Cases

*984OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: Plaintiff Donald Lewis brings this suit against Defendants Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation and certain of its executives and members of its Board of Directors. He alleges that he was subject to discrimination on the basis of his race and gender, and that his employmen

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) OVERRULING IN PART AND SUSTAINING IN PART PARTIES’ OBJECTIONS David Alan Ezra, Senior United States Distict Judge On November 3, 2016, the Court held a hearing on (1) Defendants Air Liquide America Specialty Gases, L.L.C. (“Air Liq-uide”), Arizona Public Service Company (“AZ Public Service”), ChemResearch Co., Inc. (“ChemResearch”), City of Phoe

688 F.Supp.2d 1315 (2010) Charles CORLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LONG-LEWIS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:09-cv-01812-HGD. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. January 28, 2010. *1316 G. Patterson Keahey, Jr., Tracey C. Dotson, Law Offices of G. Patterson Keahey PC, James Arthur Butts, John D. Sa

138 F.Supp.2d 466 (2001) Michael P. LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. Eric D. ROSENFELD, Robert Bernstein, Robert B. Tannenhauser, and Rosenfeld, Bernstein & Tannenhauser, L.L.P., Defendants. No. 00 CIV. 5368(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 8, 2001. *467 *468 Michael Schneider,

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

Munder, J. This is a summary proceeding by a landlord to recover possession of real property. The trial court awarded judgment to the landlord and the Appellate Term affirmed. The tenant had occupied three hangars on Old Country Road, in the former Roosevelt Field, near Mineóla, under a 25-year lease which restricted use of the premises £ £ solely for a general services motion picture studio ”. By another provi

675 F.2d 1085 18 ERC 1471, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,674 Constance A. ADLER, Roosevelt Lathan and Pearline Lathan,etc., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,v.Andrew LEWIS,* Secretary of Transportation,Defendants/Appellees. No. 79-4645. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Consul, Ltd. and Kenneth B. Wilson appeal from orders dismissing their complaints for failure to state claims. We reverse. BACKGROUND Consul is a North Carolina corporation of which Wilson is president. Wilson is licensed as a real estate broker in North

666 F.Supp. 370 (1987) LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Mario M. CUOMO, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Paul L. Gioia, in his official capacity as Chairman of the New York Public Service Commission, Harold A. Jerry, Jr., Anne F. Mead, Gail Garfield Schwartz and John Doe, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York Public Service Commission, the Long Island Power Authority, and William L.

OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph Goldstein, J. Plaintiff, in this breach of contract action, sues for a refund which he claims is due him as a result of defective service, as well as, price and refund discrimination. Plaintiff urges that the Long Island Railroad (LIRR) has failed to perform certain services which plaintiff alleges are part of defendant’s contractual obligation. While the money sought by plai

Howard T. Hogast, J. These consolidated proceedings are brought under article 13 of the Tax Law to review the assessments upon certain real property situated in the County of Nassau for the tax years beginning May 1, 1957, May 1, 1958 and May 1,1959. The 9 tax lots involved are numbered 1243 to 1251 inclusive, and lie in section 11, block D, on the tax map of Nassau County. For the purposes of this proceeding, it was stipulated t

306 F.Supp. 1106 (1969) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. F M C CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 37123. United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania. August 22, 1969. *1107 *1108 Donald G. Balthis, John W. Neville, Jon D. Hartman, L. Barry Costilo, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Antitru

150 F.3d 1011 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8001 Stuart HANLON, Plaintiff,andKenneth Edwards; Nancy Edwards; Kathy Hancock; MichaelHancock; Lori Tuttle; Paul Alan Levy; NancyHuvendick; Center For Auto Safety,Intervenors-Appellants,v.CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.Stuart HANLON, Plaintiff,andRobert Kempton, Plaintiff-Appellant,andGeorge Va

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. This case raises the question of whether a 1907-08 addition to the Navajo Reservation of nearly 1.9 million acres in northwestern New Mexico was terminated by two Executive Orders issued in 1908 and 1911. * The plain tiff-appellant is the Pitts-burg and Midway Coal Mining Company (“

FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST CROIX HESS OIL VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION ) CASE NO SX 05 CV 165 ) Plaintiff ) COMPLEX LITIGATION DIVISION ) V )

HOPKINS, District Judge. The suit is one in equity testing legality of a contract whereby defendant railway undertook collection of dues owing to a company union by employees of defendant who were members of the company union. The contract provides for collection of the dues by means of pay roll deductions. The plan was first put in use in 1925 and the contract here involved was made effective in January, 1933. Legality of t

993 F.2d 1387 61 USLW 2684, 125 Lab.Cas. P 35,819,1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 601 Felton HALE and Richard S. Berry, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATE OF ARIZONA; ARCOR Enterprises, a subdivision of thestate; James Ricketts, former director of the ArizonaDepartment of Corrections (DOC); Samuel Lewis, director ofthe DOC; Marilyn Wilkens, director of Arizona CorrectionalIndustries; Thomas L

570 F.2d 467 97 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2836, 83 Lab.Cas. P 10,356 REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant in No. 77-1350,v.UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, United Mine Workers ofAmerica, District No. 5, United Mine Workers of America,Local No. 9873, United Mine Workers of America, Local No.688, Gerald Abbott, Theodore Spazok, Peter Trbovich, NickPaskovich, and Robert Famularo.REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION

ORDER OF DISMISSAL These consolidated actions challenging the validity of the “Clean Water Rule,” 80 Fed. Reg. 37,054 (June 29, 2015), having been transferred to this court by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation; and This court having issued its jurisdictional ruling on February 22, 2016, holding that plaintiffs’ challenges are subject to direct review in this court,

MEMORANDUM DECISION BRICCETTI, District Judge. Plaintiff Jason Hettler, a former security lieutenant and alarm station operator at the Indian Point nuclear power plant (“Indian Point”), brings this action against the corporate entities that operate Indian Point and several Indian Point employees. Plaintiff alleges defendants interfered with his rights under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U