Cases

INMAN, Judge. *569 *351 A daughter's difficult decision to admit her father, who suffered from dementia, to a long-term assisted living and memory care facility as his attorney-in-fact did not cr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 14-0538 ══════════ CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE GROUP HOLDING, INC., PETITIONER, v. NAUTIC MANAGEMENT VI, L.P., RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment [46] of the Defendants Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC d/b/a River Region Medical Center (“RRMC”) and Darlene White. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. J.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RIVER VALLEY ) INGREDIENTS, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-12-160 PRW ) CCLD AMERICAN PROTEINS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants/Counte

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 19-3693 _______________ CARE ONE MANAGEMENT LLC, ET AL. Appellants v. UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, ET AL. ________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Class Certification [ECF No. 53], filed by Plaintiff Stephen Manno. For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that class certification is appropriate. Introduction Plaintiff Stephen Manno brought this putative c

Reverse and Render; Opinion Filed July 31, 2017. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01132-CV FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLP AND RICHARD A. WOLFE, Appellants V. MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 18-0228 ══════════ ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER, LP AND TEXAS HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE LLC, PETITIONERS, v. HOUSTON RED C LLC D/B/A IMAGEFIRST HEALTHCARE LAUNDRY SPECIALISTS, RESPONDENT

428 B.R. 117 (2010) In the matter of TCI 2 HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Debtors. No. 09-13654/JHW. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. April 12, 2010. *126 Michael F. Walsh, Esq., J. Philip Rosen, Esq., Ted S. Waksman, Esq., Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, New York, NY, for the Debtors. Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Esq., Jeffr

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 13, 2015 Session DANIEL RICHMOND V. VANGUARD HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 2013-CV-12702 Franklin L. Russell, Judge No. M2014-02461-COA-R3-CV – Filed January 29, 2016 The former administrator of an assisted living facility appeals the summary dism

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 19-3693 _______________ CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL., Appellants v. UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, ET AL. ________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. Before the Court are two motions to dismiss: a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction brought by Defendants U.S. Innovative Renewable Energy, LLC (USIRE), Xiaolin “Jerry” Zhang and Lu “Lucy” Zhang [29]; and a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on each of the nine counts in Plaintiff Ralls Corporation’s amended complaint brou

Affirmed in part; Reversed in part; and Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 27, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00319-CV NORTHERN FRAC PROPPANTS, II, LLC, LAMSTEX MATERIAL HANDLING, LLC, AND JEFFRIES ALSTON, Appellants V. 2011 NF HOLDINGS, LLC F/K/A NF HOLDINGS, LLC AN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 14-0538 ══════════ CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE GROUP HOLDING, INC., PETITIONER, v. NAUTIC MANAGEMENT VI, L.P., RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 13, 2024 Decided March 7, 2025 No. 23-1235 HOOD RIVER DISTILLERS, INC., PETITIONER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 23-1270 On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforce

Case: 21-1070 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 01/03/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC., AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD., AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC., DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, LTD., EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,

20-1044-cv Grand River Enterprises v. Boughton United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _________________ AUGUST TERM 2020 ARGUED: OCTOBER 15, 2020 DECIDED: FEBRUARY 8, 2021 NO. 20-1044-CV __________________ GRAND RIVER ENTERPRISES SIX NATIONS, LTD.,

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00248-CV ___________________________ GRANBURY SNF LLC D/B/A GRANBURY REHAB & NURSING, ADVANCED HCS LLC D/B/A ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, AND GRANBURY REHAB & NURSING GS LLC, Appellants V. NATALIE JACKSON, Ap

Case: 21-1070 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 01/03/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC., AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD., AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC., DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, LTD., EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant River Region Health Systems (“River Region”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket No. 60, its supporting brief, Docket No. 61, and its reply brief Docket No. 64. Plaintiff Catherine Davis (“Davis”) has filed her response, Docket No. 63, and the matter is ready for review. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED