Cases

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. In March 2012, Lourdes del Rosario Fontanillas-Lopez (“Fontanillas”) filed sex discrimination claims under federal and Puerto Rico law against her former employer, Morell Bauzá Cartagena & Dape-na, LLC (“MBCD”), and several individual *53 defendants. Following discovery, the

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0238p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

NOONAN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the opinion of the court and add two points: First. Social Security recipients would almost certainly be denied overdraft privileges if Plaintiffs prevailed. No bank would be willing to become vulnerable to class action suits because it paid overdrafts and then reimbursed itself from the deposit of a Social Security check. Under Plain

NOONAN, Circuit Judge, concurring. The opinion of the court is faithful to the Social Security Act and the relevant precedents. Recipients of Social Security who depend on their checks for necessities are protected. Who could dissent? Nonetheless, this fidelity to the law produces a result that is not happy. As Judge Trott observed in an analogous case, Crawford v. Gould, 56 F.3d 1162, 1169 (9th C

ORDER The Opinion filed on August 6, 2002, and appearing at 302 F.3d 900 (9th Cir.2002), is amended as follows: At page 905, second column, first full paragraph, the second sentence that reads “Prison inmates do not voluntarily open accounts with the prison, do not have the option of receiving their benefits directly and do not voluntarily execute contractual agreements regarding how overdrafts will be treated” is

OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. On March 8, 2002, a fire destroyed the Millersport, Ohio, lakeside residence of de *530 fendant-appellant Don S. McAuliffe, a duly-elected sitting judge of the Fairfield County Municipal Court, Lancaster, Ohio. At the time of the fire, defenda

852 F.2d 1137 Mercedes VILORIO-LOPEZ, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 86-7547. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 9, 1987.Decided July 26, 1988.As Amended Oct. 3, 1988. Molly McClure, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Fr

284 F.3d 990 Luis LOPEZ, individually and on behalf of the General Public; Barbara Bowman; Gary D. Miller, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-15303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 13, 2002.

302 F.3d 900 Luis LOPEZ, individually and on behalf of the General Public; Barbara Bowman; Gary D. Miller, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-15303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 13, 2002.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Azael Lopez Astaiza, Petitioner v. Case No. 23-cv-127-SM Opinion No. 2023 DNH 048 Warden, FCI Berlin, Respondent O R D E R Azael Lopez Astaiza is a federal prisoner currently being held at the Federal Correctional Institution in Berlin, New Hampshire. He b

United States v. Lopez 01-CR-079-SM 08/27/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America v. Criminal No. 01-cr-79-l-SM Opinion No. 2008 DNH 159 Carlos Lopez O R D E R Defendant's motion to reduce his sentence, based on the United States Sentencing Commission's retroactive amendment

327 Md. 486 (1992) 610 A.2d 778 HELEN LOPEZ, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GERMAN H. RODRIGUEZ ET AL. v. MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. No. 12, September Term, 1992. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 21, 1992. David Bulitt (Wortman, Nemeroff & Bulitt, all on brief), College Park, for appellant. Lucy A. Cardwel

Lopez v . United States 06-CV-004-SM 02/08/07 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Carlos Lopez, Petitioner v. Civil N o . 06-cv-004-SM Opinion N o . 2007 DNH 018 United States of America, Government O R D E R On February 2 8 , 2006, the court denied petitioner’s motion for relief from his convict

Lopez v . United States 06-CV-004-SM 02/28/06 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Carols Lopez Petitioner v. Civil N o . 06-cv-004-SM Opinion N o . 2006 DNH 026 United States of America, Government O R D E R Petitioner, Carlos Lopez, seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Although represented by

Lopez v. SSA CV-96-159-M 05/09/97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Sterling Lopez v. Civil No. 96-159-M Shirley Chater, Commissioner Social Security Administration O R D E R Sterling Lopez moves pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) to reverse the Commissioner's decision denying him social security benefits. He assert

311 F.3d 928 Luis LOPEZ, individually and on behalf of the General Public; Barbara Bowman; Gary D. Miller, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-15303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 13, 2002.

ORDER OF THE COURT The Respondent’s Petition for Panel Rehearing is granted. The panel opinion of this court of December 30, 2002 is withdrawn and the judgment of this court of December 30, 2002 is vacated. The petitioners are invited to submit a brief within fourteen days to address the question of whether this court has jurisdiction to reinstate petitioners’ grant of voluntary departure. The Respondent will then have ten days in whi

Armstrong, J. State Farm and Denise Heaphy could not resolve their dispute over whether State Farm had fully compensated Heaphy under her underinsured motorists (UIM) coverage for her property damage. In addition to her repair bill, Heaphy claimed a loss for the diminished value of the vehicle. Conceding that diminished value is covered under Heaphy’s policy, State Farm sought arbitration. The trial court found that the dispute f

534 F.Supp.2d 1101 (2007) SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC., Plaintiff, v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., Defendants. This Document Also Relates to: Unisys Corp. v. Hynix et al. (C06-2915 PJH); and DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust v. Hynix, et al. (C 07-1381). No. C 06-1665 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 15, 2007.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENFORCE DOCUMENT SUBPOENAS ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court is VISX’s motion to enforce document subpoenas issued to at least 16 third parties. Relying on Fed.R.Civ.P. 45, Nidek asserts that this court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the subpoenas, because they were issued by courts outside the Northern District of California. Under Rule 45,