Cases

WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Richard Gardner died leaving a will that devised his entire- estate to his wife, Mae Otha Gardner. An estate was opened and later declared- insolvent. However, a fire destroyed a building owned by the estate, and insurance proceeds were sufficient to pay the estate’s debts and leave a surplus for Mae Otha. At that point, Richa

OPINION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNT III AND IV AND DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL MOTIONS TO STRIKE THE COMPLAINT (Docs. 44, 42, 38 & 48) GEOFFREY W. CRAWFORD, District Judge. Pending before the court are four motions filed by the various defendants in this case. The first and second are motions filed by defendants Jeff Kauffman and Carol Kauffman (Doc. 38), and John Ca

Opinion and Order William K. Sessions III, District Court Judge Plaintiffs Ernest Simuro and Simuro on behalf of his grandson, K.S., bring the present action against Defendants Linda Shedd, a former sergeant of the Windsor Police Department, the Town of Windsor, and Does I through X.1 In their amended complaint, Plaintiffs assert a number of claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 an

DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge. Feuding over local governance matters in Addison, Vermont led two couples— John and Linda Carrigan (the “Carri-gans”) and Jeff and Carol Kauffman (the “Kauffmans”)—to make allegedly defamatory statements about a third couple, Barbara Ernst and Barbara Supeno. Ms. Ernst and Ms. Supeno sued for defamation (among other claims) and the Carrigans and Kauffmans responded by filing special motions to s

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2017 VT 83

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2017 VT 83

11 B.R. 141 (1980) In re Arnold Jay NORTON, Jr., and Linda Ann Norton, Debtors. RUTLAND SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Arnold Jay NORTON, Jr., and Linda Ann Norton, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 79-00193, Adv. Proceeding No. 79-0006. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont. July 22, 1980. *142 E. Patrick Burke, Rutland, Vt. of R

786 F.Supp. 397 (1992) Michael O'NEILL and Linda O'Neill v. BERKSHIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Civ. A. No. 91-18. United States District Court, D. Vermont. March 26, 1992. Robert J. O'Rourke, Ryan, Smith and Carbine, Ltd., Rutland, Vt., for plaintiffs. John J. Boylan, III, Kiel and Boylan, Springfield, Vt., for defendant. OPINION AND ORDER

996 F.2d 1121 62 USLW 2076, 39 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 724 Robert D. POWERS; Gary W. Swain; Rebecca Graddy, allindividually and on behalf of all persons inBarbour County, Alabama, similarlysituated, Plaintiffs-Appellantsv.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.Joe L. GLENN; Sarah Glenn; William M. Hagan and OuidaHagan, and all persons in Montgomery County, Alabama,similarly situated

821 F.Supp. 916 (1993) Linda FOUCHER, Plaintiff, v. FIRST VERMONT BANK & TRUST CO., and Charles J. Marro, Administrator, C.T.A. of the Estate of Raymond Reilly, Sr., Defendants. FIRST VERMONT BANK & TRUST CO., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Charles J. MARRO, Administrator, C.T.A. of the Estate of Raymond Reilly, Sr., Third-Party Defendant. File No. 2:91-CV-404. United States District Cou

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge, concurring. This case involves a lengthy trial transcript in which’the testimony was extremely unreliable and contradictory.' Iii this case, we are fortunate that the conflicting testimony is largely irrelevant to the question presented. Rather than venture into that bramble and risk misstatements, I focus only on the circumstances surrounding the three statements that McGirt made

Peters, P.J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Pines, J.), entered May 10, 2016, which, among other things, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of a son (bo

369 F.3d 293 In re: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATIONLinda Smart, a class member who has exercised her intermediate opt-out rights AppellantIn re: Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability LitigationClara Clark, Linda Smart, George M. Fleming, Fleming & Associates, L.L.P., Mike O'Brien and Michael C. Abbott, AppellantsIn re: Diet Drugs (Phentermine/

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, David Harrison Biro ("Mr. Biro"), in Case No. 2006-L-068, appeals from a judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, in which the trial court granted appellee, Linda Biro (now known as "Ms. Tsuda") a divorce, divided the parties' property and debts, and awarded spousal support. In Case No. 2006-L-236, appellant appeals from a judgment of the Lak

644 F.Supp. 31 (1986) ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth CANNON; Louise L. Jackson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Larry James; Ernestine Dennis, Individually and as Next Friend of David W. Dennis; Robert Dennis; Richard Williams; Eddie Gaines; Lance Rutland; Jerome Rutland; and Linda Rutland, Defendants. Civ. No. 85-CV-72245-DT. Unite

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge: The government appeals pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 from an order of the District of Vermont, entered on May 19, 1982 by Chief Judge James S. Holden after an evidentiary hearing, dismissing an indictment charging the three defendants-appellees in seven counts with violations of provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), and with c

612 S.E.2d 513 (2005) 272 Ga. App. 397 BULLARD v. BOULER et al. No. A05A0525. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 11, 2005. Reconsideration Denied March 23, 2005. *515 Linda Bullard, Dunwoody, pro se. William Temple, Temple, Strickland Counts & Dinges, Decatur, Frederick Johnson,

7ermont Superior Court Filed 12/05/24 Chittenden UUnit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Chittenden Unit

CARLTON, J., dissenting: ¶ 35. I respectfully dissent, and I would affirm the conviction and sentence. ¶ 36. The record reflects that sufficient evidence existed in the present case to support the jury verdict, especially in light of our standard of review, where this Court must construe all evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. McFee v. State, 511 So.2d 130, 133 (Mis

ORDER Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge Plaintiff Linda Mohr is the wastewater clerk in the office of the clerk-treasurer of the City of Beech Grove (“the City”). Plaintiff Julie Lockwood is the administrative assistant to the Mayor of Beech Grove, Dennis Buckley (“Mayor Buckley”). Defendant Dan McMillan was elected clerk-treasurer of Beech' Grove in 2011 and took office in January 2012. The Plaintiffs alle