Cases

ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE Plaintiffs Tonya and Jason Long seek relief on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated for the alleged refusal of Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company to assess and pay for diminished value when its insureds claim losses covered under their State Farm homeowners’ insurance policies. Doc. 1 at ¶¶ 1; 38. State Farm

Memorandum Opinion and Order MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. I. Introduction Despite experiencing extreme financial difficulty at the time, Todd and Rhonda *1337Pittman — the plaintiffs in this case — went on a European vacation in the summer of 2010. They returned stateside to a burglarized home; their art collection was m

Bennett v State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (2020 NY Slip Op 01900) Bennett v State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 2020 NY Slip Op 01900 Decided on March 18, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State

HON. PAMELA PEPPER, United States District Judge Two weeks after the plaintiff purchased a homeowners policy from the defendant, a fire severely damaged the property he had purchased from the City of Milwaukee for $3,750. The plaintiff filed a claim for the policy limits, but failed to timely provide the defendant with all of the supporting documentation. One year to the date of the fire, the defendant denied the plaintiff's claim u

II. Analysis The parties properly invoke our diversity jurisdiction, requiring we apply federal procedural law and Pennsylvania substantive law governing the interpretation of insurance contracts.22 The parties argue our decision turns on a single question of law: is Julia Morath's death by suicide an "occurrence," defined as an "accident," triggering State Farm's duty to defend under Pennsylvan

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (R. 40). Fully briefed, these matters are ripe for decision. For the reasons set forth below, the Court HEREBY GRANTS THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. In February of 2016, a fire damaged Heather Alvey's residence, garage, and personal property. (Alvey'

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: In April 2006, Plaintiffs Cori and Kerri Rigsby (hereinafter, “the Rigsbys” or “re-lators”) brought this qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (“FCA”), claiming that State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) submitted false claims to the United States government for payment on flood policie

Colleen Dolan, J. Jonathan Loomis ("Appellant") appeals the trial court's grant of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's ("State Farm's") third motion for summary judgment on Appellant's claim that he was entitled to certain motor vehicle insurance coverage under a temporary binder of insurance issued to him by State Farm. Appellant offers three points on appeal, each arguing that the trial court erred in granting State Farm's moti

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge *1268I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Before the Court is State Farm Fire & Casualty Company's ("State Farm") Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff John Brown's ("Mr. Brown") breach of contract claim. (Doc. 32). Also before the Court is State Farm's Motion To Str

McCALLUM, J. *1178This lawsuit results from a significant crack located in the foundation of a house in Downsville, Louisiana, owned by Toby and Sherri Shreve ("Shreves"). A jury found the crack was caused by a tree falling on the house, which was covered by their homeowner's insurance policy with State Farm. The jury also found that State

[Cite as Cambridge Village Condominium Owners' Assn. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2025-Ohio-802.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY CAMBRIDGE VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM CASE NO. 2024-L-063 OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas

Reese, Judge. *53*362Johnny S. Anglin ("the Appellant") appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside the trial court's entry of default judgment against him in an action for property damage initiated by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (the "Appel

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 13:57:34 2017.08.09 Certiorari Denied, May 17, 2017, No. S-1-SC-36432 IN THE COURT OF

828 S.W.2d 125 (1992) Richard LONG, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 01-91-00526-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). February 27, 1992. Rehearing Denied April 30, 1992. *126 William S. Bush, Lynne Liberate, Houston, for appellant. Warren Taylor, Houston, for

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: __________________ 3 Filing Date: March 28, 2017 4 NO. 34,932 5 JENNY DOVE and DAVID TAPIA, 6 Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, 7 v. 8 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY 9 COMPANY, 10 Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 12 David K. Thomson, District Judge 13 Bauman, Dow & Stambaugh, P.C. 14 Mark C. Dow 15 Deborah R. Stambaugh 16 Maria R.

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Chauncey McCabe (2018 NY Slip Op 04416) State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Chauncey McCabe 2018 NY Slip Op 04416 Decided on June 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by

[Cite as Williams v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2018-Ohio-57.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Karen Williams, : No. 17AP-437 Plaintiff-Appellant, : & No. 17AP

*750 OPINION CONTI, Chief Judge. I. Introduction This insurance class action was removed to this court from the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Individually and on behalf of a putative class of Pennsylvania homeowners, plaintiffs Vincent and Linda Papurello (“plaintiffs”) allege defendant

This opinion was filed for record ;£:QQ Ocro onfih 2)'Dlj at ~~ SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ISIDORO PEREZ-CRISANTOS, ) a single man, )

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur