⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Logan v. Social Security Administration”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-08-29 · Published · cited 0× · 444 F. App'x 659
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Diane Logan appeals the magistrate judge’s order* granting summary judgment for the Commissioner of Social Security in her action seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits. On appeal, we confine our review to
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 566 U.S. 912; 132 S. Ct. 1809; 80 U.S.L.W. 3546; 182 L. Ed. 2d 630; 2012 WL 297067; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2502
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014-11-10 · Published · cited 869× · 771 F.3d 780; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21353; 2014 WL 5803932
BLACK, Circuit Judge: Donnell Mitchell appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of his application for supplemental security income (SSI) and the Appeals Council’s decision denying his request for review. On appeal, Mitchell contends substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s credibility determination and that the Appeals Coun
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-07-11 · Published · cited 0× · 230 F. App'x 997
ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Logan Thurman’s unopposed motion to dismiss his petition for review, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-10-29 · Published · cited 695× · 906 F.3d 1353
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The disability programs administered under the Social Security Act "are of a size and extent difficult to comprehend." Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389 , 399,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995-12-05 · Published · cited 74× · 71 F.3d 372; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33738; 49 Soc. Serv. Rev. 541
RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed.RApp.P. 84(f) and 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Jeff Reid app
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996-11-01 · Published · cited 147× · 99 F.3d 972; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28742; 1996 WL 635165
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Claimant Patrick K. Miller appeals from the district court’s order affirming the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits. 1 The issue on appeal is whether the record contains substantial evidence to support the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) conclusion that claimant was not
Logan v. Blinkenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANET MARIE LOGAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-2275 (FYP) ANTONY BLINKEN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In June 2020, Plaintiff Janet Marie Logan submitted a visa petition to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (“
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-11-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ROBERT KURSAR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-2001 (RBW) ) TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ) ADMINISTRATION,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-11-22 · Published · cited 24× · 751 F. Supp. 2d 154; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123428; 2010 WL 4721304
751 F.Supp.2d 154 (2010) Robert KURSAR, Plaintiff, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-2001 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2010. *157 Bradley P. Moss, Mark S. Zaid, Mark S. Zaid, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Claire M. Whitaker,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-30 · Published · cited 11× · 175 F. Supp. 3d 209; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42546; 2016 WL 1267798
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Pro se plaintiff Thomas Logan (“Plaintiff’) brings the instant lawsuit alleging various causes of action against defendants Irina Matveevskii (“Matveevskii”), Tuckahoe Housing Authority (“THA”), Tuckahoe Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, Mark Kamensky (“Kamensky”), and Jeff Zuckerman (“Zuckerman”) (collectively, “Defendants”).
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-09-04 · Published · cited 21× · 937 F.3d 1119
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2764 ___________________________ Morgan Katelin Pearson; Kirsten Elizabeth Kirkpatrick lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Logan University, doing business as Logan College of Chiropractic
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-09-29 · Published · cited 79× · 57 F. Supp. 3d 234; 2014 WL 5025953
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiff Thomas Logan (“Logan”), proceeding pro se, brings this Action against Defendants Irina Matveevskii (“Mat-veevskii”), Jeff Zuckerman (“Zucker-man”), Mark Kamensky (“Kamensky”), Tuckahoe Housing Authority (“THA”), Adolfo Carrión (“Carrión”), and Mirza Or-riols (“Orriols”).1 Matveevskii, Zucker-man, Kamensky, an
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2019-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 TN WC 24
FILED Feb 11, 2019 12:56 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
California Court of Appeal · 2023-08-10 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/10/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT B326869 THE RECALL OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY GEORGE GASCÓN, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCP03795) Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEAN C. LOGAN, as Los
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996-06-12 · Published · cited 11× · 86 F.3d 176; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14185; 1996 WL 316421
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Suhiyr Saleem appeals from an order of the district court affirming the Secretary’s decision denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). 1 Ms. Saleem filed for SSI on September 20, 1989. She alleged disability due to art
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018-03-15 · Published · cited 2× · 238 So. 3d 1134
RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Bettye Logan sustained a compensable leg injury while employed at Klaussner Furniture Corporation d/b/a Bruce Furniture Industries ("Klaussner"). An Administrative Judge ("AJ"), and the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Commission ("Commission"), found that Logan had suffered a sixty-percent loss of industrial use to her left lower extre
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995-12-07 · Published · cited 130× · 77 F.3d 1210; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34343; 1995 WL 810744
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(f) and 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Lois Bean appeals fr
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996-01-29 · Published · cited 618× · 75 F.3d 1421; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1106; 1996 WL 31935
RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge. Claimant Ray Marshall appeals the district court’s affirmance of the decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services reopening claimant’s March 8, 1988 eligibility determination for blind benefits, terminating his benefits upon a finding that he engaged in substantial gainful activity in 1986, and authorizing recovery of the amounts over
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-06-08 · Published · cited 3× · 149 F.3d 1191; 1998 WL 321189; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 22819
149 F.3d 1191 98 CJ C.A.R. 2961 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,