Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2021 Decided May 17, 2022 No. 20-5151 LORI MARINO, PH.D., ET AL., APPELLANTS WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION, APPELLEE v. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from th

281 S.C. 440 (1984) 316 S.E.2d 367 The STATE, Respondent, v. Harold DREW, H.G. Tyler, and W.G. Fowler, of whom H.G. Tyler and W.G. Fowler are, Appellants. 22092 Supreme Court of South Carolina. May 1, 1984. *441 Kay Gorenflo Hearn of Stevens, Stevens, Thomas, Hearn & Hearn, Loris, and

DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S F.R.CRIM.P. 29(c) MOTION GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case raises the issue of whether (and/or when will) violations of an Internet website’s1 terms of service constitute a crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030. Originally, the question arose in the context of Defendant

OPINION KIRK, Judge Appellant challenges his convictions of ineligible person in possession of a firearm and terroristic threats. He argues that the district court: (1) abused its discretion in denying his motion to sequester the jury during deliberations; (2) committed plain error by admitting the victim’s statement to officers that he saw appellant wit

OPINION WINTHROP, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 Before a public entity properly can be sued for damages, a notice of claim that complies in all respects with Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-821.011 first must be served. Pertinent to this appeal, the statute requires the claimant to provide a sum-certain offer that, if accepted, will settle the claim. In this opinion, we

Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge A public school officer in the Katy Independent School District's police department tased and handcuffed J.W., a 17-year-old special-education student. His mother, Lori Washington, sued the Katy Independent School District and School Resource Officer Elvin Paley for violating of J.W.'s federally protected rights. (Docket Entry Nos. 1, 12). After discovery, the Katy School District

FILED JAN 18 2023 ORDERED PUBLISHED SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

Karen King Mitchell, Judge Jesse and Lori England, formerly husband and wife, cross-appeal various portions of the trial court’s distribution of marital assets in its judgment of dissolution. Finding no error, we affirm. Facts 1 Husband and Wife were married in 2003. At tha

OPINION Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, Holly Kirby, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. Kevin E. Trent pled guilty to one count of vehicular homicide by intoxication. He was s

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Lori A. Mosby, an African-American attorney from Arkansas, appeals from the dismissal of her complaint against Stark Ligón, Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, and seven Justices of the Arkansas Supreme Court. Mosby alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 relating to the disciplinary processes of t

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PATIENT DEPOT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellant, v. ACADIA ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida corporation, RYAN O’CONNOR, and LORI ANN O’CONNOR, Appellees. No. 4D21-1934 [April 26, 2023] Appeal from

DEARIE, District Judge This insurance coverage dispute arises in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy and involves damage sustained by a shopping center during the storm. Defendants Continental Casualty Company ("Continental") and Chubb Custom Insurance Company ("Chubb") denied coverage. The owner of the shopping center, 7001 E. 71st Street LLC, sues for breach of the insurance policies. Defendants move for summary judgment. The Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Plaintiff Joshua Munroe was employed as a driver for a trucking company when he was involved in a serious accident. He and his wife were covered under the company’s insurance policy for the tractor-trailer that he was operating. The Mun-roes brought suit against the truck drivers that were responsible for the accident and their employer,

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. Because petitioner is a religious organization utilizing the subject property to further the religious purposes for which it was organized, petitioner is entitled to a real property tax exemption for the property (see RPTL 420-a [1] [a]). The Town has not demonstrated an existin

978 S.W.2d 386 (1998) A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John R. DREW and the Daniel and Henry Company, Defendants/Appellants. No. 72707. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. July 31, 1998. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied September 30, 1998. Application for Transfer Denied November 24, 1998

EAGLES, Chief Judge. Petitioners appeal from an order affirming a decision by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Oxford to issue a Special Use Permit to respondents David Drye Company (“Drye Co.”) and Mr. and Mrs. Franklin Hancock, IV. Petitioners assert three arguments on appeal: (1) that respondents did not make a prima facie showing that its application met the requirements for issuance of a permit; (2) that

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

Cite as 2026 Ark. 53 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-25-11 Opinion Delivered: March 12, 2026 BENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; LORI BACON, IN HER INDIVIDUAL AND APPEAL FROM THE SALINE OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND LITA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT GATTIS, IN HER INDIVIDUAL AND [NO. 63CV-20-522] OFFICIAL CAPACITY

LOLLEY, J. 11 Aakal Lodging, L.L.C. (“Aakal”) appeals the judgment of the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Bossier, State of Louisiana, wherein the trial court dismissed Aakal’s claim against American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“Amex”) and BA Merchant Services, L.L.C. (“BA Merchant”). For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgments. FACTS

939 P.2d 475 (1997) Jose A. PADILLA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.E. FREY & COMPANY, INC., D.E. Frey Group, Inc., and Dale E. Frey, Defendants-Appellants. No. 96CA0616. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. April 3, 1997. Rehearing Denied May 8, 1997. *476 Berryhill, Cage & North, P.C., Jack W. Berryhill, Lori