Cases

Opinion BEAR, J. The plaintiff, Lisa Bruno, appeals from the summary judgment of the trial court holding that her claims against the defendants, Dalton Greiner Hartman Maher & Company, LLC (Dalton), Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. (Boston Financial), and Bruce Geller, co-president and chief executive officer of Dalton, were barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. On appeal, the p

410 B.R. 710 (2009) In re MONA LISA AT CELEBRATION, LLC, Debtor. Laura Bruno, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC, Westchester Fire Insurance Company, SunTrust Bank, and BankFirst, Defendants. Karen Dodsworth, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC, Westchester Fire Insurance Company, SunTrust Bank, and BankFirst, Defendants. Moire McKibbin, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mona Lisa at Celebration

909 A.2d 768 (2006) 388 N.J. Super. 539 Ronald J. BRUNO and Filomena Bruno; Nicholas Bonamassa and Barbara Bonamassa, On Behalf of Themselves and all others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARK MaGRANN ASSOCIATES, INC. d/b/a MaGrann Associates; Thermal Design, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, Thermal Design, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. U.S. Home Corporation, Third Party Defendant-Inter

515 F.3d 581 (2008) QUICK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., dba Quick Connect USA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; J. Peter Lark, Chairman; Robert B. Nelson, Commissioner; Laura Chappelle, Commissioner, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the Michigan Public Service Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-2103. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. <

OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs in this putative class action allege fraud and deceptive business practices by It’s Just Lunch International (“IJL”), a provider of personalized matchmaking services that operates nationally through franchises.1 Plaintiffs proposed that both a national class of plaintiffs and a New York class of plaintiffs

YOUNG, J. This case concerns judicial review of an administrative agency’s interpretation of a statute. This Court has not always been precise in articulating the proper standard for reviewing such interpretations. However, in accordance with longstanding Michigan precedent and basic separation of powers principles, we hold and reaffirm that an agency’s interpretation of a statute is entitled to “respectful consideration,” but co

268 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2003) T & E PASTORINO NURSERY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND MARKETING, L.L.C., et al., Defendants. And Other Consolidated Cases Nos. CV-02-2059-RHW, CCV-02-2176-RHW, CV-02-2178-RHW, CV-02-2180-RHW, CV-02-2181-RHW, C02-2182-RHW. United States District Court, S.D. California. May 19, 2003. *12

ENGEL, Circuit Judge. In this diversity action, Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. (Proctor) filed suit against United States Equipment Company (Equipment) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan seeking indemnity and damages for breach of contract. Specifically, Proctor claims Equipment must bear the cost

609 F.2d 248 27 UCC Rep.Serv. 612 William P. WELLS d/b/a Recmart, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,v.10-X MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. Nos. 77-1410, 77-1411. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued June 20, 1979.Decided Oct. 30, 1979.

147 Mich. App. 523 (1985) 382 N.W.2d 811 LOWE v. ESTATE MOTORS LIMITED Docket No. 73531. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided December 16, 1985. Gerald Tuchow Law Offices, P.C. (by Stephen J. Trahey), for plaintiff. Davidson, Gotshall, Kohl, Secrest, Wardle, Lynch & Clark (by Daniel P. King), for Estate Mo

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge Defendant Larry Paul Kunze a/k/a- Lorenzo Kunze1 sold his “family” business (Plaintiff Electrology Laboratory, Inc. (“ELI”), d/b/a ROCKY MOUNTAIN LASER COLLEGE (“RMLC”)) but couldn’t give it up. So, as the evidence revealed, even while negotiating the sale of ELI to the purchasers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARCIANN M. GRZADZINSKI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1411 (JEB) MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Marciann Grzadzinski was previously a Deputy General Counsel at the Federal Bureau of I

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

Motion to strike; torts; negligence per se; public policy; nuisance; reckless misconduct; intentional infliction of emotional distress; breach of contract; in action by plaintiffs against defendant, commercial service provider of internet access for named defendant, whose sister sent e-mail message which allegedly damaged plaintiffs, whether those counts of plaintiffs' complaint which alleged negligence, negligence per se, nuisance, reckless misconduct, intentional infliction of emotional dis

655 F.3d 78 (2011) Simon GLIK, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. John CUNNIFFE, in his individual capacity; Peter J. Savalis, in his individual capacity; Jerome Hall-Brewster, in his individual capacity; City of Boston, Defendants, Appellants. No. 10-1764. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 8, 2011. Decided August 26, 2011.

EDMONDSON, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by COLBERT, C.J. T1 This controversy is about the proper procedure to be used when a news organization invokes the Oklahoma Open Records Act, 51 0.8.2011 §§ 24A.1-24A.29. to gain access to a record that has been sealed and made confidential in a court proceeding where the news organization was not a party. 12 The petiti

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,

364 F.Supp.2d 468 (2005) In re MERCEDES-BENZ ANTI-TRUST LITIGATION. No. 99-4311 (WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 12, 2005. Lisa J. Rodriguez, Nicole M. Acchione, Trujillo Rodriguez & Richards, LLP, Haddonfield, NJ, for Petitioner. Richard Samuel Mazawey, Law Offices of Richard Mazawey, Clifton, NJ, for Movants. James J. Shrager, No

293 F.Supp.2d 305 (2003) Eric RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. George E. PATAKI, et al., Defendants. Howard T. Allen, et al., Plaintiffs, v. George E. Pataki, et al., Defendants. No. 02 CIV. 618 (RMBFM), 02 CIV. 3239 RMBFM. United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 22, 2003. *306

I .PETERS, J. In this workers’ compensation case, Home Health Care 2000, Inc. (Home Health)1 appeals a judgment in favor of its former employee, Teilla Noel, ordering reinstatement of Ms. Noel’s indemnity and medical benefits, awarding reimbursement for mileage expenses, awarding $9,000.00 in attorney fees, and holding that Ms. Noel did not violate the provisions of La.R.S. 23:1208. For the followi