⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Linda Jointer”

People v. Jointerpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989-03-03 · Published · cited 2× · 180 Ill. App. 3d 364; 129 Ill. Dec. 274; 535 N.E.2d 1039; 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 244
JUSTICE LORENZ delivered the opinion of the court: Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of burglary (111. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 19 — 1) of a Conrail Corporation (Conrail) railroad freight car and was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant raises the following points in favor of reversal: evidence produced at trial was insufficient to
United States Court of International Trade · 1997-07-08 · Published · cited 10× · 974 F. Supp. 770; 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 734; 21 C.I.T. 734; 19 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1844; 1997 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 92
974 F.Supp. 770 (1997) MAKITA CORPORATION, Makita U.S.A., Inc., and Makita Corporation of America, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, and United States Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration), Defendants, and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Intervenor-Defendant. MAKITA CORPORATION, Makita U.S.A., Inc., and Makita Corporation of America, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, and United States Intern
People v. Kiddpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1996-12-19 · Published · cited 184× · 675 N.E.2d 910; 175 Ill. 2d 1; 221 Ill. Dec. 486; 1996 Ill. LEXIS 132
JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, the defendant, Leonard Kidd, was convicted of four counts of murder, one count of armed robbery, one count of aggravated arson, and four counts of concealment of a homicidal death. At a separate sentencing heari
People v. Kiddpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1996-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: Under Supreme Court Rule 367 a party has 21 days after the filing of the opinion to request a rehearing. Also, opinions are subject to modification, correction or withdrawal at anytime prior to issuance of the mandate by the Clerk of the Court. Therefore, because the following slip opinion is being made available prior to the Court's final action in this matter, it
Oregon Supreme Court · 1955-04-06 · Published · cited 31× · 281 P.2d 707; 204 Or. 393; 1955 Ore. LEXIS 250
204 Or. 393 (1955) 281 P.2d 707 STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. SUPERBILT MANUFACTURING CO., INC Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued March 2, 1955. Reversed and remanded April 6, 1955. Petition for rehearing denied May 11, 1955. *395 Charles Peterson, of Portland, argued the cause for appel