Cases

175 F.Supp.2d 532 (2001) UNITED STATES of America v. Ronald Eugene GIBSON a/k/a "Santino Gibson," a/k/a "Sonny Gibson," and Reparata Mazzola, a/k/a "Lorraine Adele," Defendants. No. 99 CR 935 RCC. United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 1, 2001. *533 Richard Owens, Assistant United States Attorney, Mary Jo White, United

WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge To people of a certain age, who grew up in the America of the 1960s and 70s - where television meant three channels and shows like Bonanza, Star Trek, and The Art Linkletter Show (more on that to come); where cars were made in America, period; and where phones were connected to wires, not cell towers - the Game of Life was a gangbuster hit found (it seemed) in every household

430 A.2d 37 (1981) Warren W. LIBBY v. Mary Merrill LORRAIN et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued May 4, 1981. Decided May 28, 1981. *38 Bowie & Matthews, Kim Matthews, Portland (orally), for plaintiff. Allison Morrill, Portland (orally), for Mary Merrill. Kenneth Cole, Portland, for defendant. Be

Baylson, J. I. Nature of this Action This action, whose lengthy proceedings have been summarized in many prior opinions in this case, is a challenge to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2257 and 2257A, and their implementing regulations, 28 C.F.R. 75 et seq. , by numerous Plaintiffs invol

Rel: March 24, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0066p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ ┐ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, │

By Judge Robert J. Smith This matter came before the Court on the Petition for Aid and Direction filed by Kenneth Labowitz as the Administrator of the Estate of Gladys Floyd, deceased. The petition seeks the approval of a plan of distribution for the proceeds of the Estate of Gladys Floyd, who died intestate on September 18, 2007. This case presents the question of how proceeds from an estate are to be dist

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2056 G. G., by his next friend and mother, Deirdre Grimm, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. ------------------------ JUDY CHIASSON, Ph. D., School Administrator California; DAVID VANNASDALL, School Administrator California; DIANA K. BRUCE,

COLE, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in the majority opinion, but write separately because I would also grant Dixon’s petition on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. I. At the penalty phase, Dixon’s counsel presented as “mitigating evidence” the testimony of an employee of the Bureau of Sentence Computation for the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corr

DATE: 03/13/2017 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:23:09 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312016 GROUP 2, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________

THOMPSON, District Judge. Upon the libel of the United States, the Lorraine Rita was seized upon the high seas while engaged in transporting intoxicating liquor. It is charged that she is subject to seizure and forfeiture under section 4337, R. S. (Comp. St. § 8086), in that, being an American documented vessel, she proceeded on a foreign voyage without first giving up her enrollment and license to the collector of the Port of N

Chief Judge Peter G. Cary. *21This case examines the permanence of an exemption claim in proceeds resulting from the sale of the debtor's homestead in a converted chapter 7 case in a jurisdiction with a temporal limit to its homestead proceeds exemption, also known as a "vanishing" exemption. The applicable exemption for Maine debtors who seek to

763 So.2d 491 (2000) Howard H. SCHLITT, Appellant, v. Richard L. CURRIER, Jr., and Lorraine Carol Schlitt, Successor Trustees and Beneficiaries of the Nancy Schlitt Trust, Thomas D. Currier, Kathie J. Currier, Andrea Lynne Schlitt, and Cynthia Lee Lafebvre, Beneficiaries, Appellees. Nos. 4D98-1466, 4D98-2510. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 12, 2000.<

2025 IL App (1st) 231132 FIFTH DIVISION February 28, 2025 No. 1-23-1132 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT Appeal from the Circ

KEARSE, Circuit Judge. The United States of America (the “Government”), an intervenor in this enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against defendants Credit Bancorp, Ltd., and its affiliated entities (collectively “Credit Bancorp” “Bancorp” or “CBL”), appeals from so much of a May 16, 2001 order (“May 2001 Order”) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New Yor

14-3800-cv Lowinger v. Morgan Stanley 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2014 6 7 (Argued: May 15, 2015 Decided: November 3, 2016) 8 9 Docket No. 14-3800-cv 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 12 ROBERT LOWINGER, 13 14 Plaintiff-Appellan

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of the petition for rehearing: Bodily privacy is historically one of the most basic elements of human dignity and individual freedom. And forcing a person of one biological sex to be exposed to persons of the opposite biological sex profoundly offends this dignity and freedom. Have we not universally condemned as inhumane such forced exposure throughout histor

172 F.3d 238 133 Ed. Law Rep. 748 RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATIONv.N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an infant; Mary E.,Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., aninfant, Defendants/Third-party Plaintiffs,v.Frederick Stokley, Superintendent; John Campion, Directorof Special Programs; Charles Abate, Principal; WilliamWard, Principal; Lorraine Zak, Psychologist; KathleenMcN

407 F.3d 546 Roderick CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.GENERAL DYNAMICS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Richard T. Schnorbus, Defendants, Appellants. No. 04-1828. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard January 4, 2005. Decided May 23, 2005. Arthur G. Telegen, with whom Claud

"Adoption statutes are intended to benefit children in need of a home and parental care by providing for creation of a status substantially equivalent to that of parent and child. ". . . . "In order to fulfill their duty to children within their respective borders, especially those in need of homes, and promote the general welfare of children, states have enacted statutes designed to regulate the creation of the closest conceivable counterpart of the relat