⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Leslie Jo Keyes”

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00717-CV 3677007 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:35:57 AM
Alves v. Weberpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2025-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/13/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ELAINE ALVES et al., B338413 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23STCP00999) v. SHIRLEY N. WEBER, as Secretary of State, etc., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the
Schaefer v. Tannianpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 902 F. Supp. 746; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19700; 1995 WL 590090
CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi
Montana Supreme Court · 1924-12-29 · Published · cited 18× · 232 P. 531; 72 Mont. 166; 1924 Mont. LEXIS 196
While section 5680, Revised Codes, provides that a minor should restore the consideration received by him, on disaffirming a contract, this does not apply in cases where it is impossible to restore the consideration. (Englebert v. Pritchett (Neb.), 26 L.R.A. 177; Stevenson v. Kaiser, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 515, 29 N Y Supp. 1122; Craig v. Van Bebber, 100 Mo. 584, 13 Am. St. Rep. 906, 18 Am. St. Rep. 569; Ch
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-09-21 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-09-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991-12-30 · Published · cited 26× · 787 F. Supp. 1030; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19151; 1991 WL 286238
787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
New York Surrogate's Court · 1932-08-01 · Published · cited 14× · 145 Misc. 1; 259 N.Y.S. 610; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1279
O’Brien, S. This trial of the issue of the status of a contestant in the pending probate proceeding began on October 19, 1931, and with the exception of a recess of one day in November, and of three and a half days in Christmas week occasioned by the death of decedent’s sister, continued without interruption until Monday, January 11, 1932, at two p. m.; 149 witnesses were called in the trial, 834 exhibits were marked in evidence a