⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lewis v. Title Max”

District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006-05-04 · Published · cited 3× · 431 F. Supp. 2d 1185; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31922; 2006 WL 1321420
431 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2006) Aaron SAXTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TITLE MAX OF ALABAMA, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 2:04 CV 2579 RDP. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 4, 2006. James R. Mulroy, II, Lewis Fisher Henderson Claxton & Mulroy, LLP, for The defendant's counsel. Kirby D. Farris, Farris Riley & Pitt LLP, Birmin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 16-17468 Date Filed: 12/11/2017 Page: 1 of 48 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-17467 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cv-00172-CDL, Bkcy No. 4:15-bkc-40877-JTL In re: JONATHAN NO
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-12-11 · Published · cited 37× · 876 F.3d 1302
NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to assess the interplay between the United States Bankruptcy Code and a Georgia statute that defines state-law property rights. For its part, the Code' describes a bankruptcy ¿state as including “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case,” 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1), and goes on to provide, as relevant here, th
Dimeo v. Maxpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006-05-26 · Published · cited 11× · 433 F. Supp. 2d 523; 34 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1921; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34456; 2006 WL 1490098
433 F.Supp.2d 523 (2006) Anthony DIMEO, III v. Tucker MAX No. Civ.A. 06-1544. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 26, 2006. *524 Matthew B. Weisberg, Prochniak Poet & Weisberg P.C., Morton, PA, for Anthony Dimeo, III. Michael K. Twersky, Montgomery McCracken Walker and Rhoads LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000-05-02 · Published · cited 62× · 5 P.3d 249; 197 Ariz. 535; 5 P.2d 249; 320 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 51; 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 67
5 P.3d 249 (2000) 197 Ariz. 535 L. Kenneth BAKER, on Behalf of HALL BRAKE SUPPLY, INC., Employee Profit Sharing Plan; Richard Bertocchi as Trustee of Regal Lighting Fixture Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan; Susan W. Boyes and William J. Boyes, wife and husband; Profit Sharing Plan of Carmen H. Brooks, M.D., P.C.; James E. Campbell a Trustee of James E. Campbell, M.D., P.C. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust; A. Leroy Ellison as Trustee of
In Re Max GWpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006-07-11 · Published · cited 24× · 2006 WI 93; 716 N.W.2d 845
716 N.W.2d 845 (2006) 2006 WI 93 In re the TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO MAX G.W., a Person Under the Age of 18. Kenosha County Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Jodie W., Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner. No. 2005AP2-NM. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued March 21, 2006. Decided July 11, 2006.
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2013-02-01 · Published · cited 7× · 2013 WY 14; 294 P.3d 895; 2013 Wyo. LEXIS 17; 2013 WL 394714
KITE, Chief Justice. [11] Max Maxfield, the Secretary of State for the State of Wyoming, filed a declaratory judgment action in district court challenging the constitutionality of Wyoming's term limit statute. The State responded, asserting among other claims, that Mr. Maxfield's complaint does not present a justiciable controversy and, in any event, the statute is constitutiona
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-03-21 · Published · cited 820× · 918 F.3d 1213
NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: Faced with a defendant's motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff asserting an intentional-discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Protection Clause, or 42 U.S.C. § 1981 must make a sufficient
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2003-03-20 · Published · cited 24× · 840 So. 2d 709; 2003 WL 1343375
840 So.2d 709 (2003) RE/MAX REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, INC., Re-Max Real Estate Partners, and Judith H. Corts v. Pamela LINDSLEY. No. 2001-IA-00639-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. March 20, 2003. *710 Kristen A. Horton, Ridgeland, G. Todd Burwell, Jackson, for appellants. Jack W. Land, Michael K. Randolph, Joe D. Stevens, Ha
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015-01-07 · Published · cited 10× · 79 F. Supp. 3d 394; 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1872; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1642; 2015 WL 106057
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. This is an action by Plaintiff Jane Lewis alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., by her employer, Defendant Boeh-ringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BI”). Ms. Lewis filed her
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 15-11362 Date Filed: 03/21/2019 Page: 1 of 100 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11362 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-04038-RWS JACQUELINE LEWIS,
In Re Lewispublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006-07-24 · Published · cited 21× · 346 B.R. 89; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1388; 2006 WL 2051375
346 B.R. 89 (2006) In re Shekima LEWIS, Debtor. In re James Nesmith, Debtor. Nos. 04-36778ELF, 04-34214ELF. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 24, 2006. *90 *91 *92 Eric J. Clayman, Jenkins and Clayman, Audubon, NJ, for Debtor.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 466 B.R. 831; 67 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1502; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 2411
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING TURNOVER OF PROPERTY OR ALTERNATIVELY FOR CONTEMPT AND DENYING MOTION OF QUICKCASH TO ALLOW SALE OF COLLATERAL KATHARINE M. SAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came on for hearing on November 17, 2011, (the “Hearing”) on the Motion for Order Requiring Turnover of Property or Alternatively for Contempt (the “Complaint”)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007-01-22 · Published · cited 113× · 476 F.3d 369; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1388; 2007 WL 137278
PRADO, Circuit Judge: Following a three-week trial, a jury convicted Donnie Thompson (“Thompson”), Michael Norris Martin (“Martin”), Buddy Ford (“Ford”), Leonard Duane Griffith (“Griffith”), Jerry Wayne Beason (“Bea-son”), and Shane Samson of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute over fifty grams of methamphetamine or 500 grams of a substance or mixture containing methampheta
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 350 P.3d 163; 2015 OK CIV APP 49; 2014 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 117
BAY MITCHELL, Judge. 1 1 This case arises out of a title insurance coverage dispute between Plaintiff/Appellant OPY I, LL.C. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant/Appellee First American Title Insurance Company, Inc. ("Defendant"). Plaintiff, an Oklahoma limited liability company, appeals from summary judgment granted in Defendant's favor. | 12 On August 28, 2008
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2001-IA-00639-SCT RE/MAX REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, INC., RE-MAX REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, AND JUDITH H. CORTS v. PAMELA LINDSLEY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 3/19/2001 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHNNY LEE WILLIAMS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAMAR COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS:
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 350 P.3d 163
OSCN Found Document:OPY I, L.L.C. v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002-07-26 · Published · cited 0× · 46 F. App'x 900
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff appeals from
Lewis v. Grinkerpublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2000-01-19 · Published · cited 2× · 111 F. Supp. 2d 142; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18092; 2000 WL 1239907
111 F.Supp.2d 142 (2000) Lydia LEWIS, etc., et alia, Plaintiffs, v. William GRINKER, etc., et alia, Defendants. No. CV-79-1740-CPS. United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 19, 2000. *143 *144 Richard Elliot Blum, Scott A. Rosenberg, The Legal Aid Society Civil Appeal & Law Ref
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004-05-19 · Published · cited 1× · 876 So. 2d 142; 2004 La.App. 4 Cir. 0507; 2004 La. App. LEXIS 1529
876 So.2d 142 (2004) Darryl N. LEWIS v. MARSHALL BROS. LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., et al. No. 2004-C-0507. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 19, 2004. *143 Matthew K. Brown, Sullivan, Stolier & Resor, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Relator. (Court composed of Judge CHARLES R. JONES, Judge MAX N. TOBIAS, Jr.,