Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lewis v. City of Woodbury”
Matthew Lewis Hunter v. City of Des Moines, Iowapublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0735 Filed October 1, 2025 MATTHEW LEWIS HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Defendant-Appellant, ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott, Judge. An employer appeals the denial of its motions for new trial and judgment notwithstandi
Bazakos v. Lewispublic domain
*633OPINION OF THE COURT Smith, J. We hold that a claim against a doctor for his alleged negligence in performing an independent medical examination (IME) is a claim for malpractice, governed by CPLR 214-a’s two-year-and-six-month statute of limitations. I Lewis Bazakos, plaintiff in this case, was also the plaint
Bazakos v. Lewispublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Garni, J. The issue presented for our consideration is as follows: When a physician conducts a medical examination in the context of a personal injury action on behalf of an alleged tortfeasor or his or her insurer and, in the course of doing so, affirmatively injures the examinee, should the examinee’s cause of action against the examining physician to recover damages for that injury be
Lewis v. Lester's of N.Y., Inc.public domain
Lewis v Lester's of N.Y., Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 03109) Lewis v Lester's of N.Y., Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 03109 Decided on May 11, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Rattray v. Woodbury County, Iowapublic domain
761 F.Supp.2d 836 (2010) Maureen RATTRAY, Lisa Lambert, and Lori Mathes, Plaintiffs, v. WOODBURY COUNTY, IOWA, Glenn J. Parrett, individually and as Sheriff of Woodbury County, and Robert E. Aspleaf, individually and as Assistant Chief/Deputy Sheriff of Woodbury County, Defendants. Nos. C07-4014-MWB, C08-4008-MWB, C07-4032-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division.
Barefoot v. City of Wilmingtonpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge LUTTIG joined. OPINION GREGORY, Circuit Judge. The Appellants challenge the City of Wilmington’s decision to annex territory on which they reside. They assert that the annexation violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amend
Olivera v. Town of Woodbury, New Yorkpublic domain
281 F.Supp.2d 674 (2003) Jose OLIVERA, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF WOODBURY, New York, Lt. Richard Shore of the Town of Woodbury Police Department, and "JOHN DOE 1-N," Unidentified Officers of the Town of Woodbury Police Department Defendants. No. 02CIV6010CMMDF. United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 2, 2003. *675
Lucas v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Lucas v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 01580) Lucas v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 01580 Decided on March 18, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Leeandy Development Corp. v. Town of Woodburypublic domain
134 F.Supp.2d 537 (2001) LEEANDY DEVELOPMENT CORP. and Philip Wolikow, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF WOODBURY, Gary Thomasberger, Individually and as Building Administrator of the Town of Woodbury, Joan Caruso, Individually and as Supervisor of the Town of Woodbury, Dennis G. Lindsay, Individually and as Town of Woodbury Town Engineer, John Keleman, Harry Dobson, James Galvin, and Frank Palermo, Individually and as Councilmen of the Town of Woodbury, De
Matter of CREDA, LLC v City of Kingston Planning Bd. (2023 NY Slip Op 00355) Matter of CREDA, LLC v City of Kingston Planning Bd. 2023 NY Slip Op 00355 Decided on January 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York S
Gibson v. City of Portlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSEPH GIBSON and RUSSEL No. 24-1663 SCHULTZ, D.C. No. 3:23- Plaintiffs-Appellants, cv-00833-HZ v. OPINION CITY OF PORTLAND; MULTNOMAH COUNTY; MULTNOMAH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; CHRISTOPHER TRAYNOR; ROD UNDERHILL; MIKE SCHMIDT; BRAD KALBAUGH; and SEAN HUGHEY,
Cory Sessler v. City of Davenport, Iowapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3290 ___________________________ Cory Sessler lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. City of Davenport, Iowa; Greg Behning, in his individual capacity acting as a po
Powers v. City of Fergusonpublic domain
*897MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CAROL E. JACKSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for partial dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs have filed a response in opposition and the issues are fully briefed. In August 2014, plaintiffs Michael J..
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-5067-15T3 A-5615-15T3 A-0443-16T3 CHRISTOPHER C. CONA, individually and as a class representative on behalf of APPROVED FOR PUBLICATI
Reuben Garcia v. City of New Hopepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1836 ___________________________ Reuben J. Garcia lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. City of New Hope; Officer Anthony Gust, all in their individual and official cap
Cecelia Webb v. City of Maplewoodpublic domain
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Cecelia Webb and five other motorists have filed a putative class action against the City of Maplewood, Missouri, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , claiming its policy or custom violates their constitutional rights. They assert the City automat
In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
MANSFIELD, Justice. This case requires us to determine the enforceability of a so-called “last-chance agreement” entered into by a civil service employee. After a municipal firefighter pled guilty to domestic abuse assault, the municipality offered to discipline him with a short suspension instead of terminating his employment. However, in exchange, the municipality insisted that the firefighter agree to give the municipality
208 P.3d 429 (2009) LAS VEGAS TAXPAYER ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE; Las Vegas Redevelopment Reform Committee; D. Taylor; Christopher Bohner; and Ken Liu, Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF the CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada; Beverly K. Bridges, In her Official Capacity as City Clerk of the City of Las Vegas; Livework, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company; FC Vegas 20, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; FC Vegas 39, LLC, A New York Limited Liabilit
OPINION OF THE COURT Feuerstein, J. On this appeal we are presented with the issue of whether, upon a proper application, the Supreme Court has the authority to allow a contractor to post an undertaking and receive contract funds withheld pursuant to a Department of Labor (hereinafter the DOL) notice under Labor Law § 220-b (2) (b). We hold that it does. I. In April 1997