Cases

GAZIANO, J. **804This matter concerns the search of a warehouse, pursuant to a search warrant that was issued, in part, based on the odor of unburnt marijuana. Before the District Court judge had issued **805a decision on the defendant's motion to suppress

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice RIVERA-SOTO, dissenting. Giving bare passing reference to the core principles of statutory construction intended to govern the interpretation of statutes, ante at 54-55, 999 A.2d at 437-38, the majority contorts the plain language of the Affidavit of Merit statute (AMS), N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-26 to -29, as modified by the New Jersey Medical Care Access and Responsibility and Patients First Act

FISHER, Circuit Judge. This case raises again the frequently-litigated question of whether violation of a statute-here, the Fair Credit Reporting Act-is an injury in fact that satisfies the Constitution's "case or controversy" requirement. The District Court concluded that the plaintiffs did not allege a concrete injury in fact and therefore dismissed their complaint for lack of juris

MEMORANDUM ** Carlos Ibarra appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we only repeat them as necessary to understand our disposition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm. Ibarra argues that, by denying him a continuance, the trial court prevented hi

2008 SD 94 STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ZACHARIAH PALMER RYAN, Defendant and Appellant. No. 24607. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Opinion Filed October 8, 2008. Considered On Briefs On August 26, 2008. LAWRENCE E. LONG, Attorney General, CRAIG M. EICHSTADT, Assistant Attorney General, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintif

MEMORANDUM ** Carlos Ibarra appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we only repeat them as necessary to understand our disposition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm. Ibarra argues that, by denying him a continuance, the trial court prevented hi

OPINION The central issue presented in this appeal is whether a trial court erred in *Page 946 granting a no-evidence summary-judgment motion one day before the previously scheduled hearing on the motion when the non-movant had failed to file either a response or objections to the motion before the deadline for doing so. Under the circumstances here, we conclude there was no reversible error. Appel

1 Reported in 281 N.W. 75. This matter comes here upon a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' appeal for failure to join the defendant Doyle in the appeal. The suit is for an injunction to restrain the sheriff from executing a writ of restitution issued by the municipal court of the city of Morris. The litigation out of which grew the present case originated in a forcible entry and unlawf

[Cite as Ryan v. Ryan, 2024-Ohio-5691.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT James Michael Ryan, Jr., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 23AP-554 (C.P.C. No. 21DR-4418) v. : (REGULAR C

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Suzanne Ryan-Beedy initiated this action against defendants Ditech Financial, LLC ("Ditech") and the Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificate Holders of the CWALT, Inc. ("the Bank of New York Mellon") for damages and equitable relief resulting from defendants' alleged acts or omissions concerning the residential mortgage lo

OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. Ryan Shelby (“Shelby”) was convicted in Warrick Circuit Court of murder, Class D felony obstruction of justice, and two counts of Class A misdemeanor false informing. Shelby appeals and presents numerous issues, which we reorder, renumber, and restate as: I. Whether the trial court abused its disc

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William A. Long brought this action against Defendants the District of Columbia Housing A

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed. Long claims that the Department of Transportation discriminated against her on the basis of her race in denying her a career l

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Long Construction Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is b

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 31, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D18-1420 & 3D18-1457 Lower Tribunal No. 16-29168 ________________ Jade Nicole Ryan,

OPINION ON REHEARING LILE, Vice Presiding Judge: 1 Appellant, Justin Ryan Long, was convicted after a non-jury trial of First Degree Malice Aforethought Murder in violation of 21 0.8.8upp.1998, § 701.7(A), in the District Court of Stephens County, Case No. CF-2000-145. The Honorable George W. Lind-ley, District Judge, sentenced Appellant to life imprisonment without the possibility of

The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The action was brought to annul and cancel a deed purporting to have been executed on July 22, 1905, by the decedent, Sarah M. Ryan, conveying certain parcels of land to her two daughters, the defendants herein. On the day of its date the deed was delivered in a sealed envelope by the grantor to the Title Insurance Trust Company as custodian with directions for its delivery upon certain contingencies to hap

Matter of Ryan (2025 NY Slip Op 25016) [*1] Matter of Ryan 2025 NY Slip Op 25016 Decided on January 24, 2025 Surrogate's Court, Monroe County Ciaccio, S. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

MEMORANDUM FINAL ORDER REBECCA BEACH SMITH, Chief Judge. The court lifted its stay of this case on July 20, 2012, which stay had been issued by Order of August 1, 2011. The court then directed the parties to “file responses concerning any subsequent action necessary by this court in light of the Fourth Circuit’s decision.” Order 1, ECF No. 86. Defendants Donald Palmer, in his official capacity as