Cases

GROSS, J. In a guardianship proceeding, the denial of due process to the wife of the proposed ward requires reversal of an order determining incapacity and orders appointing limited guardians of person and property. Factual Background On March 17, 2014, appellee Robert Zel-man filed petitions with the probate court r

GROSS, J. Appellee Robert Zelman filed petitions with the probate court seeking determinations that his 85-year-old father, Martin Zelman, was incapacitated and requesting the appointment of guardians of person and property. Aside from allegations of odd behavior and diminishing capacity, the petitions complained that Martin’s wife, appellant Lois Zelman, was taking advantage of M

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LOIS ZELMAN, Appellant, v. MARTIN ZELMAN, ROBERT ZELMAN, individually and as co-guardian of the property of Martin Zelman, LISA HELD, individually and as limited guardian of the person of Martin Zelman, and CURTIS ROGERS, as co- guardian of the property of Martin Zelman,

PER CURIAM. These consolidated appeals are of two orders in the same guardianship proceeding where we have reversed orders in related cases. See Zelman v. Zelman, No. 4D14-1858, 2015 WL 4002241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), reh’g denied (Aug. 18, 2015); and Zelman v. Zelman, Nos. 4D14-1851 and 4D14-1887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). We reverse the orders of June 9, 2014 and September 12, 2014. We note that the sourc

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 2, 2021 NANDIGAM NEUROLOGY, PLC ET AL. v. KELLY BEAVERS Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Wilson County No. 2020-CV-152 Barry Tatum, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2020-00553-COA-R3-CV _________________________

SEE, Justice. These petitions concern the reopening of a final judgment of paternity. The trial court allowed á man who had previously been adjudicated the father of a child to proffer deoxy-ribose nucleic acid (“DNA”) evidence indicating that he was not the child’s biological father. The trial court reopened the judgment of paternity, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 26-17A-1; entered an order finding the previously adjudicated

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff in a case arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant W. Nyles Spurlock, a public school principal, challenges a jury award of $113,000 compensatory and $7,500 punitive damages to plaintiff Lois E. Wren, a teacher who contended at trial that Spurlock harassed her in

521 F.3d 253 (2008) Joseph C. COLACICCO, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Lois Ann Colacicco, Deceased, Appellant v. APOTEX INC.; Apotex Corp., as Subsidiary of Apotex, Inc.; Smithkline Beecham, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline Beth Ann McNellis, on Behalf of the Estate of Theodore DeAngelis, Deceased and in Her Own Right v. Pfizer Inc.; John Does 1-5; ABC Doe Corp.; DEF Doe Corp.; GHI Doe Corp. Pfizer Inc., Appellant.

48 Cal.Rptr.3d 233 (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 344 DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY et al., Cross-complainants and Respondents, v. LEW WILLIAMS, INC. et al., Cross-defendants and Appellants. No. C049340. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. August 3, 2006. *235 Robert E. Davies, Caulfield, Davies &

J-A18033-23 2025 PA Super 30 JAMES HARRIS, JR. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA v. : : DANIELLE M. FELOUZIS : : Appellant : No. 85 WDA 2023 Appeal from the Judgment Entered March 22

[1] In this case the employee, Willard Wallace Wilson, filed a claim for compensation for disability due to occupational disease and later died from other causes before an award was entered by the State Industrial Court. Thereafter the claim was revived in the names of his dependents and an award was made in their favor. Petitioners, the employer and insurance carrier, bring this proceeding to review the award. [2] The method of revivor, the dependents named, and the sufficienc

129 P.3d 905 (2006) ANCHORAGE CHRYSLER CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Appellee. No. S-11421. Supreme Court of Alaska. February 24, 2006. *906 Randall Simpson, Blair M. Christensen, Jermain, Dunnagan & Owens, P.C., Anchorage, for Appellant. Jeffrey M. Feldman, Ruth Botstein, Feldman & Orlan

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, District Judge. Breanna Sadler and her parents Michelle and Brian Sadler (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action to recover for injuries Breanna incurred as a result of the malfunctioning of her cochlear implant against Advanced Bionics, the manufacturer of the device. Advanced Bionics now moves for summary judgment of most of Plaintiffs’ claims on

OPINION J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, P.J., W.S., and DAVID R. FARMER, J., joined. In this case, we are called upon to review the trial court’s decision to set aside a consent order regarding an annexation on the basis of the subsequent passage of

152 F.Supp.2d 1234 (2001) UNITED STATES of America and the State of Colorado, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, and Third-Party Defendants, v. Robert M. FRIEDLAND, Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Counter-Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Aztec Minerals Corporation, an Ohio corporation; South Mountain Minerals Corporation and Gray Eagle Mining Corporation, a Colorado Corporation, Third-Party Defendants, Counter and Cross-Claimants, and Th

173 F.Supp.2d 1077 (2001) UNITED STATES of America and the State of Colorado, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, and Third-Party Defendants, v. Robert M. FRIEDLAND, Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Counter-Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Aztec Minerals Corporation, an Ohio corporation; South Mountain Minerals Corporation and Gray Eagle Mining Corporation, a Colorado Corporation, Third-Party Defendants, Counter and Cross-Claimants, and Th

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (dissenting). ¶ 138 At its core, academic freedom is a professional principle, not merely a legal construct.1 It embraces the academic freedom of the faculty as well as the academic freedom of the institution. "Academic freedom thrives not only on the independent and uninhibited exchange of ideas among teachers and students, but also ... on autonomous decisionmaking by the academ

630 S.W.2d 76 (1982) Paul D. TACKETT, Gerald Newson, Earl Ousley, David D. Hinchman and Frank McGuire, Appellants, v. KENTUCKY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION and Floyd County Board of Education, Appellees. and Edith MEADOWS, Wallace R. Smith, Betty T. Turner, Eula J. Smith, Grace Turner, Lexene T. Combs, Hazel Hatton, Eva Jean Turner, Phyllis Noble, Alfred Turner, Herbert J. Turner, Nadine Risner, Maxine Watts Hudson, Dorothy Mae Turner, M

DIAZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from a multidistrict litigation ("MDL") in which thousands of women claim that their use of the medication Lipitor caused them to develop diabetes. The women sued Pfizer, Lipitor's manufacturer, asserting various products liability claims. After protracted litigation, the district court granted summary judgment to Pfizer. Plaintiffs now ask us t

Filed 5/3/16 (unmodified opinion attached) (review denied 8/22/16; reposted to include Supreme Court statements upon denial of review) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO BEATRIZ VERGARA, a Minor, etc., B258589 et al.,