Cases

GUIDRY, J. |aA state agency appeals a trial court’s judgment certifying as a class action the plaintiffs’ negligence claims premised on allegations that the agency’s failure to properly perform its regulatory duties contributed to the injuries they sustained as a result of a -fraudulent investment scheme perpetrated by an individual affiliated with 'a regulated entity.

Cedar Capital Mgt. Group Inc v Lillie (2025 NY Slip Op 01569) Cedar Capital Mgt. Group Inc v Lillie 2025 NY Slip Op 01569 Decided on March 18, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Manuel Welch, an unsuccessful black candidate for a supervisor’s post in Copiah County, Mississippi, and three black voters appeal an adverse judgment entered after a bench trial of their suit under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973, and the Fourteenth an

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 325 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-22-762 OCNC, INC. D/B/A SILVER OAKS Opinion Delivered May 22, 2024 HEALTH AND REHABILITATION APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE OUACHITA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [No. 52CV-20-184] V. HONOR

DAVIS, Justice: In this criminal appeal, the-petitioner herein and defendant below, Lillie Mae Trail (“Ms. Trail”), challenges her conviction by jury of murder in the first degree and her sentence of life without mercy. 1 Ms. Trail herein alleges the following errors: (1) jury misconduct; (2) application of erroneous evi-

188 P.3d 321 (2008) 220 Or. App. 552 David POVEY, Lavonne Povey, and Owen Minnick, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MOSIER, an Oregon municipal corporation, Defendant-Respondent. 0500283CC; A133868. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted March 12, 2008. Decided June 18, 2008. *322

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 446 This appeal again raises the difficult and troubling questions of the rights, duties, and equities of the parties in a parentage action. The parties in this case are Elva Snider, the mother, her daughter Rita Snider, now an adult, and Jack A. Lillie, Jr., Rita's biological father.

laCANNELLA, Judge. Defendant/taxing authority, the St. Charles Parish School Board (St. Charles), appeals from the summary judgment granted by the trial court in favor of Plaintiffs/taxpayers, Archer Daniels Midland Company, ADM/Growmark River Systems, Inc. and Tulane Fleeting (Taxpayers), ordering St. Charles to refund the taxes paid by the Taxpayers under protest plus interest. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-00465-SCT IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP OF RESHAN DANIELLE HOLMES, A MINOR: BAUHAUS USA, INC. v. LILLIE REGINA HOLMES COPELAND, NATURAL GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF RESHAN DANIELLE HOLMES, A MINOR, BANCORPSOUTH BANK AND BILL BENSON, CHANCERY CLERK DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/7/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TALMADGE D. LITTLEJOHN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LEE

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. Regina Daniels, a former United Parcel Service dispatcher who worked in UPS’s Kansas City, Kansas facility, brought suit against UPS alleging discrimination based on her sex and age. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of UPS, and Daniels appeals. We conclude the district court did not err in finding (1) most of Daniels’s discrimination c

Opinion & Order WOOD, District Judge. Plaintiff Ancile Investment Company (“Ancile”) filed the above-captioned action on November 5, 2008, against Defendant Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”), seeking damages for alleged violations of Brazilian and state law. [Dkt. No. 1]. After granting ADM’s motion to *318dismiss Andie's state

503 F.3d 610 (2007) SANCHEZ & DANIELS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John KORESKO and Koresko & Associates, P.C., Defendants-Appellants, v. Clinton Krislov, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-1228. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 7, 2007. Decided September 24, 2007.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 9, 2002 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LILLIE FRAN FERGUSON Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 99-938 Roger A. Page, Judge No. W2002-00638-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 19, 2002 After entering a guilty plea, the defendant reserved certified questions for rev

PER CURIAM. Appellants, Gifford A. Pirnie and Lillie J. Pirnie, defaulted in payment of several notes, evidencing loans advanced through the Farmer’s Home Administration and the United States as the owner and holder of the notes instituted this suit and obtained a judgment against the Pirnies for the balance due on the loans.

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge. laThis appeal stems from a suit on a promissory note arising out of a loan transaction between appellant, Lilly Lyd, L.L.C., and appellee, Cora Joyce Graham. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Appellee, Cora Joyce Graham, and her husband, Robert Mullins, who was deceased at the time of t

797 F.Supp.2d 1163 (2011) Regina DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-2304-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 24, 2011. *1169 Dennis E. Egan, The Popham Law Firm, P.C., Kansas City, MO, Fredrick D. Deay, II, Overland Park, KS, for Plaintiff. Jennifer L. Arendes, Narcisa

LILLIE, J. This is an appeal from an order settling the final account of the executor of the estate of Osa Bell Zavadil, deceased, ordering distribution to the sole legatee named in her will and dismissing objections thereto. Osa Bell Zavadil died testate on October 23, 1959, seven months after her husband, Louis George Zavadil, who likewise died testate. Her will was admitted to probate on December 8, 1959, lette

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant S.F., as parent and natural guardian of S.E.F., an infant,1 appeals from the judgment of the district court entered April 22, 2014 dismissing S.F.’s amended complaint against defendants-appellees, manufacturers of high fructose corn syrup (the “defendants”). S.F. alleges that S.E.F.’s consumption of high fructose corn syrup was a substantial factor in causing S.E.F.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-1228 SANCHEZ & DANIELS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOHN KORESKO AND KORESKO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendants-Appellants, v. CLINTON KRISLOV, ET AL., Third-Party Defendan

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of December 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."