Cases

Justice Boyd announced the Court's judgment and delivered the Court's opinion as to Parts I, II, and III.A, in which Chief Justice Hecht, Justice Green, Justice Guzman, Justice Lehrmann, Justice Devine, and Justice Brown joined, a plurality opinion as to Parts III.B and III.C, in which Chief Justice Hecht, Justice Lehrmann, and Justice Devine joined, and an opinion as to Parts III.D, III.E, III.F, and III.G, in which Justice Lehrma

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 14-0721 ══════════ USAA TEXAS LLOYDS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. GAIL MENCHACA, RESPONDENT ════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00022-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2025 10:33 PM No. 15-25-00022-CV CHRIST

94 F.3d 65 PRESIDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,TLC Beatrice International Holdings, Inc., Movant-Appellant,v.Michael R. MILKEN; Roy Abbott; Paul Abecassis; JackAckerman; Peter Ackerman; Joseph P. Adams; StevenAndreder; Joel Asen; Andrew Astrachan; Mark Attanasio;Eileen Austen; Herbert Bachelor; Stanley Bailowitz;Jeffrey Balash; Donald Balser; Dan Bathon; Jeffrey P.Beck; Joseph Benci

07-17-00458CV ACCEPTED SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 3/23/2018 4:00 PM Vivian Long, Clerk APPELLATE NO. 07-17-00458-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTAMARILLO, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ___________________________________ ) HEALTH REPUBLIC INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 16-cv-259C ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Filed: August 19, 2022

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' Before the Court are Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife), OBRE, Inc., f/k/a CB Richard Ellis, Inc. (CBRE), and MCPP 2100 McKinney, LLC’s (MCPP) Motions for Summary Judgment. Docs. 194,195, and-196. For the reasons explained below, MetLife’s and MCPP’s motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and CBRE’s m

ACCEPTED 15-24-00075-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/21/2025 4:02 PM NO. 15-24-00075-CV CHRISTO

04/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 2, 2020 Session METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY v. LAYTON JONES Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 19C462 Kelvin D. Jones, Judge _______

OPINION SCOTT K. FIELD, Justice. Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC sued for judicial review of a final order issued by the Public Utility Commission denying the recovery of certain rate-case expenses under the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA). 1 See Tex. UtihCo

ACCEPTED 03-14-00737-CV 4701431 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

The trial court entered a judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither the parents nor T were patients of defendants and, therefore, the court reasoned, defendants owed no obligation of professional care toward them. The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment as to the parents but affirmed as to T. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, and we reverse in part and affirm in par

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 5109682 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00286-CV ___________________________ BENBROOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant V. THE NATIONAL BANK OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 67th District Court Tarrant County, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge: Table of Contents I. Background.............................................................138 II. Principles of Section 5 Analysis...........................................139 A.Retrogression.......................................................139 1. Texas’s Burden of Proof.......

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00007-CV NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellant V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 126th District Court Travis County, Texas Trial Court No. D-1-GN-17-004072 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.