. DiBella alleged that Hopkins made four libelous statements about him. After a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York before Judge Denny Chin in November 2002, the plaintiff was awarded a substantial verdict based on
Schwartz v. DeLoachpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984-07-13 · Published · cited 13× · 453 So. 2d 454
453 So.2d 454 (1984) David SCHWARTZ, Gary Horwitz and Lou Horwitz, Petitioners, v. Walter William DeLOACH, Mary E. DeLoach, and Donald I. Roehr, Respondents. No. 84-793. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 13, 1984. Rehearing Denied July 31, 1984. Robert J. Gill of Harrell, Kokernak, Branning & Gill, P.A., Sarasota, for pe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988-05-03 · Published · cited 1× · 422 N.W.2d 761; 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 414; 1988 WL 40014
OPINION SCHUMACHER, Judge. Respondent’s driver’s license was revoked for driving while under the influence. He challenged the revocation, based in part upon the sufficiency of the basis for the initial stop of his vehicle. The referee recommended sustaining the revocation, but the district court rescinded the revocation. The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals. We affirm. FACTS <
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001-06-26 · Published · cited 23× · 256 Conn. 456; 774 A.2d 113; 2001 Conn. LEXIS 225
*459 Opinion VERTEFEUILLE, J. This case involves a claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act, General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. (act). The defendant1 second injury fund (fund) raises the following issues on appeal from a ruling of the compensation review board (board):2 (1) whether the
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993-04-06 · Published · cited 3× · 501 N.W.2d 259; 199 Mich. App. 241
199 Mich. App. 241 (1993) 501 N.W.2d 259 SCOTT v. HENRY FORD HOSPITAL Docket No. 132892. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted October 21, 1992, at Detroit. Decided April 6, 1993, at 9:05 A.M. Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz, P.C. (by Richard D. Fox), for the plaintiff. Kitch, Saurbier, Drutcha
Martin v. Ellandsonpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2000-10-16 · Published · cited 2× · 122 F. Supp. 2d 1017; 2000 WL 1763075
122 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2000) Charles Reno MARTIN, Steven R. Wycoff, and Glendale More, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Nolan ELLANDSON, and Lou V. Brewer, Defendants, United States of America, Intervenor. No. 4-73-cv-10229. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. October 16, 2000. *1018 Barbara A. Schwartz, John B. Whisto
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-08-03 · Published · cited 9× · 865 F.3d 1322; 2017 WL 3301353; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14261; 130 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 521
Case: 15-15260 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 1 of 15 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-15260 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cv-61959-RNS ZENOVIDA LOVE, et al.,
District Court, S.D. California · 1999-01-28 · Published · cited 5× · 39 F. Supp. 2d 1235; 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21189; 48 ERC (BNA) 1399; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3293; 1999 WL 155914
39 F.Supp.2d 1235 (1999) NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL; San Diego Baykeeper; Kenneth J. Moser, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHWEST MARINE, INC., Defendant. No. 96-CV-1492-B(AJB). United States District Court, S.D. California. January 28, 1999. *1236 Charles S. Crandell, Law Office of Charles S. Crandell, San Diego, Cal., Joel R. Reynold
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993-05-10 · Published · cited 36× · 852 S.W.2d 799; 313 Ark. 145; 1993 Ark. LEXIS 283
852 S.W.2d 799 (1993) 313 Ark. 145 Doyle REYNOLDS and Alma Lou Reynolds, Appellants, v. SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Wayne Scoggins, Appellees. No. 92-1266. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 10, 1993. *800 Holly Smith, Lewis Jones, Fayetteville, for appellants. James M. Roy, Jr., Springdale, fo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-09-19 · Published · cited 13× · 230 F.3d 109; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23471; 2000 WL 1345930
Vacated and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge TRAXLER joined. OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge: Marlon Dewayne Dixon appeals the district court’s order sentencing him to 63 months incarceration. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the sentencing
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998-02-17 · Published · cited 1× · 994 F. Supp. 942; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3240; 1998 WL 89288
994 F.Supp. 942 (1998) Romell GIDDENS, Plaintiff, v. STEAK AND ALE OF ILLINOIS, INC., Steak and Ale of Illinois, Inc. d/b/a Bennigan's, Michael Hoffer, William Sorenson, Don Holly, Christopher Robertson, and Rob Auw, Defendants. No. 97 C 3101. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 17, 1998. *943