Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lisa Jean Carlson”
State v. Carlsonpublic domain
Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Pierce County, Nos. 01-1-03854-2 and 01-1-03853-4, Lisa R. Wors-wick, J., entered May 23 and 27, 2003. Reversed by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Penoyar, J.
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Abshirepublic domain
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti
Springer v. Statepublic domain
KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Justin Springer was convicted of capital murder by a jury in the Circuit Court of Lee County on May 6, 2011. The underlying felony was burglary. For this conviction, he was sentenced to life in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, without the possibility of parole. After the trial court’s denial of his post-trial motions, Springer appealed to this C
State v. Millerpublic domain
998 A.2d 170 (2010) 121 Conn.App. 775 STATE of Connecticut v. Gregory Lamont MILLER. No. 30096. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 16, 2010. Decided June 15, 2010. Joseph Visone, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Nancy L. Walker, special deputy assistant state's attorney, with whom, on t
Simpson v. Millerpublic domain
GOULD, J., dissenting: ¶ 24 Arizona’s procedure for denying bail has one sole purpose: protecting children *216from persons charged with serious sex crimes. This same procedure has been used for over 200 years to protect the community from persons accused of committing dangerous, violent offenses. I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that Arizo
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYpublic domain
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
Hempel v. Creek House Trustpublic domain
743 N.W.2d 305 (2007) William J. HEMPEL, et al., Appellants, v. CREEK HOUSE TRUST, et al., Respondents, Judith Anna Ingemann f/k/a Judith Anna Seymour, Respondent, and all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real property described in the complaint here, Defendants. No. A06-2473. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 31, 2
Houghton v. Johnsonpublic domain
Perretta, J. This appeal arises out of the efforts of the defendant, Linda Jean Johnson, to prohibit the plaintiffs from using, for customary beach activities, the seaward portion of her property situated on Cape Cod Bay in Eastham under claims of implied and prescribed easements. In a detailed and comprehensive decision on cross motions for summary judgment, a Land Court judge concluded that Johnson’s property extended seaward
DATE: 03/16/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:44:17 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312015 GROUP 2 _____________________________________________________________________________
Mateo Cortez and the Estate of Doborah Cortez v. Linda Murray, Sucessor Trustee and Connie Lou Keith Barrypublic domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED Mateo Cortez and the Estate of Deborah Cortez, May 31, 2018 Defendant Below and Movant Below, Petitioners, released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYpublic domain
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. TASSIE KATHERINE
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
Beverati v. Smithpublic domain
Before WILKINS, Circuit Judge, ANDERSON, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation, and TRAXLER, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge ANDERSON and Judge TRAXLER joined. OPINION
Los Angeles Press Club v. Noempublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LOS ANGELES PRESS CLUB; No. 25-5975 NEWSGUILD - COMMUNICATIONS D.C. No. WORKERS OF AMERICA; SEAN 2:25-cv-05563- BECKNER-CARMITCHEL; RYANNE HDV-E MENA; LEXIS-OLIVIER RAY; CHARLES XU; BENJAMIN ADAM CLIMER; ABIGAIL OLMEDA, OP
Country Mutual Insurance Company v. Bible Pork, Inc.public domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bible Pork, Inc., 2015 IL App (5th) 140211 Appellate Court COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff- Caption Appellant, v. BIBLE PORK, INC., an Illinois Corporation, Defendant-Appellee (Ruth E. Pierson, Della K. Jones, Dale E. Jones, Shirley K. Atchison, Wi
Siana Oil & Gas Co., LLC v. Dublin Co.public domain
Jensen, Justice. *139 [¶ 1] Greggory Tank appeals from an amended judgment quieting title to royalty interests in property located in McKenzie County in favor of several of the defendants ("the defendants"). We reverse the district court's amended judgment quieting title to the royalty int
NUMBER 13-23-00491-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG NORMAN ROSS BECKEN, ET AL., Appellants, v. 1893 OIL & GAS, LTD. AND ELP2 MINERALS, LLC, Appellees.
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS 2, 3, AND 4 ROBERT J. FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge. In this adversary proceeding, the chapter 7 trustee of a company that operated a Ponzi scheme seeks to recover money transferred to the defendants. The plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment on December 9, 2011. Numerous defendants opposed the motion.
United States v. Careypublic domain
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-2-2004 USA v. Carey Precedential or Non-Precedential:
United States v. Crandellpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-29-2009 USA v. Crandell Precedential or Non-Precedenti