Cases

Filed 12/4/24; certified for publication 12/31/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- LISA LOMBARDO et al., C098857 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 34-

SOUTER, Associate Justice. This appeal is from the bankruptcy court’s dismissal on summary judgment of John Zullo’s adversary proceeding against debtor David Lombardo, after denying Zullo leave to amend his complaint. We affirm. In September 2010, Lombardo filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. In December, Zul-lo began an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, alleging that Lombar-do’s debt to him was n

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District IN THE MATTER OF A.L.R.; ) ) K.R., ) WD79123 ) Respondent, ) OPINION FILED: July 26, 2016 ) v.

Opinion KLINE, P. J. Attorney Kurt D. Huysentruyt represented Paul J. Winters when the latter attempted to amend a trust he had established to make appellants its beneficiaries. The amendment was ruled ineffective by the probate court. Subsequently, appellants sued Huysentruyt for malpractice. They now appeal the superior court’s grant of nonsuit to Huysentruyt, con

ACCEPTED 15-24-00052-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/24/2025 12:00 AM No. 15-24-00052-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

100 F.Supp.2d 1179 (2000) PTI, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. No. CV 99-8235 NM (EX). United States District Court, C.D. California. May 25, 2000. *1180 *1181 *1182 *1183

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00543-CV Murchinson Ltd., Appellant v. Next Frontier Holdings, Inc. and Benuvia, Inc., Appellees FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 23-1914-C368, THE HONORABLE SARAH SOELDNER BRUCHMILLER, JUDGE PRESIDING ME MO RAN DU M O

MEMORANDUM BARTLE, District Judge. This is a legal malpractice action. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for production of thirty-one documents which the defendants Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrie, Bowman & Lombardo, P.C. and Michael J. Curry, Esquire (hereinafter collectively, defendant law firm) have withheld on the ground of attorney-client privilege and/or attorney’s work product.

Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Blue Book Services gathers information about the produce industry and sells that information to subscribers. In July 2016, Blue Book discovered, much to its surprise, that its entire proprietary database of members-only credit rating information had been downloaded and publicly posted to an unaffiliated website. R. 58, PSOF ¶¶ 1, 5, 52, 21-23.1 Afte

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. ) KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney ) General of the State of Delaware, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-09-097 MMJ CCLD ) BP AMERICA INC., BP P.L.C., ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., ) CONOCOPHILLIPS,

160 F.3d 899 Tammy YOUNG, Individually and as parent and natural guardianof infants Matthew Young, Michael Young and NicoleYoung, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COUNTY OF FULTON, Fulton County Department of SocialServices, Karen Hasenfuss, Individually and in her officialcapacity as an employee of the County of Fulton, KathleenPape, Individually and in her official capacity as anemployee of the County of Fulton, Penny Lockwoo

JACOBS, Circuit Judge: In September 1992 plaintiff-appellant Tammy Young voluntarily placed her twin boys in foster care under the supervision of the Fulton County Department of Social Services (“DSS”). Young brings this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) seeking damages against the County of Fulton, DSS, and sev*901eral individual employees of DSS for allegedly de

999 F.Supp. 282 (1998) Tammy YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF FULTON; Fulton County Department of Social Services; Karen Hasenfuss, Kathleen Pape, and Penny Lockwood, Individually and in their official capacity as employees of the County of Fulton; Jeanne D. Johannes, Individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of Fulton County; and John Doe and Jane Doe, unknown employees of the County of Fulton,

19-235-cv Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprs., Inc. 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ____________________ 5 6 August Term, 2019 7 8 (Argued: January 8, 2020 Decided: February 9, 2021) 9 10 Docket No. 19-235 11 12 ____________________ 13

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff William Kader and Lead Plaintiffs Morad Ghodooshim, Roger Lam, and Laxmikant Chudasama (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") sought to represent a class of purchasers of securities that Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. ("Sarepta") issued between April 21, 2014, and October 27, 2014 (the "Class Period"). The Plaintiffs brought securities fraud claims against Sare

Judith Gail Dein, United States Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Kristen Brettell, was injured while working on a laminating machine at the facility of her employer, Madico, Inc. ("Madico"). She brought this action against the defendants, Omron Scientific Technologies, Inc. and Omron STI Machine Services, Inc. (collectively "Omron"), alleging that Omron had been negligent in

*469MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.. .470 II. STATEMENT OF FACTS... 472 A. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.... 472 B. March 18, 2009-March 22, 2009...476 1. Paul James... 4

PER CURIAM.. Plaintiffs Bert Bridges (“Bridges”) and James Massengale, Jr. (“Mass’engale”) filed a nine-count petition (“the Petition”) agaiftst Defendants Bore-Flex Industries, Iric. (“Bore-Flex”); Deborah' M. Hamilton, personal representative of the Estate of Carl D; Jungers, Sr. (“Carl Jungers”), Michael R. Morgan, Carl D, Jungers, Jr. (“Doug Jungers”), Daniel Jungers, David Jungers, and Sharon Morgan (collectively,

ORDER DOUGLAS HARPOOL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42). Upon *1042careful review of the issues raised and arguments provided, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion and enters judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all remaining claims.

OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Michael Goldemberg, Annie Le, and Howard Petlack (“Named Plaintiffs” or “Plaintiffs”) each bring consumer protection claims against Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (“Johnson & Johnson”) in this proposed class action under the laws of their home states: New York, California, and Florida, respectively. Pur