Cases

Memorandum and Order L. FELIPE RESTREPO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff in this case, Alberto J. Lopez was hired by Defendants, Tri-State Drywall, Inc. and Dean Ganoudis (collectively, “Tri-State”), as a “framer” to install, tape, hang and finish drywall at a veteran’s residence facility. In his First Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) (“Complaint”), he alleges that h

977 A.2d 228 (2009) 116 Conn.App. 483 SOVEREIGN BANK v. James LICATA et al. No. 28286. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 15, 2009. Decided August 18, 2009. *233 Kenneth A. Votre, New Haven, for the appellant (substitute plaintiff Seven Oaks Partners, LP). FLYNN, C.J., a

Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in Parts I and II.B.3 of the opinion of the Court (Associational Discrimination) and I therefore concur in the result. Mr. Zarda does have a sex discrimination claim under Title VII based on the allegation that he was fired because he was a man who had an intimate relationship with another man. I write separately because, of the several justifications advanced in that opinion

*394 OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge. Plaintiff Reed Construction Data, Inc. (“Reed”) brought this action against Defendants McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., (“McGraw-Hill”), five unidentified natural persons, and five unidentified entities,1 claiming violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(

RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. These consolidated cases, Drill Masters Eldorado Tool Inc., et al. v. PCC Specialty Products Inc., (“Drill Masters v. PCC”), and PCC Specialty Products, Inc. v. Thomas J. Hall, et al., (“PCC v. Hall”) arise out of the purchase of certain business assets pursuant to an asset purchase agreement and en

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

[Cite as Chernett Wasserman Yarger, L.L.C. v. ComScape Holding, Inc., 2014-Ohio-4214.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100907 CHERNETT WASSERMAN YARGER, L.L.C., ET AL.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Fired at the end of her probationary period with the United States Postal Service (USPS), Mary Gonda, a white female in her fifties, alleges that USPS discriminated against her on the basis of race, sex and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a e

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

Chief Justice RABNER delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a case of statutory interpretation. The question presented is whether a court can find “abuse” or “neglect” of a child under Title 9 if an expectant mother uses drugs during pregnancy but there is no evidence of actual harm when the baby is born. To determine the answer, we do not start with a clean slate. Instead, we interpret a comprehensive legisl

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 7, 2017 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

338 S.C. 9 (1999) 524 S.E.2d 630 James E. PENNELL, Guardian ad Litem for James E. Pennell, II, Francis T. Owens, Guardian ad Litem for Sunny Leighann Owens, Augusta J. Sitton, Jr., Guardian ad Litem for John Joseph Sitton, and John M. Ross for James Tyler Ross, Respondents, v. Katherine Cole FOSTER, Leasing Associates, Inc., Southern National Bank of North Carolina (Now BB & T), Southern National Leasing Corporation (W

87 F.Supp.2d 771 (2000) Phillip VAN HULL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The MARRIOTT COURTYARD, et al., Defendants. No. 399CV7113. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 18, 2000. *772 *773 Brian P. Barger, Brady, Coyle & Schmidt, Toledo, OH, Jack J. Brady, Brady, Coyl

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50273 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:07-cr-00497- CAS-1 MARK TYRELL FOWLKES, AKA Mark Fowlkes, AKA Marq Tyrell Fowlkes, AKA Shawn Walls, OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) NATIONAL TREASURY ) EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 25-0381 (AB

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on seven motions to dismiss.2 Plaintiffs, Arthur and Carmelita Bellocchio, are proceeding pro se and bring this action against various federal, state, and local entities for damages arising primarily from noise and air pollution associated with the New Jersey Turnpike and the

COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS LUIS MUNOZ, )

The opinion of the Court was delivered by VERNIERO, J. This is a declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff insurer seeks a declaration that the homeowner’s policy purchased by the insured does not provide liability coverage for certain conduct of the insured’s son, also an insured person under the policy. Specifically, the son stabbed a third party during an altercation on the insured premises, and the victim