Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti”
Loop Ai Labs, Inc. v. Gattipublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Loop AI Labs Inc. v. Gattipublic domain
ORDER ON MOTION TO ENFORCE COURT ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S TRADE SECRET DISCLOSURE Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge Defendant IQSystem, Inc. (“IQS”) filed a motion to enforce the court’s December 21, 2015 order directing Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. to submit a particularized trade secret disclosure. Defendant Almawave USA, Inc. (“Almawave”) joins in IQS’s motion. [Docket Nos. 459 (Mot.), 472.] P
Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.public domain
ORDER Kimberly J. Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE An online vehicle auction company hired a software development company to design and build its new online system, but when the project did not go as planned the auction company terminated the contract and the parties sued each other. The auction company, plaintiff Copart, Inc. (“Co-part”), moves
Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.public domain
Undermining Zomm's breach-of-contract claim is that the amended complaint alleges that Apple began to exploit Zomm's confidential information in December 2011. FAC ¶ 25 ("Beginning in December 2011 and continuing through November 2016 ...."). December 2011 however, was after both the Wireless Leash Plus's release and the '895 Patent's publication. See FAC ¶ 20 (noting the Wireless Leash Plus's November 2011 release), '895 Patent (noting a
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0237p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CAUDILL SEED & WAREHOUSE CO., INC., │ Plain
In re Fluidmaster, Inc.public domain
*944MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Fluid-master’s motion to dismiss [136]. For the *945reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion [136] is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background
Uber Technologies, Inc., retained Zemcar Inc.—which was doing business as Grip Mobility Co. (“Grip”)— to develop a smart-phone-based app that would make audiovisual recordings of Uber rides, to protect both passengers and drivers. Grip contends that its app was a great success during a Brazilian pilot program; Uber asserts that the app had “significant issues and limitations.” Uber and Grip also discussed the possibilit
Aft Mich. v. Project Veritaspublic domain
[ECF NO. 48] ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD, United States Magistrate Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff AFT Michigan filed a motion to compel Defendants Project Veritas and Marisa L. Jorge to participate in a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference and to commence discovery. [ECF No. 48]. The motion was referred to this Court for hearing and determination, [E