⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lillie R. Thomas”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-11-01 · Published · cited 1× · 235 So. 3d 1139
GUIDRY, J. |aA state agency appeals a trial court’s judgment certifying as a class action the plaintiffs’ negligence claims premised on allegations that the agency’s failure to properly perform its regulatory duties contributed to the injuries they sustained as a result of a -fraudulent investment scheme perpetrated by an individual affiliated with 'a regulated entity.
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2015-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 27 Vet. App. 329; 2015 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 610; 2015 WL 2165103
SCHOELEN, Judge: The appellant, Lillie M. Wingard, the daughter of the deceased veteran, Charlie N. Wingard, appealed a January 11, 2011, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied non-service-connected burial benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 2302. On August 16, 2013, this Court affirmed the Board’s decision. Wingard v. Shinseki 26 Vet.App. 334
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013-08-16 · Published · cited 0× · 26 Vet. App. 334; 2013 WL 4401367; 2013 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1372
SCHOELEN, Judge: The appellant, Lillie M. Wingard, the daughter of the deceased veteran, Charlie N. Wingard, appeals through counsel a January 11, 2011, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that denied non-service-connected burial benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 2302. Record of Proceedings (R.) at 3-11. 1 This ap
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007-06-08 · Published · cited 26× · 645 S.E.2d 436; 274 Va. 76; 2007 Va. LEXIS 85
OPINION BY Justice ELIZABETH B. LACY. In this appeal we consider whether the circuit court erred in refusing to apply the law of the jurisdiction stipulated in the choice of law provision of a contract and in its application of Virginia's usury law to the provisions of that contract. FACTS On November 12, 1996, Carla Von Neumann-Lillie (Lillie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 01569
Cedar Capital Mgt. Group Inc v Lillie (2025 NY Slip Op 01569) Cedar Capital Mgt. Group Inc v Lillie 2025 NY Slip Op 01569 Decided on March 18, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
State v. Lilliepublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-07-10 · Published · cited 2× · 2018 Ohio 2714
[Cite as State v. Lillie, 2018-Ohio-2714.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992-08-25 · Published · cited 8× · 977 F.2d 208; 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 89; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20760; 1992 WL 281931
MILBURN, Circuit Judge. Defendant Thomas R. Hochschild appeals his conviction for criminal contempt in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). After a bench trial before District Judge David Dowd, he was convicted of failing to carry out certain court orders contained in a preliminary injunction and was sentenced to 120 days imprisonment. On appeal, defendant argues (1) that he was not
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013-01-16 · Published · cited 0× · 254 Or. App. 621; 296 P.3d 561; 2013 WL 174411; 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 16
BREWER, J., pro tempore These consolidated appeals arise from circuit court judgments affirming two orders in other than contested cases that were issued by the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) pursuant to ORS 195.305 to 195.318 (Measure 49). We affirm. We begin by describing the legal framework that provides the necessary context for understanding DLCD’s orders and the parties’ content
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00650-COA SHARON RICHARDSON APPELLANT v. THE ESTATE OF THOMAS JAMES APPELLEES RICHARDSON, SR., LILLIE RICHARDSON, THOMAS JAMES RICHARDSON, JR., TOCHA RICHARDSON NDAO, SAMUEL RICHARDSON, ANTONIO RICHARDSON AND ISAIAH THOMAS RICHARDSON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/1
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2022-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21-1393 Filed July 20, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JEAN LYNN LILLIE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Mark C. Cord, District Associate Judge. A defendant appeals her conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon, an aggr
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2016-04-13 · Published · cited 7× · 491 S.W.3d 890; 2016 WL 1465691; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3811
OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice Plaintiffs Waterblasting Technologies, Inc. and Thomas G. Wicker, Jr. sued the City of El Paso, the,Mayor,'.and the City Council (collectively, the “City”), seeking a declaration that a bid contract the City awarded was void,, as well as an injunction preventing performance of the contract. The City filed a
Lara v. Thomaspublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994-02-23 · Published · cited 101× · 512 N.W.2d 777; 1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1475; 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 36; 1994 WL 54046
512 N.W.2d 777 (1994) Rebecca LARA, Appellee, v. Charles THOMAS, d/b/a Fort Dodge Animal Hospital, Appellant. No. 92-1936. Supreme Court of Iowa. February 23, 1994. *780 Christopher R. Pose of Connolly, O'Malley, Lillis, Hansen & Olson, Des Moines, for appellant. Richard M. LaJeunesse of Hansel & LaJeunesse, Des Mo
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed December 22, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00137-CV RUSSELL TODD THOMAS, Appellant V. DEBORAH ELAINE THOMAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County
Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2023-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED JAMES B., April 10, 2023 Petitioner Below, Petitioner EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
Thomas v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2024-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 902 S.E.2d 566; 319 Ga. 123
319 Ga. 123 FINAL COPY S24A0174. THOMAS v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. This Court granted the interlocutory application of Tyler Jarel Thomas, who timely sought review of a trial court order that vacated its earlier grant of his motion to suppress. Thomas argues that the end-of-term rule, which we have held imposes a term-based time restriction on a trial court’s authority over its interlocutory orders in criminal cases, should have barred the tri
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2023-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN RE INTEREST OF IVY R. ET AL. NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). IN RE INTEREST OF IVY R. ET AL., CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE. STATE
Logan v. Lilliepublic domain
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 753 A.2d 322; 2000 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 300
COLINS, Judge. Appellant Brian M. Puricelli, Esquire (Puricelli), former attorney for Appellant Thomas Scott Logan in the above-captioned matter, appeals from the May 20, 1999 order of the Court of Common Pleas *323of Bucks County (Trial Court) directing both Appellants, jointly and severally, to pay the sum of $7,580.58 to Suzanne Logan as reimbursement for costs and
Eubank v. Thomaspublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2021-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
PRESENT: All the Justices CANDY EUBANK, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 201118 JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH August 5, 2021 SUE K. THOMAS, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MATHEWS COUNTY William H. Shaw, III, Judge Designate Candy and Mark Eubank filed a complaint against the County Administ
Logan v. Lilliepublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997-05-27 · Published · cited 13× · 965 F. Supp. 695; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7451; 1997 WL 288698
965 F.Supp. 695 (1997) Thomas Scott LOGAN, Plaintiff, v. Debra K. LILLIE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-6575. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 27, 1997. *696 Brian M. Puricelli, Law Offices of Brian M. Puricelli, Washington Crossing, PA, for Thomas Scott Logan. Howard M. Holmes, Administrative
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994-06-13 · Published · cited 0× · 214 Ga. App. 181; 446 S.E.2d 745; 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2433; 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 733
Judge Harold R. Banke. In 1990 the Thomas County Board of Tax Assessors began reappraising rural property within the county, emphasizing location of the property as. a determinant of value. The reappraisals generated several tax appeals by landowners which were unsuccessful before the Board of Equalization. However, the superior court concluded that the new method of appraisal impermissibly subclassified rural property and v