Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERRY I. ADELMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This cause is on appeal from an adverse ruling of the Social Security Administration. The suit involves Applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act and for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Act. Claimant has filed a Brief in S

MEMORANDUM OPINION T. MICHAEL PUTNAM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The plaintiff, Edwin Omar Perez, himself a former employee of the Social Security Administration, appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying his application for a period of *1203disability and Disability Insuran

Opinion and Order William K. Sessions, III District Court Judge Plaintiff Andrew Reynard appeals the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denying his September 27, 2011 applications for Title II social security disability insurance benefits and Title XVI supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. Mr. Reynard alleges that he became unable to work on June 9, 2011. Administrative Record (hereafter “A

DECISION AND ORDER THERESE WILEY DANCES, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Duane Stephens brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. (Administrative Transcript at 13,1) This cas

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. Introduction Represented by counsel, Plaintiff Terra M. Barrett (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying *569

OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Michael J. Cooper appeals from the denial of his application for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits and *665Supplemental Security Income- Disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423 1381a, and 1382c. This appeal is broug

DECISION AND ORDER HON. MICHAEL A. TELESCA, United States District Judge I. Introduction Represented by counsel, Diane B. Nasca (“plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to *293Titles II and XVI of the Social Security-Act (“the Act”), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”

OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Mrs. Melody F. Anderson, seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) finding that Plaintiff had medically improved as of January 1, 2012, resulting in the termination of Plaintiffs Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). For the following reasons, the Commi

ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge Now before the Court is plaintiffs appeal following the denial of disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) by the administrative law judge (“ALJ”). Docket No. 28. The Commissioner of Social Security has filed a cross-motion to affirm the denial of DIB. Docket No. 25. For the reasons stated be

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Plaintiff Galena Kaye Duarte Lopez seeks review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security which denied her disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under sections 216(i), 223(d), and 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act. Because the ALJ’s decision contains reversible error and there

DECISION AND ORDER Sharon L. Gleason, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Michael Scott Gurnett filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“disability insurance”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“the *1188Act”) respectively,1 alleging disability begi

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Plaintiff Joshua L. Hart seeks review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied him disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act. Because the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) is not supported .by subs

ORDER AND OPINION KIMBERLY C. PRIEST JOHNSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On February 17, 2016, Plaintiff Mark David Jackson initiated this civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the “Act”), Section 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the case was referred to the undersigned

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT Danny C. Reeves, United States District Judge These matters are pending for consideration of Defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s, motions to dismiss in part. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Notices entered in each case, the motions to dismiss in part were converted to motions for summary

ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RICARDO S, MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Ms. Wills seeks review of the denial of her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”).1 In determining whether a claimant is disabled the Commissioner must follow a five-step sequential evaluation process. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. CASSADY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff brings this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying him claims for period’ of disability and disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S

JOHN T. CURTIN, District Judge. This matter has been transferred to the undersigned for all further proceedings, by order of Chief United States District Judge William M. Skretny dated October 2, 2014 (Item 17). Plaintiff Helen Silvers initiated this action on October 7, 2013, pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“the Act”), for judicial review of the final determination of the Commissio

ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW WILLIAM T. LAWRENCE, District Judge. Plaintiff Tyler Keener requests judicial review of the final decision of the Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”), discontinuing the Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSI”) he received as a child. The Court, having reviewed the record and the briefs of t

ORDER BRIDGET S. BADE, United States Magistrate Judge. Justin Perkins (Plaintiff) seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner) denying his application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act (the Act). The parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and have filed b

ORDER John E. Jones III, United States District Judge AND NOW, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn (Doc. 18), recommending that the Commissioner’s final decision denying Timothy Mc.Gleary’s application for benefits be affirmed and the appeal be denied, and, after an independent review of the record, and noting that the Plaintiff filed object