Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any FILED court except for the purpose of establishing Feb 28 2017, 6:48 am the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court estoppel, or the law of th

Lisa P. Page, Chief Judge Peggy Crawford ("Crawford") appeals the trial court's entry of partial summary judgment on three of her four counts against Distributor Operations, Inc. ("DOI"). We reverse and remand. BACKGROUND On May 30, 2002, DOI entered into a lease agreement with Crawford for two buildings, identified as building 2A and building 3 (collectively the "Property"), in Farm

PUBLISHED ORDER IMPOSING RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a “Verified Notice of Foreign Discipline and Petition for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause,” advising that Respondent was disciplined by the State of Illinois and requesting, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(28), that reciprocal discipline be imposed in this state. On March 5, 2013, this Court issue

FILED Jul 27 2016, 5:26 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APP

OPINION Mary K. Hoff, Judge George Aldridge (Aldridge) appeals pro se the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition for failure to state a claim against two corrections officers, Charla Francis and Jason Crawford (Officers). We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Aldridge is an o

OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph Kevin McKay, J. *330Defendant, Ernest Crawford, has submitted a pro se motion dated January 3, 2007 seeking to set aside his sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20. Defendant moves, as limited by his papers, to vacate his amended sentence and commitment form wherein a sentencing clerk substituted a period of five years’ postrele

200 S.W.3d 560 (2006) Deangelo CRAWFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. No. ED 86839. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. September 5, 2006. Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONCERNING DEADLINE FOR FILING OBJECTIONS TO DISCHARGE AND TO DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBTS WHEN CLERK OF COURT HAS AFFIRMATIVELY MISSTATED THE DEADLINE WESLEY W. STEEN, Bankruptcy Judge. In three separate motions, the parties to this bankruptcy case have postured for decision the determination of the deadline for objecting to discharge and to dis-chargeability of debts when the clerk

68 S.W.3d 406 (2002) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shelby A. CRAWFORD, Appellant. No. SC 84071. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. February 26, 2002. Rehearing Denied March 19, 2002. *407 Bruce W. Simon, Kansas City, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa M. Sutherland, Asst. Atty. G

515 F.Supp.2d 282 (2007) Bruce CRAWFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELECTRIC BOAT CORP. and United States of America, Defendants. No. 3:06CV01853(DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 5, 2007. *283 *284 Matthew Shafner, O'Brien, Shafner, Stuart, Kelly & Morris, Groton, CT

Opinion BORDEN, J. The dispositive issue of this appeal1 is whether the defendant, Jarrell Crawford, has presented *771a colorable claim of double jeopardy so as to permit him to pursue this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge of manslaughter in the first degree i

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination and retaliation action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. The co

Spina, J. The defendant, Michael L. Crawford, was convicted of the involuntary manslaughter of his girl friend and her unborn fetus. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Crawford, 417 Mass. 358 (1994). The defendant filed a postappeal “motion to correct sentences” under Mass. R. Crim. R 30 (a), 378 Mass. 900 (1979), claiming that double jeopardy principles under the Fifth and Fourteent

Davis, Justice: In this appeal from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“the Board”), Mr. William F. Crawford (“Mr. Crawford”), petitioner herein and claimant below, challenges the Board’s finding that he is not eligible to receive workers’ compensation benefits for an injury he sustained while he was an inmate participating in a work-release program.

* * * * * * * * * * * Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission affirms, with minor modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. * * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission finds as fact

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination and retaliation action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. The co

In re Crawford, Lisa; Crawford, Ricky et al.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangi-pahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2001-000480; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 0226. Denied.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 30, 2001 Session LISA HEATH v. MEMPHIS RADIOLOGICAL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, ET AL. A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 75928-9 T.D. The Honorable Robert L. Childers, Judge No. W2000-02770-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 6, 200

Opinion BAXTER, J. Standard comprehensive liability insurance policies provide that the insurer must both indemnify and defend the insured against claims within the scope of the policy coverage. The insurer’s duty to defend is broader than its duty to indemnify. The latter duty runs only to claims that are actually covered by the policy, while the duty to defend extends to claims that are merely potentially cov

DECISION {¶ 1} Lisa C. Ritchey filed this case requesting a writ of habeas corpus to cause her to be released from the Crawford County Jail. The case was referred to a magistrate to conduct appropriate proceedings. {¶ 2} The Crawford County Sheriff filed a motion to dismiss. The magistrate issued a report that the motion be sustained because the courts in Franklin County lack jurisdiction to