Cases

Judgment rendered February 26, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,169-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** BOBBY WASHINGTON

FILED AUG 19, 2025 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 39943-5

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-KA-01384-COA JAMIEN WASHINGTON A/K/A JAMAIEN APPELLANT WASHINGTON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/05/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEBRA W. BLACKWELL COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ADAMS COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR

Mary K. Hoff, Presiding Judge Peter Sarandos ("Sarandos") appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Loop Trolley Transportation District ("District") and the Loop Trolley Company ("Trolley Company") (collectively "Respondents") on Sarandos's action for declaratory judgment and permanent injunction brought to prohibit construction and operation of a trolley-car rail system along Delmar Boulevard, from t

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court City of Chicago v. Chicago Loop Parking LLC, 2014 IL App (1st) 133020 Appellate Court THE CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner- Caption Appellant, v. CHICAGO LOOP PARKING LLC, Respondent- Appellee. District & No. First District, Fourth Division Docket No. 1-13-

Schindler, J. ¶1 Harun Mohamed Osman seeks reversal of the assault in the fourth degree jury conviction. Osman contends that during closing argument, the prosecutor improperly shifted the burden of proof, and the court erred in sustaining the State’s objection and impermissibly limited the scope of the defense closing argument. We hold the prosecutor properly argued reasonable infer

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON BLADE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-2591 (RDM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs in this case are the Washington Blade, “the oldest LGBTQ newspaper in the United States” “dedicated t

DIVISION II — 2014 AUG 6 9 APB 9: 35 El IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHING'IVVy

FILED May 1,2014 In the Office of the Clerk of Court W A State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STA

PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Ikeem Washington, appeals following the habeas court's denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) abused its discretion by denying his petition for certification to appeal and (2) erred in concluding that he failed to demonstrate

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2942 WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SPARTA, ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2942 WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SPARTA, ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

BRENNAN, J. ¶ 1. In this decision, we first address Jerred Renard Washington's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed as an original proceeding in this court under State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 484 N.W.2d 540 (1992), and asserting ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Second, we address Washington's appeal from the circuit court's order denying his post-conviction motion to withdraw his no-contes

209 P.3d 524 (2009) ACTIVATE, INC., Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. No. 37329-7-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. June 16, 2009. *525 George Carl Mastrodonato, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellant. Heidi A. Irvin, Attorney General's Office/Revenue Div., Olympi

*194SABERS, Justice (dissenting). [¶29] Defense counsel committed ineffective assistance of counsel by asking Loop, “Did you have any intent to touch a ten-year-old girl to sexually gratify yourself?” Either way Loop answered, the door was opened and a conviction was certain. [¶ 30] If Loop answered yes, he admitted the crime.

SUMMARY ORDER Facebook, Inc., et al. appeal as interve-nors from the final judgment of the United States Distinct Court (Sweet, J.) approving a class action settlement in this securities case stemming from the initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook stock. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review. The appellants intervene to vindicate

FILED JULY 13, 2023 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, )

WOODWARD, J. In December 2010, appellee, the Washington County Department of Social Services (the “Department”), found appellant, Lauren McClanahan, responsible for indicated child abuse by mental injury of her then five-year-old daughter, Raven H. (“Raven”). The finding of child abuse stemmed