Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Linda S Withrow”
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Defendants, prison officials at the Michigan Reformatory, appeal the District Court’s order denying their post-answer motion to dismiss or for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. The District Court held that defendants waived their qualified immunity defense by failing to raise it in their pre-answer motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. De
Linda Salmon v. Rita M Tafelskipublic domain
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana FILED Linda Salmon, May 17 2024, 8:31 am Appellant-Defendant, CLERK Indiana Supreme Cour
Hedelito Garcia v. Linda Thomaspublic domain
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges CLIFTON, M. SMITH, and IKUTA join, dissenting: Hedelito Trinidad y Garcia, a Philippine national, stands accused by the Philippines of kidnaping for ransom. After Philippine authorities requested his extradition so that he might stand trial there for his crime — a request reviewed and approved by the Departments of State and Justice— he was arrested in Los Angeles
Hedelito Garcia v. Linda Thomaspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HEDELITO TRINIDAD Y GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellee, No. 09-56999 v. D.C. No. LINDA THOMAS,* Warden, 2:08-cv-07719- Metropolitan Detention Center-Los MMM-CW Angeles, OPINION Respondent-Appellant.
Stephen Fleming v. Linda Metrishpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0068p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellee, - STEPHEN MICHAEL FLEMING,
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Surrattpublic domain
102 S.W.3d 437 (2003) WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Linda Ruth SURRATT, Appellee. No. 11-02-00113-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. April 10, 2003. Rehearing Overruled May 8, 2003. *438 J. Woodfin Jones, Douglas W. Alexander, Scott, Douglass & McConnico, L.L.P., Attorneys At Law, Austin, and Mic
687 N.E.2d 575 (1997) Linda S. BARGA, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP, INC., Appellee-Garnishee Defendant, Gerald D. Siler and Fuqua Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., Judgment Defendants. No. 18A02-9610-CV-663. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 30, 1997. Rehearing Denied December 10, 1997. *576<
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: Anderson appeals from a magistrate judge’s order denying her motion for a new trial in her action against WoodCreek Venture, Ltd. and three of its employees (collectively, WoodCreek). Because the record casts into doubt whether Anderson voluntarily consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction to enter judgment as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(
At & T CORP. v. Sigalapublic domain
Benham, Justice, dissenting. Despite this Court’s holding in McCorkle v. Judges of Superior Court of Chatham County, 260 Ga. 315, 316 (392 SE2d 707) (1990), that “[t]he inherent power is not a sword but a shield,” the majority opinion in this case uses that power to pare away the constitutional and statutory jurisdiction of Georgia trial courts and to cut off from access to our courts persons who are e
Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
509 S.E.2d 1 (1998) 203 W.Va. 477 Robert L. MURRAY and Janet L. Murray, his wife; Bernie W. Rees and Julie A. Rees, his wife; and Robert J. Withrow, Plaintiffs below, Appellees, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation; Allstate Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation, Defendants below, Appellants, and Robert J. Harris, Defendant below, Appellee. Nos. 24759, 24760.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Breach of Contract; Department of Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. No. 95-91 (1977); Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-106 (1996); Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-258 (1976); Privileged Documents; Reliance Damages; Sanctions for “Bad Faith” Conduct During Discovery; Pub. L. No. 105-261 (1998); Restatement (Seoond) of Contracts §§ 344(b)
United States v. David S. Taylorpublic domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge: David S. Taylor appeals his 1991 conviction and sentence on two counts of sending threatening communications through the mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876. Taylor raises two issues related to his conviction, but those do not merit discussion. 1 He also raises issues related to his sentence, a
Tolley v. Monsanto Co.public domain
(2008) William TOLLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Mary Lou Brewer, Plaintiff, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Everette Hedrick, Plaintiff, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Chris Morris, Plaintiffs, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Robert Hedrick, Plaintiff, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Sandra Parri, Plaintiff, v. Mons
P.S. ex rel. Harbin v. W.S.public domain
PIVARNIK, Justice. This cause comes to us on a petition to transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals. The Marion Superior Court, Juvenile Division, refused to grant a permanent injunetion which would bar W.S., and P.S., (parents) from having their minor child, P.S., sterilized. The Court of Appeals, Second District, reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the cause with instructions to grant the injunction. P.S. b
Sarif v. Novare Group, Inc.public domain
703 S.E.2d 348 (2010) SARIF et al. v. NOVARE GROUP, INC. et al. No. A10A0972. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 10, 2010. *349 Weinstock & Scavo, Wallace H. Ehrenclou, James R. Fletcher II, Atlanta, for appellants. Troutman Sanders, William N. Withrow, Jr., Thomas E. Reilly, Brian P. Watt, Atlanta, for appellees.</
Larsen v. Union Bank, N.A.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT UNION BANK’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Union Bank’s Motion to Dismiss (DE # 1355), filed April 20, 2011. Therein, Defendant seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (DE # 1317), claiming both that 1) Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Natio
Novare Group, Inc. v. Sarifpublic domain
718 S.E.2d 304 (2011) 290 Ga. 186 NOVARE GROUP, INC., et al. v. SARIF et al. No. S11G0478. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 21, 2011. *306 Troutman Sanders, Thomas E. Reilly, Brian P. Watt, William N. Withrow, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant. Weinstock & Scavo, Atlanta, Michael Weinstock, Ehrenclo
In Re Checking Account Overdraft Litigationpublic domain
694 F.Supp.2d 1302 (2010) In re CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION, MDL No. 2036. Case No. 09MD02036JLK. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. Miami Division. March 11, 2010. *1304 Robert Cecil, Miami, FL, for Checking Account Overdraft Litigation. Jeremy William Alters, Kimberly Lynn Boldt, Alters, Boldt, Brown, Rash &am;
Weinstock v. Novare Group, Inc.public domain
710 S.E.2d 150 (2011) 309 Ga. App. 351 WEINSTOCK et al. v. NOVARE GROUP, INC. et al. No. A10A2214. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 28, 2011. Reconsideration Denied April 14, 2011. *152 Weinstock & Scavo, Wallace Hennen Ehrenclou, Atlanta, James Robert Fletcher II, for appellants.
USX Corp. v. TIECO, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HOPKINS, District Judge. The PlaintifflCounter Defendant, United States Steel Corporation (“USS”)1 and the Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs, TIECO, Inc., ATOZ Management, Inc., and Fletcher Yeilding (collectively “TIECO”), are in their ninth (9th) year of litigation arising from the discovery by USS that the USS’s Heather-wood golf course and its trac