⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Linda Dianne Baldwin”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996-05-23 · Published · cited 872× · 84 F.3d 734; 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1167; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11815; 1996 WL 273523
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: In what may be the largest class action ever attempted in federal court, the district court in this case embarked “on a road certainly less traveled, if ever taken at all,” Castano v. American Tobacco Co., 160 F.R.D. 544, 560 (E.D.La.1995) (citing EDWARD C. Latham, The Poetry of Robert Frost, “The Road Not Taken” 10
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Houser and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Houser and enters the following Opinion and Award:
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing Sep 08 2017, 7:06 am the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2001-09-05 · Published · cited 0×
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Taylor. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parti
Simba v. Brittpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 212 F. App'x 202
PER CURIAM: Ya Jelani Simba seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his § 1983 complaint without prejudice and the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011-08-22 · Published · cited 7× · 809 F. Supp. 2d 636; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93793; 2011 WL 3665139
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge. Imagine walking outside every morning and finding a layer of black, soot-like dust on your home, car, and yard. You wipe it away, but it returns. Your children return from outside with black streaks on their clothes. You can no longer use your swimming pool because of the dust. Close to your home is a coal processing plant. You realize that your
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-12-27 · Published · cited 5× · 484 B.R. 252; 2012 WL 6720786; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5911
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The matters before the Court are the “Fifty-Third and Final Application for Allowance of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses by Andrews Kurth LLP Attorneys for the Chapter 7 Trustee” 1 (the “AK Application”) filed by Andrews Kurth LLP (“Andrews Kurth”), counsel t
Simba v. Brittpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 212 F. App'x 204
PER CURIAM: Ya Jelani Simba seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his § 1983 complaint without prejudice to filing a new complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999-02-17 · Published · cited 4× · 36 F. Supp. 2d 46; 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 328; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1650; 1999 WL 80948
36 F.Supp.2d 46 (1999) Nancy AXELROD and Nicholas Axelrod Panagopoulos, Plaintiffs, v. PHILLIPS ACADEMY, ANDOVER, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 99-10054-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 17, 1999. *47 Marc Redlich, Law Offices of Marc Redlich, Boston, MA, Merle Ruth Hass, Law Offices of Marc Redlich, Boston, M
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003-09-18 · Published · cited 2× · 284 F. Supp. 2d 204; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17223; 2003 WL 22247172
*208 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves disputes stemming from the Master Settlement Agreement (“Master Agreement”) in the coordinated litigation against this country’s major tobacco manufacturers. The Plaintiff, Richard Daynard (“Daynard”) sued Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson &
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Fuleihan and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award, with the exception of some modifications due to the length of the Deputy's decision, and a modification with regard to a c
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989-12-04 · Published · cited 33× · 108 B.R. 299; 29 Fed. R. Serv. 764; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14483
108 B.R. 299 (1989) Bobbie G. BAYLESS, Trustee on Behalf of the Bankruptcy Estates of Freeman Dale Crabtree, Linda Catherine Crabtree, the Orchard Company, Catherine Dianne Crabtree Trust and David Lynn Crabtree Trust, Plaintiffs, v. Catherine Dianne CRABTREE, Through Catherine ADAMS Guardian of Her Estate and David Lynn Crabtree, Defendant. Adv. No. 88-0281-TS, Bankruptcy Nos. 87-9110-TS, 87-9114-TS, No. CIV-89-1337-A.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-04-18 · Published · cited 221× · 821 F.3d 410; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 615; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 6908; 2016 WL 1552205
OPINIÓN OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge.- TABLE OF CONTENTS I.INTRODUCTION............,.............:................../.......:. 420 II.BACKGROUND...............................................•........'..421 A Concussion Suits Are Brought Against the NFL.......................
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003-09-18 · Published · cited 2× · 284 F. Supp. 2d 204
284 F.Supp.2d 204 (2003) Richard A. DAYNARD, Plaintiff, v. NESS, MOTLEY, LOADHOLT, RICHARDSON & POOLE, P.A.; Ronald Motley; Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent, P.A.; and Richard F. Scruggs, Defendant-Plaintiffs, v. Castano Plaintiffs Legal Committee a/k/a Castano Group; William Baggett; Baggett, McCall & Burgess; Jack M. Bailey, Jr.; Law Offices of Jack M. Bailey, Jr.; Scott Baldwin; Baldwin, Baldwin & Baldwin; Daniel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999-04-12 · Published · cited 10× · 46 F. Supp. 2d 72; 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1671; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5691; 1999 WL 219464
46 F.Supp.2d 72 (1999) Nancy AXELROD and Nicholas Axelrod Panagopoulos, Plaintiffs, v. PHILLIPS ACADEMY, ANDOVER, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 99-10054-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 12, 1999. *73 *74 Marc Redlich, Merle Ruth Hass, Law Offices of Marc Redlich, Boston, MA,
Ohio Supreme Court · 2002-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2002 Ohio 3343
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 206 B.R. 252; 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 129; 1997 WL 65799
206 B.R. 252 (1997) In the Matter of SKINNER GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors. Bankruptcy No. N96-11349-WHD through N96-11380. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Newnan Division. February 10, 1997. *253 *254 *255 Alfred S. Lurey, Dennis S. Meir, C. Ray Mulli
California Supreme Court · 2008-05-15 · Published · cited 139× · 43 Cal. 4th 757; 183 P.3d 384
43 Cal.4th 757 (2008) In re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals.][1] No. S147999. Supreme Court of California. May 15, 2008. *765 Alliance Defense Fund, Benjamin W. Bull, Glen Lavy, Timothy Donald Chandler, Christopher R. Stovall, Dale Schowengerdt; Advocates for Faith and Freedom, Robert Henry Tyler; Law Offices of Terr
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM M. SCHOOLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 17-1376 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. ME