⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Levesque v. Coleman”

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-06-25 · Published · cited 3× · 473 B.R. 331
OPINION DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtor appellants Frank and Bonnie Levesque (the “Levesques”) filed motions (collectively, “Motions”) to reopen their chapter 7 1 bankruptcy case and convert it to chapter 11. The bankruptcy court granted their motion to reopen but denied their motion to conve
State v. Levesquepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994-02-01 · Published · cited 0× · 871 S.W.2d 87; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 139; 1994 WL 23896
CRIST, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction of unlawful use of a weapon. We affirm. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the following evidence was adduced at trial: On February 25, 1991, Barbara and Steven Haffer lived at Parque Carondelet Apartments in the City of St. Louis. Defendant and Valerie Johnson lived upstairs from the Haffers. On that date, at approximately 6 p.m., Barbara Haffer
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 19 Mass. L. Rptr. 449
Garsh, E. Susan, J. The defendant, Simeon Coleman (“Coleman”), has been charged, pursuant to indictments handed down by a Bristol County Grand Juiy, with trafficking in cocaine pursuant to G.L.c. 94C, §32E (b)(3), trafficking in cocaine within one thousand feet of a school zone pursuant to G.L.c. 94C, §32J, and conspiracy to traffick in cocaine pursuant to G.L.c. 94C, §40. Now before this court are the defendant’s two motions to
Levesque v. Shoreypublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972-01-28 · Published · cited 29× · 286 A.2d 606; 1972 Me. LEXIS 255
286 A.2d 606 (1972) Delphis LEVESQUE v. Arnold H. SHOREY and/or Employer's Liability Assurance Corp. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. January 28, 1972. Rudolph T. Pelletier, Madawaska, for plaintiff. Mitchell & Ballou, by John W. Ballou, Bangor, for defendant. *607 Before DUFRESNE, C. J., and WEBBER, WEATHERBEE, POMEROY, WERNICK
Rek v. Pettitpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022-09-06 · Published · cited 0× · 214 Conn. App. 854
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Supreme Court of Florida · 2019-04-16 · Published · cited 1× · 268 So. 3d 662
PER CURIAM. Article IV, section 7(a) of the Florida Constitution authorizes the governor to suspend county officers on several enumerated grounds, including "neglect of duty" and "incompetence." On January 11, 2019, in Executive Order 19-13, Governor Ron DeSantis invoked that authority and cited those grounds to suspend Mary Beth Jackson, Superintendent of Schools for Okaloosa County. J
Keller v. Kellerpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016-07-26 · Published · cited 3× · 142 A.3d 1197; 167 Conn. App. 138; 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 295
MIHALAKOS, J. The plaintiff, Beth Keller, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her marriage to the defendant, Richard Keller, and entering related financial orders. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) relied on gross income in making its financial orders, (2) concluded that the plaintiff had engaged in litigation misconduct and bad fait
Vega v. Lantzpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010-03-02 · Published · cited 114× · 596 F.3d 77; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4261; 2010 WL 698384
596 F.3d 77 (2010) Joe Burgos VEGA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theresa LANTZ, Jack Tokarz, Frederick Levesque, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 08-4748-pr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: July 16, 2009. Decided: March 2, 2010. *79 Lynn D. Wittenbrink, Attorney Generals Office, State of Connec
Supreme Court of Florida · 2024-06-06 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-1246 ____________ MONIQUE HAUGHTON WORRELL, Petitioner, vs. RON D. DESANTIS, GOVERNOR, Respondent. June 6, 2024 PER CURIAM. Monique H. Worrell petitions this Court for a writ of quo warranto and a
Supreme Court of Florida · 2023-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-0247 ____________ ANDREW H. WARREN, Petitioner, vs. RON DESANTIS, GOVERNOR, Respondent. June 22, 2023 CANADY, J. On August 4, 2022, Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 22-176 suspe
Texas Business Court · 2025-02-10 · Published · cited 2× · 2025 Tex. Bus. 5
FILED IN BUSINESS COURT OF TEXAS BEVERLY CRUMLEY, CLERK ENTERED 2/10/2025 2025 Tex. Bus. 5 The Business Court of Texas, 1st Division PRIMEXX ENERGY § OPPO
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016-10-11 · Published · cited 27× · 147 A.3d 104; 323 Conn. 303; 2016 Conn. LEXIS 257
ROGERS, C. J. The primary issue that we must resolve in this appeal is whether the trial court should have instructed the jury that the defendant, The Boy Scouts of America Corporation, 1 could not be held responsible for the sexual abuse of the plaintiff, John Doe,
Texas Business Court · 2025-07-16 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 Tex. Bus. 26
FILED IN BUSINESS COURT OF TEXAS BEVERLY CRUMLEY, CLERK ENTERED 2025 Tex. Bus. 26 7/16/2025 The Business Court of Texas, 1st Division PRIMEXX ENERGY § OPPORTUNITY FUND, LP and § PRIMEXX EN
Taylor v. Lantzpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011-06-14 · Published · cited 3× · 20 A.3d 88; 129 Conn. App. 437; 2011 Conn. App. LEXIS 333
20 A.3d 88 (2011) 129 Conn.App. 437 Derrick TAYLOR v. Theresa C. LANTZ et al. No. 32242. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 23, 2011. Decided June 14, 2011. *89 Derrick Taylor, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Lynn D. Wittenbrink, assistant attorney general, with whom we
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-02-02 · Published · cited 6× · 280 F.R.D. 197; 2012 WL 360005; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12883
MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. Presently before the court is Plaintiff, Allied World Assurance Company’s (“Allied World”) motion to enforce a subpoena against Lincoln General Insurance Company (“Lincoln”). (Doc. 2.) The motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition. For the reasons below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I. Backgr
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995-11-06 · Published · cited 11× · 906 F. Supp. 1182; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16549; 1995 WL 664743
906 F.Supp. 1182 (1995) Ada VAN HARKEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 94 C 6502. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 6, 1995. *1183 *1184 Dana Andrew Alden (Walter Maksym & Associates), Oak Brook, IL, for Plaintiff. Charle
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998-04-17 · Published · cited 3× · 716 So. 2d 729; 1998 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 290; 1998 WL 178797
John Morgan ("the father") and Donna Morgan Burt ("the mother") were divorced by the Circuit Court of Lee County in 1979. Pursuant to the divorce judgment, the father was ordered to pay $70 per week in child support for the couple's three children. At some point shortly after the divorce, the father moved to Maryland. On April 7, 1980, the mother filed an URESA action seeking enforcement of the father's child support, obligation. On July 7, 1980, the Circuit Court of Baltimore
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-06-11 · Published · cited 59× · 926 F.3d 761
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 23, 2018 Decided June 11, 2019 No. 16-3066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. MICHAEL D. BIKUNDI, SR., APPELLANT Consolidated with 16-3067 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 25-1698, 25-1755 PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.; PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS; PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; UNITED STATES DEPA
State v. Siverlypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Alaska · 1991-12-27 · Published · cited 0× · 822 P.2d 1389; 1991 Alas. App. LEXIS 103; 1991 WL 275190
OPINION Melissa Siverly was charged with driving while her license was suspended, AS 28.15.291. She asked the district court to suppress the evidence against her, challenging the legality of the traffic stop that led to the charge. Kenai Magistrate Lynn H. Christensen granted Siverly's suppression motion, and the State of Alaska petitioned this court for review. We granted the State's petition, and we now reverse the decision of the