Cases

BENTON, Circuit Judge. John P. Raynor sued the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation and a number of its officers and alleged co-conspirators in a qui tam action for violations of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33. On National Rural’s motion, the district court 1 dismissed the complaint with pr

MEMORANDUM OPINION and order SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge. Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29), filed July 3, 2014. After considering the motion, response, reply, summary judgment evidence, record, and applicable law, the court grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. Factual and Procedural Background This is

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2789 ___________________________ In re: In Re: Pre -Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litigation ------------------------------ Hartig Drug Company; Jason Moore’s Texaco, L.L.C., doing business as Moore’s Texaco; Mario Ortiz; Stephen Morrison; Steven

RUIZ, Senior Judge: Vicente Lazo was convicted of one count of misdemeanor sexual abuse, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3006 (2001). He makes three arguments on appeal: (1) that the charging document lacked particularity about the date and time of the alleged offense, and thus did not provide adequate notice to appellant of the charges against him; (2) that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to independently inq

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

105 Mich. App. 450 (1981) 306 N.W.2d 319 OSBORN v. FABATZ Docket No. 51686. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided February 24, 1981. Robert T. Hentchel, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for plaintiff. Horace W. Adams, for defendant. Before: N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and J.W. WARREN,[*] JJ. PE

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge.1 Jury deliberation is currently underway in the above-captioned case, in which plaintiff Evonne Davis sues defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company for injuries that allegedly resulted from defendants’ tortious conduct. The Court presumes familiarity with the expansive record and procedural histor

Appellant, James Edward Page, was indicted for the intentional killing of Lindsey Wayne Bradley, "by shooting him with a shotgun," in violation of § 13A-6-2, Code of Alabama 1975. The jury found appellant "guilty of murder as charged in the indictment," and following a sentencing hearing, the trial judge sentenced him to imprisonment for life in the penitentiary. The State's evidence showed that on April 11, 1984, at approximately 4:15 p.m., R

OPINION OF THE COURT Bernard J. Fried, J. Seeking the admission of expert testimony concerning eyewitness identification, the defendant has requested a pretrial ruling allowing such evidence at his retrial, following the declaration of a mistrial, on a charge of murder in the second degree. Specifically, what is sought to be introduced is the testimony of a psychologist, professor Roy S. Malpass, Departme

333 Mich. 122 (1952) 52 N.W.2d 626 PEOPLE v. PIASECKI. Calendar No. 45,005. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided April 7, 1952. Frank G. Millard, Attorney General, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, Gerald K. O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, Ralph Garber, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Garfield A. Nic

Action to recover liquidated or stipulated damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff is a Minnesota corporation, having its office and mill at Minneapolis, Minnesota, and engaged in the business of manufacturing, or milling, from Amber Durum wheat, a flour product, commonly known by the trade name of "Semolina." Defendant is a Missouri corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing macaroni, spaghetti and similar products, and, in the manufacture of such products, uses Semolina flour. O

143 S.E.2d 689 (1965) 265 N.C. 218 CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Trustee of the "Thomas L. Shepherd Fund" under the Last Will and Testament of W. T. Shepherd, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth O'Kelly BASS et al., Respondents. No. 768. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 27, 1965. *697 Cl

10/31/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 13, 2025 Session RUSSELL LEE MAZE and KAYE M. MAZE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 99-B-1308; 2002-D-2361 Steve R. Dozier, Judge No. M2024-00666-CCA-R3-PC

67 F.2d 345 (1933) ADERHOLD, Warden, v. MENEFEE. No. 6984. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 30, 1933. Clint W. Hager, U. S. Atty., and Hal Lindsay, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., and Leslie C. McNemar, Atty., Office of Judge Advocate General, Navy Department, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. Warren Cox, of Atlanta, Ga., for appel

108 N.J. Super. 248 (1969) 260 A.2d 863 MICHAEL SEIDEL, PLAINTIFF, v. ABRAHAM GREENBERG, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided December 24, 1969. *250 Mr. Ashley Goodman appeared for plaintiff (Messrs. Goodman & Goodman, attorneys). Mr. Harvey Weissbard appe

Battle, J. According to the well settled practice in this state the writ of certiorari can be used by the circuit court in the exercise of its appellate power and superintending control over inferior courts in the following classes- of cases: (1) Where the tribunal to which it is issued has exceeded its jurisdiction; (2) where the party applying for it had the right of appeal, but lost it- th

ACCEPTED 13-15-00024-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/6/2015 3:52:31 PM

9 A.3d 882 (2010) 204 N.J. 320 Lula M. HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; Hon. Clark E. Bruno, Acting Commissioner of Human Services; Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital; Gregory P. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer for Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital, Defendants-Respondents. A-69 September Term 2009. Supreme Court of New Jersey.