⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lis v. McKesson Corporation”

Ford v. Mckessonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-30494 Document: 85-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-30494 ____________
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-20 · Published · cited 20× · 606 U.S. 146; 145 S. Ct. 2006
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 606 U.S. 146
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 146–184 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 106 F. Supp. 3d 849; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63704
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This pharmaceutical multi-district litigation (“MDL”) action is pending for consideration of the plaintiffs’ motion for a suggestion of remand in the above-captioned cases. [MDL Record No. 3034] In each case, the plaintiffs argue that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(C)(1), entitles them to remand to the Uni
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009-07-14 · Published · cited 10× · 683 S.E.2d 336; 299 Ga. App. 91; 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2551; 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 841
683 S.E.2d 336 (2009) McKESSON CORPORATION et al. v. GREEN et al. (Three Cases). Gilbertson v. Green et al. (Three Cases). Gilbertson v. Hall Family Investments, L.P. et al. Nos. A09A0524 to A09A0530. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 14, 2009. Certiorari Denied October 19, 2009. *338 Morr
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005-03-07 · Published · cited 11× · 610 S.E.2d 54; 279 Ga. 95
610 S.E.2d 54 (2005) 279 Ga. 95 McKESSON CORPORATION et al. v. GREEN et al. Nos. S04G1228, S04G1229. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 7, 2005. *55 Joseph R. Manning, John Howell Williamson, Atlanta, for Appellant. H. Lamar Mixson, John G. Parker, Dorothy Y. Kirkley, Jill Anne Pryor, Jason Michael Fre
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2011-03-28 · Published · cited 5× · 784 F. Supp. 2d 664; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32581; 2011 WL 1158945
784 F.Supp.2d 664 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Thomas F. JAMISON, Plaintiffs v. McKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Cause No. 2:08CV214-SA-DAS. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division. March 28, 2011. *666 Albert Thomas Morris, Charles John Biro, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008-08-26 · Published · cited 23× · 539 F.3d 485; 383 U.S. App. D.C. 168; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18163; 2008 WL 3896712
539 F.3d 485 (2008) McKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Appellees v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Appellant. No. 07-7113. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 6, 2008. Decided August 26, 2008. *486 H. Thomas Byron III, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for amicus cu
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002-03-27 · Published · cited 27× · 562 S.E.2d 809; 254 Ga. App. 500; 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1073; 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 419
562 S.E.2d 809 (2002) 254 Ga. App. 500 McKESSON HBOC, INC. et al. v. ADLER. No. A01A1836. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 27, 2002. *811 Morris, Manning & Martin, Joseph R. Manning, John H. Williamson, Atlanta, Claudia M. Anders, Henderson & Lipscomb, David S. Lipscomb, Duluth, for appellants.</
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-05-18 · Published · cited 40× · 487 F.3d 897; 82 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1865; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11606; 2007 WL 1452731
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiff McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. (“McKesson”) appeals the final decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissing McKesson’s infringement suit against defendant Bridge Medical, Inc. (“Bridge”) after the court f
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 320 F.3d 280
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 1, 2001 Decided November 16, 2001 No. 00-7157 McKesson HBOC, Inc., et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Consolidated with
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 320 F.3d 280
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 1, 2001 Decided November 16, 2001 No. 00-7157 McKesson HBOC, Inc., et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Consolidated with
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001-11-16 · Published · cited 41× · 271 F.3d 1101; 348 U.S. App. D.C. 160; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24555; 2001 WL 1435530
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: McKesson HBOC, Inc., an American corporation, owns a minority interest in an Iranian dairy. Following Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, the dairy cut off the flow of capital and other material to McKesson, froze out McKesson’s board members, and stopped paying McKesson’s dividends. After years of litigation, including two appeals t
District Court, W.D. New York · 2000-06-26 · Published · cited 4× · 110 F. Supp. 2d 169; 2000 WL 967539
110 F.Supp.2d 169 (2000) McKINLEY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. McKESSON HBOC, INC., Defendant. No. 99-CV-398A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. June 26, 2000. *170 *171 Saperston & Day, P.C., Thomas F. Knab, of counsel, Buffalo, NY, for Plaintiff. Nixon, Peabody, LLP,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1822 Doc: 135-2 Filed: 03/18/2024 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1819 CITY OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION; CA
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BLASKET RENEWABLE : INVESTMENTS, LLC, : : Petitioner, : Civil Action No.: 23-2701 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 1, 13
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-08-13 · Published · cited 2× · 339 F.3d 1087
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. This case involves a novel securities fraud claim brought under state law. Essentially, McKesson HBOC is suing its own shareholders for unjust enrichment arising from a merger between McKesson and HBO & Company (“HBOC”). McKes-son claims that, the former HBOC shareholders are the beneficiaries of a windfall triggered by alleged accounting improprieties by HBOC. The shar
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-03-18 · Published · cited 9× · 96 F.4th 642
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1819 Doc: 137-2 Filed: 03/18/2024 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1819 CITY OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION; CA
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-07-30 · Published · cited 5× · 111 F.4th 12
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 19, 2023 Decided July 30, 2024 No. 21-7127 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, APPELLEE v. CORPORACION CIMEX, S.A. (CUBA), APPELLANT CORPORACION CIMEX, S.A. (PANAMA) AND UNION CUBA-PETROLEO, APPELLEES Consolidated
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEBANON COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT FUND and ) TEAMSTERS LOCAL 443 HEALTH ) SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0527-JTL ) AMERISOURCEBERGEN