Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lorena Arce”
In re: Edmundo Ayala Oquendopublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2025 TSPR 9 Edmundo Ayala Oquendo (TS-8,072) 215 DPR ___ Número del Caso: CP-2020-0019 (AB-2019-0135) Fecha: 23 de enero de 2025 Oficina del Procurador General: Lcda. Lorena Cortés Rivera Subprocuradora General Lcda. Mabel Sotomayor Hernández Subprocuradora General Lcda. Minnie H. Rodrígu
Von Holdt v. A-1 Tool Corp.public domain
636 F.Supp.2d 726 (2009) John W. VON HOLDT, Jr, Janice Anderson and Plas-Tool Co., Plaintiffs, v. A-1 TOOL CORPORATION, Triangle Tool Corporation, Alfonso Arciniegas, Geoffrey Luther, and Leroy Luther, Defendants. No. 04-C-4123. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 19, 2009. *728 Donald A. Tarkingto
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00224-CV ___________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.W. AND A.W., Children On Appeal from the 325th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 325-674489-19 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Wallach and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth
In Re: José M. Colón Ortizpublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2020 TSPR 57 José M. Colón Ortiz 204 DPR _____ Número del Caso: CP-2017-4 (TS-10,167) Fecha: 15 de julio de 2020 Abogados del querellado: Lcdo. Guillermo Figueroa Prieto Lcdo. Mario A. Rodríguez Torres Oficina del Procurador General: Lcdo. Joseph Feldstien Del Valle
In Re: Héctor A. Lugo Quiñonespublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2021 TSPR 02 Héctor A. Lugo Quiñones 205 DPR _____ (TS-7137) Número del Caso: CP-2017-14 Fecha: 12 de enero de 2021 Oficina del Procurador General: Lcdo. Isaías Sánchez Báez Procurador General Lcdo. Joseph G. Feldstein Del Valle Subprocurador General Lcda. Lorena Cortés Rive
Rochkind v. Stevensonpublic domain
Opinion by Adkins, J. We have often said that when it comes to expert testimony, trial court judges protect juries from “junk science” and other unsupported scientific conclusions. But in the complex field of behavioral disorders, the task of determining whether causation testimony rests on sound science is frau
John J. Rogers, Jr. James R. Winton and Burl Richardson v. Texas Board of Architectural Examinerspublic domain
OPINION J. WOODFIN JONES, Chief Justice. The principal issue in this administrative appeal is the extent to which engineers licensed under Texas’s Engineering Practice Act, Tex. Occ.Code Ann. §§ 1001.001-.604 (West 2004 & Supp. 2010), are exempt from the provisions of the Architecture Practice Act, Tex. Occ.Code Ann. §§ 1051.001-801 (Wes
John J. Rogers, Jr. James R. Winton and Burl Richardson v. Texas Board of Architectural Examinerspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00182-CV John J. Rogers, Jr.; James R. Winton and Burl Richardson, Appellants v. Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-08-004634, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING
1 2024 CO 67 Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc. and Jack Phillips, Petitioners v. Autumn Scardina, Respondent No. 23SC116Supreme Court of Colorado, En BancOctober 8, 2024 Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Case No. 21CA1142
In re Estate of Nunupublic domain
Tracy Christopher, Justice In this appeal, an estate's beneficiary seeks reversal of (a) the trial court's ruling that the beneficiary has no claim for forfeiture of opposing counsel's attorneys' fees, (b) the trial court's assumed denial of the beneficiary's challenge to the independent executor's entitlement to use estate funds to pay her attorneys' fees and expenses in this case, (c) the denial of the beneficiary's application to
Beltran v. Dexterpublic domain
(2008) Jose BELTRAN, Petitioner, v. D. DEXTER, Warden, et al., Respondents. No. CV 07-6614-R(RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 17, 2008. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MANUEL L. REAL, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and ot
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Taylor v. Statepublic domain
937 So.2d 590 (2006) William TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. SC04-2243. Supreme Court of Florida. June 29, 2006. *592 Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea M. Norgard, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, T
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-1339 _____________ ROSA ELIDA CASTRO; A.A.G.C.; LAURA LISSETH FLORES-PICHINTE; E.S.U.F.; KAREN MARGARITA ZELAYA ALBERTO; S.E.A.Z; KELLY GUTIERREZ RUBIO; G.J.S.G.; GLADIS CARRASCO GOMEZ; B.J.R.C.; WENDY AMPARO OSORIO MARTINEZ; D.S.R.O.; CARMEN LEIVA-MENJIVAR; E.A.M.L.; A.M.M.L.; DINA ISAB
Rochkind v. Stevensonpublic domain
*429 Deborah S. Eyler, J. In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Starlena Stevenson sued S&S Partnership (“S&S”), Stanley Rochkind, and Dear Management & Construction Company (“Dear”) for negligence and violations of the Consumer Protection Act
Fonseca v. Hallpublic domain
(2008) Francisco FONSECA, Petitioner, v. James E. HALL, et al., Corrections, Respondents. No. CV 04-5836-CJC (RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 18, 2008. ORDER ADOPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has rev
People v. Gonzalespublic domain
Opinion CORRIGAN, J. Defendant Ivan Joe Gonzales was convicted of murdering Genny Rojas. 1 The jury found as a special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction of torture. 2 However, it was unable to reach a p
Shepard v. Shepardpublic domain
Lawrence, J. On the 9th day of October, 1852, John Shepard, who is the common source of title to the premises in question, being- about to marry Frances hi. Parmalee, conveyed said premises to Thomas hlcFarhn, “ upon the trust,” nevertheless, “ and to and for the uses, interests and purposes hereinafter limited, described and declared. That is- to say, upon trust to receive the issues, rents and profits of said
O'grady, Shane Timothypublic domain
,~uise Pearson Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals § Ex.Parte Shane T. O'Grady P.O. Box 12.:308 § RE: Cause No. 58863 capitol Station § 412th Judicial Court Austin, Texas 78711 § § Dear Clerk, at this time I find it necessary to request your assistance to the following. ·Now comes Shane T. O'Grady in Cause No. 58863