Cases

TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Lexington Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, subscribing to policy B0801 15304U15, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd., Zurich American Insurance Company, Chubb Insurance Company, Chubb Custom, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, Continental Casualty Company, and Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. ("Brookdale" and collectively

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LEXINGTON INSURANCE CO., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:19-cv-3131 (GMH) ) PADDOCK SWIMMING POOL CO.,

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-22-00174-CV ________________ LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION AND EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Appellees __

257 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 2001) EOTT ENERGY OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,v.WINTERTHUR SWISS INSURANCE COMPANY; COMPAGNIE EUROPEENE D'ASSURANCES INDUSTRIELLES S.A.; ST. KATHERINE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED; YASUDA FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, (UK) LIMITED; LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY; CNA REINSURANCE OF LONDON, LIMITED; IMPERIO CAMPANHIA DE SEGUROS; THE DOMINION INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED; FOLKSAM INTERNATIONAL INSU

1 A.3d 1016 (2010) 2010 VT 44 VERMONT MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PARSONS HILL PARTNERSHIP, Willard Group, Poulin Group and Adrienne Fortin. No. 08-509. Supreme Court of Vermont. June 4, 2010. *1017 Leo A. Bisson and Joslyn L. Wilschek of Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer PC, Montpelier, for Plaintiff-A

Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice MINTON. The ministerial exception, rooted in the First Amendment’s principles of religious freedom, is a well-settled doctrine applicable to employment disputes between religious institutions and employees serving in a ministerial capacity. Recently, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. E.E.O.C.,1 <

FISHER, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW We are presented with the question of whether there is subject matter jurisdiction in this case. Eleven years ago, Appel-lee EOTT Energy, then known as Enron, filed this action in Montana state court. Appellant Icarom, then the Insurance Cor*995poration of Ireland (“ICI”), removed this action to federal court on t

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ___________________ Nos. 96-1556 96-1557 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as RECEIVER FOR THE BANK FOR SAVINGS,

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This appeal, from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of an insured against its excess carrier, raises several questions of Pennsylvania insurance law. The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, the corporate owner of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (“HUP”), and the plaintiffs in the district court, won a $4.8 million judgment in co

815 F.2d 890 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1072 The TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee,v.LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,v.AFFILIATED RISK CONTROL ADMINISTRATORS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.and Insurance Company of North America, Aetna InsuranceCompany, Cigna Companies and Johnson & Higgins ofPennsylvania, Inc. and Alexander & Alexander, Inc. and DuaneMorris & Hecks

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0091p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ SCHOENING INVESTMENT LP, │ Plaintif

OPINION Tracy Christopher, Justice In this insurance-coverage dispute, apartment-complex owner and former mortgagee Westview Drive Investments, LLC appeals from the take-nothing judgment rendered after a jury trial on its claims against King-Phillips Insurance Agency, Inc. for negligent misrepresentation, promissory estoppel, fraud, violations of the Decept

623 A.2d 1099 (1991) HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION and Celanese Engineering Resins, Inc., corporations of the State of Delaware, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. CENTAUR INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Superior Court of D

757 N.W.2d 584 (2008) 2008 SD 106 AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Sandra Pike, Christopher Pike and Ashley Deiss, Defendants and Appellees. No. 24723. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued May 20, 2008. Decided November 5, 2008.

854 F.Supp. 64 (1994) In re COLONIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LITIGATION. PASTERNAK v. COLONIAL EQUITIES CORP. Applies in the Following Related Actions: Matthew PASTERNAK v. COLONIAL REALTY/USA CORP. Nicholas R. SALERNO v. Kenneth SCHWARTZ. Karen KOMAR v. CITYTRUST. Susan SEEMAN v. The TRAVELLERS INSURANCE CO. Daniel McNAUGHTON v. CITYTRUST. Jean NEAL v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN &a;

735 F.Supp.2d 1099 (2010) WARREN E. JOHNSON COMPANIES, d/b/a Johnson Commercial Agents, Plaintiff, v. UNIFIED BRAND, INC., f/k/a DI Foodservice Companies, Defendant. Civ. No. 10-196 (MJD/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 4, 2010. *1101 J. Mark Dady, John D. Holland, Dady & Gardner, PA, Minneapolis, MN,

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. The above referenced cause alleges breach of contract, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, and violations of §§ 541.006(a) (unfair settlement practices) and 542.051 et seq. (prompt payment of claims) of the Texas Insurance Code and of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) §§ 17.41 et seq. (engaging in “false, misleadi

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES R. SIMPSON III, District Judge. This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment between the plaintiff, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (“Philadelphia Indemnity”) and defendant Youth Alive, Inc. (‘Youth Alive”), (DNs 60, 62).1 The facts in this case are undisputed. This action arose out of

758 F.Supp.2d 871 (2010) LOL FINANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PAUL JOHNSON & SONS CATTLE CO., INC., First National Bank of Omaha, Robert P. Johnson, Keri J. Maloley, John Doe and ABC Company, Defendants. Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Maverick Feeders, Inc., Shon Sawyer and Julie Sawyer, Third-Party Defendants. No. 4:09CV3224. United States District Co

*1250MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ROBERT J. SHELBY, United States District Judge This is a dispute between insurance companies. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services (AEGIS) seeks reimbursement from National Union Fire Insurance Company for settlement payments arising out of three underlying lawsuits. The parties have filed cross-motio