⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Litigation Lawyers, Professional Association v. Harbison”

Olsen v. Harbisonpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2010-12-01 · Published · cited 40× · 191 Cal. App. 4th 325; 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 460; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 2161
Opinion HULL, J. This case involves a dispute between two attorneys over the division of fees. A client hired plaintiff Christopher J. Olsen to represent her in a personal injury action. Plaintiff subsequently brought in associate counsel, defendant Joseph F. Harbison III, doing business as Law Offices of Joseph F. Harbison & Associates. The client soon fired plaintiff and retained defendant. The case settl
District Court, E.D. New York · 2006-03-28 · Published · cited 29× · 424 F. Supp. 2d 488; 2006 WL 768673
424 F.Supp.2d 488 (2006) In re ZYPREXA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All Actions. No. 04-MD-01596 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 28, 2006. *489 Michael A London, Douglas & London, New York, NY, Jerrold S. Parker, Parker & Waichman, LLC, Great Neck, NY, Christopher A. Seege
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990-11-23 · Published · cited 464× · 916 F.2d 829
916 F.2d 829 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,184, 31 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 486 In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.BROWN, Christopher S. and Brown, Jacqueline Michell, h/wv.MONSANTO COMPANY, Southeastern Pennsylvania TransportationAuthority ("SEPTA"), National Railroad PassengerCorporation ("Amtrak"), and ConsolidatedRail Corporation ("Conrail")v.CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, United States of America,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004-08-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ) MIDD LE TE NNE SSEE , et al. ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) ) Davidso n Circuit VS. ) No. 92C-1672 ) DON SUNDQUIST, GOVERNOR ) OF THE STATE OF TENNE
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961-06-09 · Published · cited 2× · 362 S.W.2d 828; 50 Tenn. App. 567; 1961 Tenn. App. LEXIS 150
362 S.W.2d 828 (1961) TENNESSEE BAR ASSOCIATION v. Howard P. FREEMON. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section. June 9, 1961. Certiorari Denied December 8, 1961. *829 Kenneth Harwell, Nashville, and Joseph A. Freemon, Lawrenceburg, for appellant Howard P. Freemon. John H. Henderson, Franklin, W.J. Harbison, Jr., and J
Beatty v. Lumpkinpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-11-02 · Published · cited 6× · 52 F.4th 632
Case: 22-70010 Document: 00516530963 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/02/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 22-70010 November
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017-05-05 · Published · cited 38× · 244 So. 3d 896
STUART, Chief Justice. *903Aliant Bank, a division of USAmeribank ("Aliant"), sued various individuals and business entities involved in a failed effort to develop the Twelve Oaks subdivision in Odenville, alleging that, as a result of those defendants' conspiracy and wrongful actions, Aliant's security interest in the property upon which the
District Court, N.D. California · 2011-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 779 F. Supp. 2d 1085; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38659; 2011 WL 1225888
779 F.Supp.2d 1085 (2011) Bradford SHAFFER, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Chair and Committee Members, Management, Development and Compensation Committee, Board of Directors of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Defendants-Respondents. No. C 11-0303 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. Apr
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015-09-14 · Published · cited 2× · 130 F. Supp. 3d 1038; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121920; 2015 WL 5444133
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge Eric C. Deters is an attorney in Kentucky who has had a long’ and contentious relationship with the Kentucky Bar Association (KBA). At the time'his complaint was filed, he claimed that “at least 67 Bar Complaints” had been filed against him during his legal career and that he had “defeated” 61 of them. [R. 1 at -¶ 119.]
Court of Appeals of Alaska · 2022-11-18 · Published · cited 2× · 521 P.3d 592
NOTICE The text of this opinion can be corrected before the opinion is published in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are encouraged to bring typographical or other formal errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts: 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Fax: (907) 264-0878 E-mail: corrections@akcourts.gov IN THE C
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018-07-20 · Published · cited 5× · 321 F. Supp. 3d 830
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *832Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 67) concerning Vanderbilt University's ("Vanderbilt") Motion to Disqualify Neal & Harwell, PLC ("Neal & Harwell") from the representation of Defendant Ted S. Hasselbring (Doc.
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 314 Ga. 519
314 Ga. 519 FINAL COPY S21G1250. COE et al. v. PROSKAUER ROSE, LLP. MCMILLIAN, Justice. In 2002, Douglas Coe, Jacqueline Coe, and GFLIRB, LLC (collectively the “Coes”) were involved in the sale of a company in which they held a substantial interest, and their accountants, BDO Seidman, LLP (“BDO”),1 advised them of a proposed tax strategy in which the Coes could invest in distressed debt from a foreign company in order to offset their tax obligations. In connection w
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-07-27 · Published · cited 179× · 688 F.3d 290; 40 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2113; 2012 WL 3047238; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15513
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0231p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, - JOHN M. BERRY, JR.,
Montgomery v. Barrpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LISA MARIE MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-3261 (RDM) v. WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Lisa Montgomery was convicted of kidnapping resulting in death in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a) and
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014-06-30 · Published · cited 1× · 73 M.J. 738; 2014 WL 3056149; 2014 CCA LEXIS 383
PELOQUIN, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I join with Judge Saragosa concurring with the majority’s opinion except as to its finding that the appellant failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel in the sentencing phase of his court-martial. Because I believe trial defense counsel were ineffective by failing to investigate and present evidence of
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 20 N.E.3d 166; 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 533; 2014 WL 5493443
OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. John R. Vissing and Vissing, Grannan & Elston, LLC (í/k/a John R. Vissing, LLC) (collectively “Vissing”), appeal the order of the Clark Circuit Court denying Vissing’s motion to dismiss an attorney malpractice claim brought against Vissing by the Board of Commissioners of Clark County (“the County Commissioners”) and the Clark
Klayman v. Porterpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-3109 (RBW) ) JULIA PORTER, et al., )
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-06-13 · Published · cited 25× · 262 F. Supp. 3d 153
MEMORANDUM STENGEL, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This is a case, about litigation abuser— namely, the misuse of lawsuits for the improper purpose of harassment, delay, and obstruction. A few years ago, two. class actions were filed against GEICO General Insurance Company.in Washington state court. Not surprisingly, as in any litigation, a dispute arose about the u
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
05/28/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HARLAN V. FERGUSON, ALIAS HARLEY T. MARTIN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 108894 Bobby R. McGee, Judge 1
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 727 F. Supp. 2d 469; 98 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1180; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74001; 2010 WL 2928285
727 F.Supp.2d 469 (2010) SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC. d/b/a Jarden Consumer Solutions, Plaintiff, v. HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09cv791. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. July 22, 2010. *470 Paul Gennari, Paul D. Lall, Tremayne Norris, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Wa