Cases

ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Cequent Performance Products, Inc.’s (“Cequent”) motion to set aside the default entry (ECF No. 42) and its motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 29). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to set aside the default entry and GRANTS, in part, Defendant’s motion to

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and Opinion Filed September 17, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00799-CV JONATHAN CORNWELL AND SHADD MCKINNEY, Appellant V. DIANA SCOTHORN, STEWART SCOTHORN, THE BENEFIT LINK, INC., AND SCOTHORN AERO, INC., Appellee On A

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”) (DE 4), filed May 2, 2012. On May 17, 2012, I held a hearing on the instant Motion. In addition to considering the evidence presented at t

80 F.Supp.2d 963 (1999) AERO INDUSTRIES, INC. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. JOHN DONOVAN ENTERPRISES-FLORIDA, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. No. IP 99-0671 C-M/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. November 22, 1999. *964 *965 John F. Anderson, R

673 F.Supp.2d 475 (2009) MPJ, My Personal Jet, A.V.V., Plaintiff, v. AERO SKY, L.L.C., Defendant. Civil Action No. SA-09-CV-693-XR. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. November 30, 2009. *478 E. Michelle Bohreer, Todd J. Zucker, Bohreer & Zucker LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff.

26 F.Supp.2d 698 (1998) TRANS PACIFIC LEASING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AERO MICRONESIA, INC., Defendant. No. 98 Civ. 7466 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 24, 1998. *699 Brooks R. Burdette, Matthew B. White, Sami B. Groff, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York City, for Plaintiff. David M. Ki

08/19/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 22, 2019 Session B.W. BYRD METAL FABRICATORS, INC. v. ALCOA, INC. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 2-92-16 William T. Ailor, Judge ________________________

James G. Carr, Sr. U.S. District Judge In this suit plaintiff DISC Environmental Services, Inc. (DISC), seeks a declaratory judgment that it is not liable to defendant Usher Oil Company (Usher) for damages caused to Usher following delivery by DISC of three shipments of waste for treatment at Usher's facility in Novi, Michigan. According to Usher, the waste material was contaminated with PCBs

Case: 22-2185 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AMS-OSRAM USA INC., FKA AMS SENSORS USA, INC., FKA TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC. Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., FKA INTERSIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant ________________

185 Ill. App.3d 956 (1989) 541 N.E.2d 1229 AERO TESTING & BALANCING SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION et at., Respondents. No. 1-88-1353. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed June 28, 1989. *957 *958 Seyfart

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 7, 2023 Decided January 12, 2024 No. 22-1310 T-MOBILE USA, INC., PETITIONER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 23-1002 On Pet

867 F.Supp. 1480 (1994) AERO CONSULTING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant. No. 92-1192-WEB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 6, 1994. *1481 Scott J. Gunderson, Kahrs, Nelson, Fanning, Hite & Kellogg, Wichita, KS, for plaintiff. Ronald P. Williams and John C. Nettels, Jr.,

Paul L. Maloney, United States District Judge In Michigan, employment is presumptively "at-will," meaning that it can be terminated at any time by either party-even before the employment has begun. But sometimes, a relationship between an employer and employee has "distinguishing features" that place it outside the scope of normal, at-will employment. Del Kostanko retired in June of 2015 after more than twenty years

5 Cal.3d 431 (1971) 487 P.2d 1211 96 Cal. Rptr. 571 TRESWAY AERO, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; ELIZABETH MATILDA DENT, as Executrix, etc., Real Party in Interest. Docket No. L.A. 29750. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. August 16, 1971. *43

Case: 21-2316 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BLUE GENTIAN, LLC, NATIONAL EXPRESS, INC., TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2316, 2021-2317

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) MARATHON TARGETS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 25-121 ) v. ) Filed: March 13, 2025 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Re-issued: March 24, 2025 ∗

Case: 21-2316 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BLUE GENTIAN, LLC, NATIONAL EXPRESS, INC., TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2316, 2021-2317

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Dynamic Systems Technology, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63037 ) Under Contract No. W15QKN-19-D-0046 ) Task Order No. W15QKN-20-F-0713 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: James M. White, Esq. Marshall & W

Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Court Judge The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated November 21, 2018. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The Court, being duly advised in the premises, upon the Report and Recommendation

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1053 C 1 Filed: July 30, 2021 Re-issued: August 17, 2021 2 ________________________________________ ) BLUE TECH INC., ) ) Plaintiff, )