⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Lopez v. 43 Orchard Realty LLC”

Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIAN JACOBS, ALAN JACOBS, THE ) BERNARD B. JACOBS AND SARA JACOBS ) FAMILY TRUST, JEAN-LOUIS VELAISE, ) DALE KUTNICK, TOREN KUTNICK, ) EDWARD B. ROBERTS, JOHN DENNIS, ) SHLOMO BAKHASH, and JOAN RUBIN, ) ) Plaintiffs, )
Washington Supreme Court · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 17× · 416 P.3d 1205; 190 Wash. 2d 612
YU, J. *614¶ 1 The Washington Minimum Wage Act (MWA), chapter 49.46 RCW, requires employers to compensate employees for their work. This case asks us to apply that general principle to the specific context of agricultural workers who are paid on a piece-rate basis for piece-rate picking work by answering the following two questions, which wer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-03-25 · Published · cited 11× · 638 F.3d 1163
638 F.3d 1163 (2011) SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY; Westlands Water District; State Water Contractors; Metropolitan Water District of Southern California; Coalition for a Sustainable Delta; Kern County Water Agency, Plaintiffs, and Stewart & Jasper Orchards; Arroyo Farms, LLC; King Pistachio Grove, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kenneth Lee SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior; United States Department of the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-03-25 · Published · cited 24× · 638 F.3d 1163; 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20124; 72 ERC (BNA) 2102; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6203; 2011 WL 1086598
OPINION THOMAS, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we consider whether application of sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act to the California delta smelt violates the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution. We conclude that it does not, and we affirm the judgment of the district court. I The delta smelt is a small fish, 60-70 millimeters in leng
District Court, E.D. California · 2017-01-20 · Published · cited 34× · 235 F. Supp. 3d 1132; 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20013; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8332; 2017 WL 272215
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter came before the court on June 22, 2016, for hearing of defendants’ motions to dismiss brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. Nos. 51, 55, 57, 59, 63, 64.) Attorneys Patricia K. Oliver, R. Rex Parris, and Jennifer F. Novak appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Committee
District Court, E.D. California · 2009-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 663 F. Supp. 2d 922; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94776
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE COMMERCE CLAUSE (Docs. 233 & 288). OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case concerns the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's ("FWS") December 15, 2008 biological opinion ("BiOp" or "2008 BiOp") concerning the impact of coordinated operations of the Central Valley Project ("CVP") and State Wate
District Court, E.D. New York · 2003-07-21 · Published · cited 20× · 271 F. Supp. 2d 435; 2003 WL 21689641
271 F.Supp.2d 435 (2003) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, v. ACUSPORT, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. 99 CV 3999(JBW), 99 CV 7037(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 21, 2003. *436 *437 *438
District Court, E.D. California · 2009-10-08 · Published · cited 2× · 663 F. Supp. 2d 922; 2009 WL 3273843
663 F.Supp.2d 922 (2009) In re DELTA SMELT CONSOLIDATED CASES. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, et al. v. Salazar, et al. (1:09-cv-407 OWW DLB). State Water Contractors v. Salazar, et al. (1:09-cv-422 OWW GSA). Coalition for A Sustainable Delta, et al. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al. (1:09-cv-480 OWW GSA). Metropolitan Water District v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service