⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lori L Jones”

Idaho Supreme Court · 2016-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 160 Idaho 344; 372 P.3d 399; 2016 Ida. LEXIS 162
J. JONES, Chief Justice Appellant Lori Ann Wilsdn was divorced from respondent David Wayne King in Colorado in 2003. The divorce decree specified that Wilson was entitled to part of King’s military pension. King began 'receiving military pension payments in 2013 but has not paid Wilson her decreed share of those payments. Wilson sued King in Idaho, seeking an order establishing
Jones v. Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 2519; 206 L. Ed. 2d 469
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jones v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 849
Per Curiam. The appellant appeals the trial court's order imposing restitution in the amount of $3,228.52. We affirm the trial court's finding that it had jurisdiction without comment, but write only to address the appellant's challenge of the amount of restitution ordered. The appellant claims the trial court's award was not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Given his arguments on this issue and the Stat
Jones v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 849
Per Curiam. The appellant appeals the trial court's order imposing restitution in the amount of $3,228.52. We affirm the trial court's finding that it had jurisdiction without comment, but write only to address the appellant's challenge of the amount of restitution ordered. The appellant claims the trial court's award was not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Given his arguments on this issue and the Stat
Jones v. Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 795; 202 L. Ed. 2d 587
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009-04-03 · Published · cited 9× · 288 Kan. 477; 204 P.3d 617; 2009 Kan. LEXIS 70
The opinion of the court was delivered by JOHNSON, J.: Jerome S. Tilzer, individually and as plaintiff ad litem for Rita Tilzer, Todd A. Tilzer, and Jill Jokelson (hereafter collectively referred to as Tilzers) appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Grant L. Davis and Davis, Bethune & Jones, LLC (hereafter collectively referred to as Davis), in this legal malpractice action. Til
Jones v. Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 138 S. Ct. 426; 199 L. Ed. 2d 316
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jones v. Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 138 S. Ct. 425; 199 L. Ed. 2d 316
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jones v. Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-05-30 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 2188; 198 L. Ed. 2d 258
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-03-10 · Published · cited 1× · 72 N.E.3d 472; 2017 WL 943970; 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 108
Crone, Judge; Case Summary For the third time, this matter comes before us for review. Imre L. Falatovics (“Husband”) and Amy L. Falatovics (“Wife”) were divorced. Following the issuance of the dissolution decree, Wife filed an appeal and Husband filed an Indiana Trial Rule 60(B) motion (“Trial Rule 60(B) Motion”) to set aside the dissolution decree. Aft
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2022-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., GOBEIL and PINSON, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
Arizona Supreme Court · 2019-01-02 · Published · cited 0× · 431 P.3d 1197
JUSTICE GOULD, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 We hold that Arizona's automatic assignment provision in A.R.S. § 23-1023(B) does not apply when an employee receives workers' compensation benefits under another state's laws. Rather, the law of the state in which an employee's workers' compensation is paid determines the assignment rights of the employer and employee.
In Re Jonespublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009-10-27 · Published · cited 208× · 777 N.W.2d 728; 286 Mich. App. 126
777 N.W.2d 728 (2009) 286 Mich. App. 126 In re JONES. Docket No. 290194. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted August 5, 2009, at Grand Rapids. Decided October 27, 2009, at 9:15 a.m. *729 Lori L. Canfield for Jasmine Jouvaughn McCoy. Before: OWENS, P.J., and TALBOT and GLEICHER, JJ. <
California Court of Appeal · 2007-03-23 · Published · cited 2× · 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 351; 148 Cal. App. 4th 1130; 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3077; 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3867; 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 415
56 Cal.Rptr.3d 351 (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 1130 LORI RUBINSTEIN PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PTPN, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B187172. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Four. March 23, 2007. *352 The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consu
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-05-15 · Published · cited 11× · 890 F.3d 559
PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: Shelton Denoria Jones's petition for panel rehearing is denied. The panel's prior opinion, issued March 27, 2018, is withdrawn. This opinion is substituted in its place. Jones was convicted of the capital murder of a police officer and sentenced to death in Texas state court. Jones asserts he is entitled to federal habeas relief on
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2018-10-05 · Published · cited 10× · 350 F. Supp. 3d 489
James P. Jones, United States District Judge The plaintiff in this action, Christopher Earl Snipes, asserts claims against defendant The Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority ("Jail Authority"), his former employer, alleging that the Jail Authority violated the Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") by interfering with his FMLA rights and retaliating against him for exercising these rights. The Jail Authority has moved to dismiss Sn
State v. Jonespublic domain
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009-09-10 · Published · cited 41× · 772 N.W.2d 496; 2009 Minn. LEXIS 598; 2009 WL 2878113
772 N.W.2d 496 (2009) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Don JONES, Appellant. No. A07-1168. Supreme Court of Minnesota. September 10, 2009. *499 Jodie L. Carlson, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, MN, for appellant. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, and Patrick J. Ciliberto, Scott County Attorney, Tod
Jones v. Murraypublic domain
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2004-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 18 Mass. L. Rptr. 188
Carhart, J. The plaintiff, Lori-Ann Jones (Jones), pro se, filed this action pursuant to G.L.c. 40A, §17, on April 16, 2004, seeking judicial review of a decision of the defendant, City of Westfield Zoning Board of Appeals (the ZBA) affirming a decision of the defendant, Donald York (York), Building Commissioner of the Ciiy of Westfield. The defendants now move to dismiss Jones’ complaint for failure to state a short, pl
State v. Jonespublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008-09-02 · Published · cited 4× · 755 N.W.2d 341; 2008 Minn. App. LEXIS 347; 2008 WL 4006699
755 N.W.2d 341 (2008) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Don JONES, Appellant. No. A07-1168. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. September 2, 2008. *344 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN and Patrick J. Ciliberto, Scott County Attorney, Todd P. Zettler, Assistant County Attorney, Shakopee, MN, for respondent. Lawrence
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-01-31 · Published · cited 1× · 70 N.E.3d 828; 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 38; 2017 WL 405759
Crone, Judge. Case Summary Russell F. Dumka appeals from the trial court’s order denying garnishment of an individual retirement account inherited by Lori Erickson from her husband. Although he concedes that the asset is exempt from garnishment, he argues that the trial court erred by applying the statutory exemption because it was Lori’s burden to asser