Cases

November 15, 1926, Lon Morris College, a corporation, domiciled at Jacksonville, Cherokee county, Tex., conveyed to T. L. Fleming certain land in Camp county expressly reserving a vendor's lien to secure the payment of ten purchase-money notes executed by Fleming for $450 each, bearing interest at the rate of 7 per cent. per annum from January 1, 1927. The first note was payable January 1, 1928, and one was payable January 1st of each subsequent year. Contemporaneously with the execution of t

George A. Sarandos, et al. v. Laura Lee Blanton IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

25 S.W.3d 811 (2000) George A. SARANDOS and Athena Sarandos, Appellants, v. Laura Lee BLANTON, Appellee. No. 10-98-364-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. July 26, 2000. *812 Russell Horn, Dan Miller, McElroy, Sullivan, Ryan & Miller, L.L.P., Austin, for appellant. Michael P. Graham, Stephen G. Tipps, Gretchen Allen,

730 S.W.2d 872 (1987) EQUINOX ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED MEDIA INCORPORATED, Appellee. No. 05-86-00379-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. May 22, 1987. *874 Stephen C. Porter, Dallas, for appellants. W. Steven Walker, Dallas, for appellee. Before HOWELL, ROWE and LAGARDE, JJ. LAG

812 F.Supp. 1352 (1993) PFIZER INC., Plaintiff, v. ELAN PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH CORP. and Elan Corporation, PLC, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-402 LON. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 4, 1993. *1353 *1354 William J. Wade, of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE, Josep

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 939 American Lease Plan, appellant, brought this suit against appellee, Ben-Kro Corporation, alleging that Ben-Kro had breached a lease agreement under which American Lease Plan was to supply and deliver certain office and printing equipment for a specified monthly rental of $81.49 over a term of 36 months. Amer

679 F.Supp. 1183 (1988) The BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, and B & D Acquisition Inc., a Maryland corporation, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN STANDARD INC., a Delaware corporation, and Charles M. Oberly, III, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, and Michael E. Harkins, Secretary of State of State of Delaware, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-50 LON. United States District Court, D

OPINION LONGOBARDI, District Judge. On June 19,1984, Plaintiff The Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”) brought these actions alleging patent infringement, inducement of patent infringement and unfair competition.1 United States Letters Patent No. 4,455,333 (“the ’333 patent”) was issued to P & G on the same date and covers the invention styled “Doughs and Cookies Provi

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN LINEHAN and THOMAS ) MILLS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0851-BWD ) STANLEY A. MILLS, JR., PATRICK ) GOSSETT, EDWARD CHRZANOWSKI, ) FRANCIS MARKERT, TIM BENNETT, ) TONI SHARP, DONALD PRESTON, ) THE CITY OF REHOBOTH BEACH ) BOARD OF

HEARN, C.J.: Thomas Durrette Wooten, Jr., (Husband) appeals several aspects of a divorce decree, including the award of the marital home to Wife, the identification of certain credit card charges incurred after the parties’ separation as marital debt, the decision to grant Wife permanent alimony of $4,300 per month, and the award to Wife of $52,917.21 in attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm as modified in part and reverse and

358 S.C. 54 (2003) 594 S.E.2d 854 Thomas Durrette WOOTEN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Mona Rae Howell WOOTEN, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Pam Perry, Third-Party Defendant, of whom Thomas Durrette Wooten, Jr., is the Appellant, and Mona Rae Howell Wooten is the Respondent. No. 3610. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard January 13, 2003

604 F.Supp. 1485 (1985) The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NABISCO BRANDS, INC., Defendant. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KEEBLER COMPANY, Defendant. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 84-333 LON to 84-335 LON. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 20, 1985.</

364 S.C. 532 (2005) 615 S.E.2d 98 Thomas Durrette WOOTEN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Mona Rae WOOTEN, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. Pam Perry, Third Party Defendant, of whom Thomas Durrette Wooten, Jr., is Petitioner/Respondent and Mona Rae Wooten, is Respondent/Petitioner. and Thomas Durrette Wooten, Jr., Respondent, v. Mona Rae Howell Wooten, Petitioner. No. 25977.

Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. A jury convicted Michael Baraka Mason of three counts of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) 1 and found true the special circumstances of robbery murder (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)) and multiple murders (§ 190.2, subd.

The appellant, C. C. Slaughter, filed this suit against the appellee, J. C. Daniels, for the title and possession of certain land in Cochran County, Texas; for the cancellation of a sales contract upon the land; for removal of cloud from the title; and for damages in the sum of $300 by reason of the alleged conversion of ten bales of cotton by the appellee. The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, rendered judgment for the appellant for the title and possession of the land, for ca

Opinion of the Court by Justice GRAVES. This is the third in a recent continuum of cases concerning the extent to which a party can discover and prove the positional bias of an adverse party’s expert witness. In Tuttle v. Perry, Ky., 82 S.W.3d 920 (2002), this Court held that a CR 35.011 *632examining physician can

OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Lorrie Poublon entered into an agreement with defendants C.H. Robinson Co. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (collectively, “C.H. Robinson”) to arbitrate claims arising out of her employment. In the present action, the district court denied C.H. Robinson’s motion to stay, compel arbitration, and dismiss class an

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Bernice C. Atchison, proceeding pro se, seeks damages from various Defendants associated with the series of lawsuits in this District that culminated in

H. T. Swink, plaintiff below, was awarded recovery for injuries suffered from a fall into an orchestra pit, a part of the stage of the Palace Theater, which was owned and operated by appellant, East Texas Theatres, Inc., defendant below. The jury found as to primary negligence: (1) That defendant failed to provide adequate light; (2) failed to warn plaintiff of the pit prior to his fall; (3) maintained the orchestra pit without having a guard to prevent persons walking upon the stage from fal

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL May 30, 2023 564 MAY, 2023 346 Conn. 564 Deutsche Bank AG v. Sebastian Holdings, Inc. DEUTSCHE BANK AG v. SEBASTIAN HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL. (SC 20647) Robinson, C. J., and D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker and Alexander, Js.