Cases

Memorandum Decision VOROS, Judge: T 1 Appellant Michael W. Lucas purchased a home in September 2007, shortly before the United States real estate market collapsed. He alleged in his complaint that he lost his job, that his home suffered damage as a result of having been built on expansive soil, and that federal programs designed to assist him instead a

PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks review of a final summary judgment of foreclosure. He argues that summary judgment was improperly entered because there was a disputed issue of material fact regarding the lender’s compliance with the notice requirements for accelerating the mortgage. Appellee concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the judgment on appeal for further proceedings. Appellant’s motion f

394 B.R. 469 (2008) Lysbeth A. CASE, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant. Shanedra E. Johnson, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Bank National Association, Defendant. John F. Herrera, Plaintiff, v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, Defendant. Jerome D. Oven and Ann E. Oven, Plaintiffs, v. Universal Savings Bank, FA, Defendant. Oliver L. Newsom and Claudia M. Newsom, Plaintiffs, v. Bank of America Corporation, Def

298 S.W.3d 53 (2009) Unice HARRIS, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Respondent. No. WD 69634. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. August 25, 2009. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 27, 2009. Application for Transfer Denied December 22, 2009. Unice Harris, Lee's Summit, MO, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Vesko Borislavov Ananiev, who is proceeding pro se, has brought two claims against eight named and ten unidentified “Doe” defendants allegedly in *127 volved in the foreclosure of

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Dennis Obduskey appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendants-Appellees Wells Fargo and McCarthy and Holthus, LLP’s motions to dismiss numerous claims, including whether either party, was liable as a “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p. Obduskey

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Patel (2019 NY Slip Op 06532) Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Patel 2019 NY Slip Op 06532 Decided on September 11, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

DISMISS; Opinion issued April 3, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01268-CV SYLVIA JACKSON, Appellant V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Edwards (2024 NY Slip Op 05368) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Edwards 2024 NY Slip Op 05368 Decided on October 30, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

Filed 2/9/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN KUMCHAI KIM MIYAHARA, B317726 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV44166) v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court

284 B.R. 322 (2002) In re Cathy A. SINGLETON, debtor. Cathy A. Singleton, plaintiff/appellee v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., defendant/appellant. No. 02-CV-137. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 3, 2002. *323 Edward J. Bertozzi, Jr., Patricia A. Sullivan, Edwards & Angell, Peter N. Wasylyk, Providence, RI, Ro

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2026-0776 _____________________________ GLEN SCHOOLEY, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007- FXD2, et al., Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County. Christopher Patterson, Judge.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: _______________ 3 Filing Date: June 9, 2015 4 NO. 33,669 5 CHRISTOPHER J. DOLLENS, individually 6 and as Personal Representative of the Estate 7 of James E. Dollens, Deceased, and SANDRA 8 EVANS, 9 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 10 v. 11 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Successor by 12 merger to WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, 13 INC., 14 Defendants-Appellants, 15 and 16 THE DUHIGG LAW FIRM and 17 STEW

112 Cal.Rptr.2d 284 (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 819 Ernest M. THAYER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant and Appellant. No. A090429. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two. October 2, 2001. As Modified October 25, 2001. *285 Brobeck, Phleger & Harr

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Stefan R. Underhill, United States District Judge This case arises out of a mortgage refinancing agreement between Allyson Smith and Wells Fargo, N.A. Smith seeks to enforce her right to rescission under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq., and receive damages for Wells Fargo’s failure to honor her request for rescission. Smith also

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Terry Walter Conant (“Conant” or “Plaintiff”) brings this action pro se challenging the foreclosure of his property. Presently before the Court are motions by several Defendants for dismissal of this lawsuit. Also before the Court are several motions by Plai

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGG COSTA, District Judge. The real estate at issue in this proposed class action is part of an 800-acre development along the mid-Gulf Coast of Texas. But the allegations of fraud reach back to decisions made in Washington and Wall Street during the height of the financial crisis in the fall of 2008. In the spasm of bank merger activity that occurred during that period, whe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMOS L. MAZZANT, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants Weds Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Weds Fargo”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s (“FHLMC”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 22). The Court, having considered the relevant pleadings, finds that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted. BACKGROUND

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS EXCESSIVE INSURANCE CLAIMS JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Clifford McKenzie, Daniel and Robin Biddix (“the Biddixes”), David Kibiloski (“Kibiloski”), and Virginia Ryan (“Ryan”) (“Plaintiffs”) against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“WFBNA”), which at times does business as W

DISMISS; Opinion issued April 29, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01326-CV GABRIEL AGUINAGA, SAN JUANA GONZALEZ-AGUINAGA, AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 233 LOS CABOS DRIVE, DALLAS, TEXAS 75232, Appellants V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Appellee