⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lisa A Pra”

California Supreme Court · 2017-07-20 · Published · cited 406× · 220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 770; 399 P.3d 1; 3 Cal. 5th 622
Chin, J. *624 The first clause of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)(1) ( section 300(b)(1) ) 1 authorizes a juvenile court to exercise dependency jurisdiction over a child if "[t]he child has suffered, or t
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0112p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiffs-Appellants, - LISA BRIDGE; WILLIAM W. BRIDGE, III,
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-06-05 · Published · cited 0× · 219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 674; 12 Cal. App. 5th 1264; 2017 WL 2417758; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 574
ALDRICH, J. *1269This writ proceeding returns to us on remand from the California Supreme Court. Real parties in interest the ACLU of Southern California and Eric Preven (collectively the ACLU) sought disclosure under the California Public Records Act (PRA) of billing invoices sent to petitioner the County of Los Angeles Board of Superviso
California Court of Appeal · 2017-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/5/17; on remand from Supreme Court; pub. order 6/22/17 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES No. B257230 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS et al., (Los Angeles County Petitioners, Super. Ct. No. BS145753) v. THE SUPER
California Supreme Court · 2016-12-29 · Published · cited 71× · 212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 107; 386 P.3d 773; 2 Cal. 5th 282; 2016 Cal. LEXIS 9629; 2016 D.A.R. 12
Cuéllar, J. *288 This case implicates both the public's interest in transparency and a public agency's interest in confidential communications with its legal counsel. The specific question we must resolve is whether invoices for work on currently pending litigation sent to the County of Lo
California Supreme Court · 2016-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/29/16 (reposted to delete inadvertent underlinings) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD ) OF SUPERVISORS et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) S226645 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/3 B257230 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
California Supreme Court · 2017-07-13 · Published · cited 231× · 220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 472; 3 Cal. 5th 531; 398 P.3d 69; 17 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6837; 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 687; 2017 WL 2980258; 2017 Cal. LEXIS 5124
**74 Werdegar, J. *537 This is a representative action seeking civil penalties on behalf of the State of California and aggrieved employees statewide for
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Opening a Private Road : for the Benefit of Timothy P. O'Reilly : Over Lands of (a) Hickory on the Green : Homeowners Association, and (b) Mary : Lou Sorbara; Gregory E. Burgunder; : Ann E. Cain; Don E. Cottrill & Norma J. : Cottrill, h/w; Joseph K. Cupples; James D. : Dragoo & Linda J. Dragoo, h/w; Kimberly : M. Fonzi; Brian J. Gallagher & Diane J. : Gallagher, h/w; Dolores
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012-12-28 · Published · cited 3× · 109 So. 3d 29; 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 0385; 2012 WL 7652794; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1766
JAMES F. McKAY III, Judge. The appellant, David M. Prados, appeals the ruling of the trial court holding him in direct contempt of court and ordering him to pay sanctions in the form of a fíne in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00), to the Judicial Expense Fund. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling and imposition of sanctions upon Mr. Pra-dos and affirm the trial court’s ruling. David M. Pra
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010-09-30 · Published · cited 25× · 5 A.3d 246; 607 Pa. 280; 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2272
5 A.3d 246 (2010) In the Matter of OPENING a PRIVATE ROAD FOR the BENEFIT OF Timothy P. O'REILLY Over Lands of (A) Hickory on the Green Homeowners Association, and (B) Mary Lou Sorbara; Gregory E. Burgunder; Ann E. Cain; Don E. Cottrill & Norma J. Cottrill, H/W; Joseph K. Cupples; Bart V. Delcimmuto; James D. Dragoo & Linda J. Dragoo, H/W; Kimberly M. Fonzi; Brian J. Gallagher & Diane J. Gallagher, H/W; Dolores M. Gembarosky; Michael J. Grali
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011-04-25 · Published · cited 9× · 29 A.3d 313; 422 N.J. Super. 387
29 A.3d 313 (2011) 422 N.J. Super. 387 Dean SMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUDSON COUNTY REGISTER and Willie J. Flood, in his capacity as the Hudson County Register, and Hudson County, through the Hudson County Board of Chosen Freeholders, Defendants-Respondents. Jeff Zeiger, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H
California Supreme Court · 2017-08-31 · Published · cited 16× · 221 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832; 400 P.3d 432; 3 Cal. 5th 1032; 2017 Cal. LEXIS 6768
Chin, J. *1036 Real parties in interest, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) of the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) of the County of Los Angeles (collectively, real parties) employ automated license plate reader (ALPR) technology in order to loca
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
PD-1133-15 PD-1133-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/31/2015 4:25:02 PM
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017-02-14 · Published · cited 10× · 235 F. Supp. 3d 876; 2017 WL 588496; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20773
MEMORANDUM OPINION . AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Commissioner of Social Security denied Plaintiff James Prater’s application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). Prater timely filed a Complaint seeking judicial review of that decision (Doc. 1). This Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). This case was referred to Magistrate Judge James Knepp f
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-08-17 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 Ohio 2842
[Cite as State ex rel. IdeaStream Pub. Media v. Cleveland, 2021-Ohio-2842.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL., IDEASTREAM PUBLIC MEDIA, : Relator, : No. 110345 v.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 Ohio 2843
[Cite as State ex rel. IdeaStream Pub. Media v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 2021-Ohio-2843.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL., IDEASTREAM PUBLIC MEDIA, : Relator, : No. 110346
Washington Supreme Court · 2010-10-07 · Published · cited 68× · 170 Wash. 2d 138
Alexander, J. ¶29 (dissenting) — The majority remands this case to the trial court with instructions to give the city of Shoreline (City) “the opportunity to inspect” the hard drive on Shoreline Deputy Mayor Maggie Fimia’s home *155computer so that the City can provide assurance that all of the records requested by Beth O’Neill have been received by her. Majority at 154.1 d
State v. Gillpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2012-02-14 · Published · cited 20× · 2012 MT 36; 364 Mont. 182; 2012 Mont. LEXIS 36; 272 P.3d 60
JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 J ames Gill entered a guilty plea in Missoula County Justice Court of Driving Under the Influence and Unlawful Possession after the Justice Court denied his motion to suppress. Gill appealed to the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula Coun
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00357-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/5/201
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-04-30 · Published · cited 102× · 681 F.3d 355; 2012 WL 1470146; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8671
STRANCH, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BARRETT, D.J., joined. CLAY, J. (pp. 364-67) delivered a separate opinion concurring in part. OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act was passed to protect consumers against both abusive and mistaken collection activity. This case reveals why. It began with seemingly innocuous accounting er