Cases

Doerfer, J. This is the Commonwealth’s appeal from the allowance of the defendant’s August, 2001, motion for a new trial. The defendant was charged with being an accessory before the fact to murder,1 and other related crimes arising out of a *542gang-related shooting on February 28, 1995, in Springfield.2 On Januar

On August 6, 2014, the defendant pleaded guilty to eleven counts of aggravated rape and indecent assault and battery on a child under fourteen. His thirteen year old daughter was the victim. On March 24, 2017, the defendant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, arguing primarily that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel advised him to plead guilty without first obtaining a ruling on a motion to suppress critical video evidence

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Sentencing courts have broad discretion in setting conditions of supervised release — but broad discretion is not unbridled discretion. Defendant-appellant Jorge Mercado complains that the sentencing court went too far in this case and acted arbitrarily in setting the conditions of his supervised release. Concluding that the defendant’s jeremiad is unconvinc

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Edward Mitchell, a prisoner in the custody of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"),

410 F.Supp.2d 98 (2006) Etta NOVICK and Isaac Novick, individually and as Trustees of the Etta Novick, MD & Isaac Novick, MD, PC Employees' Pension Trust, Plaintiffs, v. BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Kirsch Financial Services, Inc., Michael A. Kirsch, Eisner C.P.A., P.C., Leonard Eisner and Troy Eisner, Defendants. No. CV 05-3085. United States District Court, E.D. New York.</

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

525 F.3d 74 (2008) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. John E. CURRAN, Defendant, Appellant. No. 06-2647. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 8, 2007. Decided May 12, 2008. *75 Tamara A. Barney, for appellant. Donald C. Lockhart, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Robert Clark Co

DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, Senior United States District Judge Pending before the Court are the following motions: (a) Petitioner Lenisse Aponte-Aponte's ("Petitioner" or "Aponte-Aponte") Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence in Criminal Case No. 12-931 (DRD) (D.E. 1

OPINION AND ORDER PIERAS, District Judge. The Court has before it petitioner’s motion, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, attacking his sentence imposed by this Court in Criminal Case No. 90-271 (JP), respondent’s opposition, and petitioner’s supplemental motions (docket Nos. 1, 6, and 11). Petitioner moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, alleging violation of his rights under the Due Pr

RESTREPO, Circuit Judge. Appellant Shawn Shaw, a former corrections officer, was convicted by a jury of sexually assaulting a female inmate in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 and obstruction of justice in violation of

Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 04-1735 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSE DEL CARMEN CORCINO-RAMIREZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE

08/25/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 14, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KALPESH PATEL and PRATIKKUMAR V. PATEL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County Nos. F-71339A & F-71339B David M. Bragg, Judge

04/24/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 24, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RAFFAEL FANSANO Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sullivan County No. S65,438 William K. Rogers, Judge No. E20

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1593 CARLOS MONTEIRO SILVA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Howard, Chief Judge,

Case: 15-31114 Document: 283-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 15-31114 March 27, 2025

ALVORD, J. The defendant, Robert John Purcell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, of conviction of one count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21(a)(1) and of two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21(a)(2).

Spina, J. In this case, the defendant’s motion to withdraw his admission to sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilty under Mass. R. Crim. P. 30 (b), as appearing in 435 Mass. 1501 (2001), was granted by a judge in the Boston Municipal Court.1 The Commonwealth appealed, and we granted the Commonwealth’s application for direct appellate review.2 This case is one of fo

MARBLEY, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. KETHLEDGE, J. (pp. 702-05), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. Defendant-Appellant Gary Clay appeals his convictions of carjacking and brandishing a firearm, contending that the district court erred in admitting evidence of prior bad acts, in denying his Rule 29

JUDGES: Hon. Carol Ann Robb, Hon. Gene Donofrio, Hon. Cheryl L. Waite OPINION ROBB, P.J. {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Kalontae Carter appeals from his conviction of aggravated murder after a jury trial in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court. Appellant argues his co-defendant's statement to another inmate should not have been admitted. Appellant

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Patrick Sarullo, a former employee of the United States Postal Service, was arrested for dealing drugs at work and was subsequently discharged. Sarullo, denying the charge, brought a Bivens action for malicious prosecution arising out of the arrest and also a claim against the Postal Service under Titl