⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lopez v. Mortgage Electronic, Registration Systems As Nominee”

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-01-03 · Published · cited 3× · 486 B.R. 221; 2013 WL 49815; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 19
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge. There are two matters before the Court: (1) a “Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay” (the “Motion for Relief’) filed by Consumer Solutions REO, LLC (“Consumer REO”); and (2) a “Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56” (the “Summary Judgment Motion”) filed by defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“ME
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014-02-13 · Published · cited 64× · 467 Mass. 160
Duffly, J. We address in this case whether the plaintiffs and others who had appeals pending in the Appeals Court when we decided Eaton v. Federal Nat’l Mtge. Ass’n, 462 Mass. 569, 569 (2012) (Eaton), may pursue claims seeking to invalidate foreclosure proceedings based on our decision in that case.3 We held in Eaton that a foreclosure by power of sale pursuant to G
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2011-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
02-10-169-CV COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF
District Court, D. Arizona · 2010-09-30 · Published · cited 2× · 744 F. Supp. 2d 1018; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106345; 2010 WL 4038788
744 F.Supp.2d 1018 (2010) In re MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS (MERS) LITIGATION. This Order Applies to: CV 09-2616-PHX-JAT CV 10-78-PHX-JAT CV 10-79-PHX-JAT CV 10-80-PHX-JAT CV 10-81-PHX-JAT CV 10-630-PHX-JAT. MDL Docket No. 09-2119-JAT. United States District Court, D. Arizona. September 30, 2010. *1020 ORDER
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2011-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00169-CV MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC APPELLANT REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. V. MARK DISANTI APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT O
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009-12-07 · Published · cited 25× · 659 F. Supp. 2d 1368; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116273; 2009 WL 4755688
659 F.Supp.2d 1368 (2009) In re: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS (MERS) LITIGATION. MDL No. 2119. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. December 7, 2009. *1369 Before ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Acting Chairman, JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman[*], KATHRYN H. VRATIL[*], DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL
Idaho Supreme Court · 2010-06-25 · Published · cited 12× · 149 Idaho 603; 238 P.3d 203; 2010 Ida. LEXIS 110
EISMANN, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien because: (a) the notice of lien did not substantially comply with the requirements of Idaho Code § 45-507, and (b) the construction contract was void because the contractor had not registered under the Idaho Contractor Regis
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011-09-29 · Published · cited 32× · 821 F. Supp. 2d 423; 2011 WL 5223349
821 F.Supp.2d 423 (2011) Marilene O. ROSA and Adamacio De Souza Oliveira, Plaintiffs, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-12141-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 29, 2011. *425 Jonathan E. Babcock, Alliance for Hope Networks, Inc., Framingham, MA, Shanna
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2021-10-25 · Published · cited 23× · 150 Haw. 91; 497 P.3d 106
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 25-OCT-2021 08:41 AM
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2022-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 151 Haw. 327; 511 P.3d 826
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 28-JUN-2022 07:45 AM Dkt. 80 MO
In Re Lopezpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011-02-09 · Published · cited 12× · 446 B.R. 12; 65 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 61; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 476; 2011 WL 576820
446 B.R. 12 (2011) In re Henry LOPEZ, Debtor. No. 09-10346-WCH. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Eastern Division. February 9, 2011. *13 Elaine M. Benkoski, Dedham, MA, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The matt
District Court, E.D. California · 2014-02-18 · Published · cited 36× · 997 F. Supp. 2d 1088; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20772; 2014 WL 641097
ORDER TO DISMISS CERTAIN DEFENDANTS AND JUDGMENT THEREON (Doc. 5.) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL Judges in the Eastern District of California carry the heaviest caseload in the nation, and this Court is unable to devote inordinate time and resources to individual cases and matters. This Court must best manage its voluminou
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-06-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00011-CV 5753278 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000254 SCWC-15-0000254 30-SEP-2015 11:18 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO JP MORGAN
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000254 15-SEP-2015 07:50 AM SCWC-15-0000254 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FORMERLY K
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-06-12 · Published · cited 78× · 754 F.3d 772; 2014 WL 2611314; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10934
OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), a subsidiary of MERSCORP, Inc., operates an electronic mortgage registration system (“the MERS System”). MERS is distinct from the MERS System. The MERS System is a private electronic database that records the ownership of and servicing rights in home loans. Various
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011-10-14 · Published · cited 1× · 823 F. Supp. 2d 1061; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118956; 2011 WL 4899935
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; AND (2) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge. On October 13, 2011, the Court heard Defendants BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (“BAC”), Bank of America (“BOA”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s (“MERS”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #47) and Defendant Security National Mort
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013-12-31 · Published · cited 1× · 990 F. Supp. 2d 1042; 2013 WL 6894453; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181584
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART REMAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT DERRICK K. WATSON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are the following motions: (1) Defendant Federal Housing Fi
District Court, E.D. California · 2009-12-03 · Published · cited 28× · 687 F. Supp. 2d 1191; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119241; 2009 WL 4640673
687 F.Supp.2d 1191 (2009) Cesar CASTANEDA and Suzzanne Castaneda, Plaintiffs, v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., Novastar Mortgage, Inc., Quality Loan Service Corp., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Synergy Financial Management dba Direct Lender.Com, Louis Leon Pacific, Michael Timoshuck, Ivette Campos, and Does 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. No. CIV. 2:09-01124 WBS DAD. United States Distr
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012-11-26 · Published · cited 26× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 1178; 2012 WL 6004176; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170875
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) ■ the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation and Certification of Class for Settlement Purposes, filed July 23, 2012 (Doc. 391)(“Motion for Final Approval”); and (ii) Co-Lead Counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and Memo