Cases

Matter of Pittman v Adelphi Univ. (2025 NY Slip Op 04484) Matter of Pittman v Adelphi Univ. 2025 NY Slip Op 04484 Decided on July 30, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

38 F.3d 1219NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Samuel SAVAGE, Brian Keith Pitchford, and Cheryl LeticiaBly, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92

People v Cousar (2021 NY Slip Op 00573) People v Cousar 2021 NY Slip Op 00573 Decided on February 3, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Matter of O'Connor & Son's Home Improvement, LLC v Acevedo (2021 NY Slip Op 04915) Matter of O'Connor & Son's Home Improvement, LLC v Acevedo 2021 NY Slip Op 04915 Decided on September 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department

WILBUR, Justice. [¶ 1.] The circuit court entered judgment for Defendant, Dr. Linda Peterson. Plaintiff, Lita St. John, appeals the judgment and challenges the court’s ruling that certain evidence was not relevant and, therefore, was inadmissible. We affirm. Background [¶ 2.] This is the third appeal of this medical malpractice actio

Owens, J. ¶1 Linda Mohr suffered a trauma-induced stroke and is now permanently disabled. She and her husband, Charles, claim that negligent treatment by her health care providers diminished her chances of avoiding or greatly minimizing her disability. In other words, they claim that negligence caused Mrs. Mohr a loss of the chance of a better outcome. In Herskovits v. Group Health Coop

DATE: 11/18/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 12:45:21 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302016 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

903 F.Supp. 182 (1995) Patricia SINISCALCHI, et al. v. SHOP-RITE SUPERMARKETS, INC. Civ. A. No. 94-30133-MAP. United States District Court, for the District of Massachusetts. August 23, 1995. *183 Charles R. Casartello, Jr., Pellegrini & Seeley, Springfield, MA, for Patricia Siniscalchi. Richard J. Maloney, Thomas E. S

427 F.Supp.2d 768 (2006) Leon "Danny" DICK-FRIEDMAN, by and through his mother, Linda FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WEST BLOOMFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS and Susan Liebetreau, Defendants. No. Civ. 04-60047. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 11, 2006. *769

842 N.E.2d 674 (2005) 218 Ill.2d 104 299 Ill.Dec. 637 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Marcel NICHOLAS, Appellee. No. 98965. Supreme Court of Illinois. December 1, 2005. As Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing January 23, 2006. *676 Lisa Madigan, Atto

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. The Tennessee Commissioner of Finance and Administration (“the state” or “Tennessee”) appeals from two orders of the district court issued as part of an ongoing suit challenging the administration of Tennessee’s TennCare program. The first order, issued on September 14, 2001 (“the September order”), required the state to take various steps to comply with

288 F.3d 918 Michael ROSEN; Barbara Huskey; Emanuel Martin, by his next friend Cheryl Martin; Wanda Campbell; Connie Hoilman; Mark Hughes; Jacob B., by his next friend Martin B.; Jackie Baggett; Brenda Clabo, and Pradie Tibbs, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.TENNESSEE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-6324.

PARRISH, Chief Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority opinion in a number of respects. Foremost, I believe that the majority opinion fails to identify the real issue that the parties to this appeal have attempted to litigate. In my opinion, the underlying issue in each of the four cases that somehow reached this court as a single appeal1 is the ownershi

987 F.Supp. 1206 (1997) Romula FONTANILLA, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. No. C-96-3916 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. November 14, 1997. *1207 *1208 Sheila A. Reid, Prentice & Scott, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. Vicki A

ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th days of February, 2015, the Court held a bench trial in the above-styled cause, and the parties appeared in person and through counsel. During trial, the Court heard testimony from the following witnesses: Robin Lorie DeSalvo; Karen Calabrese; Margueriette Schmoll; Rita Valdez; Cynthia Cantu; Cordelia Garcia; Shelly Cattoo

27 F.Supp.2d 1149 (1998) WISCONSIN BELL, INC. d/b/a Ameritech Wisconsin, Plaintiff, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN, and Cheryl L. Parrino, Daniel J. Eastman, and Joseph P. Mettner, Defendants. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Wisconsin, Plaintiff, v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, and Cheryl L. Parrino, Daniel J. Eastman, and Joseph P. Mettner, in their official capacities as members of the Commission, and<

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1159 MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. 6.56 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY SANDRA TOWNES POWELL, Montgomery County Tax Map Parcel No. 015900 and being MVP Parcel No. VA-MO-3370; 1.81 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY ROBERT M. JONES AND DONNA THOMAS JONES, Montgomery County

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si