⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Loretta L. Jones”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-11-22 · Published · cited 4× · 842 F.3d 506; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21013; 2016 WL 6882835
BAUER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Miguel Perez-Fuentes, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the denial of his application for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). The Board affirmed the denial based on the Immigration Judge’s alternate determination that Perez-Fuentes did not establis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-06-17 · Published · cited 3× · 789 F.3d 1049; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10174; 2015 WL 3756470
OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether “unlawful laser activity” under state law is a crime involving moral turpitude. *1051 I On September 1, 2006, John Coquico, a' citizen of the Philippines, was convict
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 816 S.E.2d 679
Ray, Judge. *680After Barrett Jones was injured in a single-car accident on State Route 42 in Monroe County on December 24, 2014, he sued the Georgia Department of Transportation ("GDOT"). He claimed, inter alia, that GDOT's improper maintenance of the roadway led to an accumulation of water which caused his truck to hydroplane into a tree, sev
Shekhawat v. Jonespublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013-07-11 · Published · cited 47× · 293 Ga. 468; 746 S.E.2d 89; 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2198; 2013 WL 3475325; 2013 Ga. LEXIS 608
THOMPSON, Presiding Justice, concurring specially. Although I agree with much of what is said in the majority opinion, I write separately because I see no need to overrule Keenan v. Plouffe, 267 Ga. 791 (482 SE2d 253) (1997). Simplyput, while much of the discussion in Keenan strayed from a proper analysis of official immunity under OCGA § 50-21-25(a),its holding canbe limited to its facts,
Jones v. Kellypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-08-05 · Published · cited 0× · 611 F. App'x 229
PER CURIAM: * La Tidtus Jones, Mississippi prisoner # 162333, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) following the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. Jones asserted several constitutional violations after he was allegedly barred from visiting the clerk of court’s office where his girlfriend worked. By moving to appeal IFP, Jone
Jones v. Westpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2006-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 421 F. Supp. 2d 615; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29279; 2006 WL 727876
421 F.Supp.2d 615 (2006) Wendyll L. JONES, Petitioner, v. Calvin WEST, Respondent. No. 03 CV 6263. United States District Court, W.D. New York. March 23, 2006. *616 *617 Wendyll L. Jones, Attica, NY, Pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Rochester, NY, f
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 97 F.3d 1121; 78 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6713; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26599
HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Terry L. Jones and Patricia K. Jones appeal the dismissal of their suit against the United States for the disclosure of return information by an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent to a confidential informant that resulted in damage to their business. The district court held that the disclosure violated 26 U.S.C. § 6103 and did not fall under any statut
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-08-29 · Published · cited 8× · 902 F.3d 461
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: A stream of litigation followed a marine accident that resulted in damages estimated to exceed $60 million. The underlying fault or liability for that accident is not at issue on appeal. Rather, Valero, Shell, and Motiva ask this court to resolve whether the excess insurers of one of the involved vessels may limit their liability to that of the insured ve
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 548 F. App'x 216
PER CURIAM: * The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, record excerpts, and pertinent parts of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact and AFFIRM essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that th
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-12-02 · Published · cited 21× · 751 F. Supp. 2d 628
751 F.Supp.2d 628 (2010) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. BLOOMBERG L.P., Defendant. Jill Patricot, Tanys Lancaster, Janet Loures, Monica Prestia, Marina Kushnir and Maria Mandalakis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. Bloomberg L.P., Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 8383 (LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 25, 2010. Opin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-07-29 · Published · cited 2× · 183 F.3d 909; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17917; 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5386; 1999 WL 549139
MAGILL, Circuit Judge. John L. Brassard, a limited partner in a partnership, appeals from the district court’s 1 order denying his request to readjust the partnership’s 1983 income tax return to reflect a tax credit for expenses related to the rehabilitation of a historic building. We affirm. I.
Jones v. Gmri, Inc.public domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 355 N.C. 275; 2002 N.C. LEXIS 183; 559 S.E.2d 787
PER CURIAM. WRIT OF CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Jones v. GMRI, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001-07-03 · Published · cited 11× · 551 S.E.2d 867; 144 N.C. App. 558; 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 533
551 S.E.2d 867 (2001) Loretta JONES and Michael Jones, Plaintiffs, v. GMRI, INC. and Rich Products Corporation, Inc., Defendants. No. COA00-831. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 3, 2001. *869 Crews & Klein, P.C. by Paul I. Klein and Katherine Freeman, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellants. Dean & Gibson, L.L.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-07-21 · Published · cited 156× · 5 F.4th 511
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2213 LORENZO M. PLEDGER, SR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LORETTA LYNCH; CHARLES SAMUELS, JR; J.F. CARAWAY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MR. WEAVER; MRS. GROVE; E. ANDERSON; NURSE JOSHUA HALL; ALICIA WILSON; ANDREA HALL; ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL, Defe
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-07-18 · Published · cited 1× · 830 F.3d 179; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13126; 2016 WL 3900677
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: An Immigration Judge ordered that Petitioner Orlando Gutierrez be removed from the United States.1 Gutierrez appealed the Immigration Judge’s removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which dismissed the appeal. Gutierrez now petitions this Court for review of the BIA’s order. He claims that he is not subject to removal because
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-10-28 · Published · cited 2× · 805 F.3d 185; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18794; 2015 WL 6657575
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 28, 2015 No. 14-60183
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2024-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales and Raphael PUBLISHED Argued at Norfolk, Virginia TINA C. RODRIGUE, M.D., ET AL. OPINION v. Record No. 1521-22-1 JUDGE STUART A. RAPHAEL
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case Nos. 6D2023-0882, 6D2023-2147 CONSOLIDATED Lower Tribunal No. 16-CP-1243 _____________________________ LANCE MCKINNEY, ESQ., as Curator of the ESTATE OF ADELAIDE TUNNELL, Appellant,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006-07-31 · Published · cited 37× · 457 F.3d 1174; 38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1829; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19161; 2006 WL 2097075
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: The questions presented in this appeal are (1) whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) completely preempts state law claims seeking damages for breach of contract, lost health insurance benefits, failure to notify that an ERISA plan had lapsed and premium payments for losses incurred
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued April 18, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00122-CV ——————————— LORETTA CUBA, Appellant V. OLIVIA EVONNE WIL