Cases

352 S.W.3d 479 (2011) Betty Yvon LESLEY, et al., Petitioners, v. VETERANS LAND BOARD OF the STATE of Texas, et al., Respondents. No. 09-0306. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued September 15, 2010. Decided August 26, 2011. Rehearing Denied December 16, 2011. *480 Charles L. Tighe, Charles Christopher

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this

MEMORANDUM ** Kathleen Austin appeals the district court’s grants of summary judgment and *672attorneys’ fees in favor of appellee CCC Information Services, an employee benefits plan (“the Plan”), in Austin’s action for disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (ERISA). We have jurisdic

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, K.J. BRUBAKER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD L. LESLEY AVIONICS TECHNICIAN FIRST CLASS (E-6), NMCCA 201400271

MEMORANDUM * Plaintiff-appellant Mark Lopez filed suit, alleging claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and punitive damages. He appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company (“Jefferson Pilot”) on the bad faith and punitive damages claims. The facts are known to the parties and are not recounted here. To defeat Jefferson Pilot’s m

2024 IL App (2d) 220328 No. 2-22-0328 Opinion filed July 1, 2024 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge. I. Alan Stuart and G. Raleigh Hanbury (“Stuart”) filed this lawsuit-in the Superior Court of California against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM”) and Desert Hospital, Stuart’s employer, alleging breach of insurance contract, tortious breach of insurance contract, and loss of consortium. UNUM and Desert Hospital c

943 F.Supp. 1226 (1996) Sherry L. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. CV 96-6070 DDP. United States District Court, C.D. California. October 15, 1996. *1227 Michael J. Bidart, William M. Shernoff, Frank N. Darras, Theresa J. Barta, Shernoff Bidart & Darras, Claremont, CA, for Sherr

680 F.Supp.2d 942 (2010) Deborah Orlando COONEY, Plaintiff, v. Rhonda CASADY, Andrew Sosnowski, and Lesley Magnabosco, Defendants. No. 09 C 1920. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 21, 2010. Deborah Orlando Cooney, Chicago, IL, pro se. Russell C. Green, Law Offices of Russell Green, Thomas Carl Crooks, Attorney at Law, Rhon

652 F.Supp.2d 948 (2009) Deborah Orlando COONEY, Plaintiff, v. Rhonda CASADY, Andrew Sosnowski, and Lesley Magnabosco, Defendants. No. 09 C 1920. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 11, 2009. *950 Deborah Orlando Cooney, Chicago, IL, pro se. Russell C. Green, Law Offices of Russell Gree

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-IA-00824-SCT IN THE MATTER OF L.L.T., K.D.T., E.V.T., AND S.C.T.: LESLEY PRINCE v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/27/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN S. PRICE, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: PENNY B. LAWSON JOSEPH LANE CAMPBELL

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM”) appeals a bench trial judgment and consequent attorneys’ fee award in favor of John Dishman, an ERISA plan participant and benefits claimant. On cross-appeal, Dishman asserts that the district court erroneously dismissed as preempted his state law tort claim. We affirm in part and reverse in part. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

LANSING, Judge. Dawn Michelle Lesley was found guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating substances (DUI) and possession of marijuana. On appeal, she claims that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence, including the alleged marijuana, that the jury was not adequately instructed on the DUI charge, and that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict on the DUI offense.

Filed 10/13/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Amador) ---- In re C.L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court C097911 Law. AMADOR COUNTY DEPARTMENT (Super. Ct. No. 22DP00857) OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Pl

*49LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Dr. Hee Man Chie, an obstetrician-gynecologist, treated Vickie Lesley during her pregnancy in 1994 and 1995. After Lesley tested positive for HIV, Dr. Chie ended up referring her to another hospital that, in his judgment, was better qualified to handle deliveries by HIV-positive patients. The baby was delivered there, safely and without HIV infec

Loretta Lesley, along with Basil Hood, was arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit murder. Hood pled guilty. After trial on Loretta Lesley's charge, the jury returned a guilty verdict. Loretta Lesley has appealed to this Court alleging that: (1) the trial court erred by allowing the State to elicit testimony from a State's witness, Dale Lesley, regarding Loretta Lesley's alleged extramarital affairs in violation of Miss.R.Evid. 404(b); and (2) the trial court erred by overrulin

USCA11 Case: 23-12878 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 09/04/2026 Page: 1 of 35 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12878 ____________________ DR. LESLEY

ORDER The Opinion filed May 8, 2001, is withdrawn. A revised Opinion has been filed in its place. With the amendments made in the revised Opinion, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge T.G. Nelson and Judge Berzon deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Beezer so recommends. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc

[Cite as Brock v. Cobblestone Park Dev. Group, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-2949.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) AMIE BROCK, et al. C.A. No. 2023CA0064-M Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT