Cases

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-2404 _____________________________ LEROY FISHER, Petitioner, v. CANDACE ROBERTS and STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondents. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction. December 21, 2018 PER CURIAM. DENIED.

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant, Harold Leroy Fisher (Fisher), appeals the district court’s order revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years’ imprisonment. We affirm. Facts and Proceedings Below Following Fisher’s guilty plea to counts two and four of an indictment, which counts charged Fisher with transp

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: In sentencing a defendant who pleaded guilty to transporting a stolen truck in interstate commerce, the district court imposed a sentence of five years, which was within the statutory maximum, but in excess of the sentence of 30-37 months prescribed by the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court gave

Per Curiam. DENIED . Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendant Leroy Fisher appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, before Charles L. Brieant, Jr., Judge (sitting by designation), following his plea of guilty to a single count of bank larceny in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) (1976).1 Fisher

ORDER Federal inmate Harold Fisher, Jr., claims in this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 that he is confined unlawfully because the Bureau of Prisons miscalculated his federal sentence by denying him credit for time spent serving an unrelated state sentence. The district court denied the petition, and we affirm. On April 26, 2001, while serving federal sentences, Fisher escaped from federal prison. Two days later Arizona

ORDER Federal inmate Harold Fisher, Jr., claims in this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 that he is confined unlawfully because the Bureau of Prisons miscalculated his federal sentence by denying him credit for time spent serving an unrelated state sentence. The district court denied the petition, and we affirm. On April 26, 2001, while serving federal sentences, Fisher escaped from federal prison. Two days later Arizona

245 P.3d 671 (2010) 239 Or. App. 603 Randy D. FISHER, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Dennis Leroy Gordon, Petitioner, v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Respondent. A142990 (Control), A143153. Court of Appeals of Oregon. In A142990, on Respondent's Motion to Reconsider Order July 29, 2010.

328 F.Supp.2d 840 (2004) Tammy TUGGLES, Plaintiff, v. LEROY-SOMER, INC., Defendant. No. 01-1179-T-AN. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division. June 14, 2004. *841 Thomas L. Henderson, Esq. and O. John Norris, III, Esq., Lewis Fisher Henderson Claxton & Mulroy, LLP, Memphis, TN, for Defendant.

WENTWORTH, Judge. Appellant seeks review of three sentences to consecutive five year terms of imprisonment imposed after revocation of probation for three counts of grand theft. *858We find that the court erred by improperly departing from the recommended sentence established pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines. We therefore vacate appellant’s sentences and

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Mark Leroy Sparks was convicted and sentenced following a bench trial. We must decide whether his prior criminal record qualifies him as an Armed Career Criminal. This is contingent on whether either a prior attempted burglary or a theft from storage lockers qualifies as a violent felony under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). In respect to his current convicti

325 F.3d 1168 In re Dennis Leroy SAXMAN, Debtor,Dennis Leroy Saxman, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Educational Credit Management Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, andDepartment of Education, Defendant. No. 01-35620. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 8, 2003. Filed April 14, 2003.

14 F.3d 597NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.William James FISHER, Defendant-Appellant,and20.49 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Township 5, CravenCounty, Nort

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Beales, O’Brien and Raphael PUBLISHED Argued by teleconference LEROY VANMETER, JR. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0505-23-3 JUDGE STUART A. RAPHAEL FEBRUARY 27, 2024

Matter of Leroy v Brookdale Hosp. Med. Ctr. (2023 NY Slip Op 06428) Matter of Leroy v Brookdale Hosp. Med. Ctr. 2023 NY Slip Op 06428 Decided on December 14, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEROY MCGILL, No. 19-99002 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cv-01149- JJT DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; WALTER HENSLEY, Warden, Arizona OPINION Department of Corrections - Eyman Complex,

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: The district court awarded attorneys’ fees and costs exceeding $1,000,000 to plaintiffs, who it found “prevailed” in three separate actions and administrative proceedings to enforce the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973Z et seq. against the City of Houston. We disagree with significant portions of the district court’s legal anal

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 09 2020, 8:43 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

ACCEPTED 06-15-00002-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 8/5/2015 3:42:45 PM

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-15-00002-CR BRADLEY LEROY THOMPSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 115th District Court Upshur County, Texas Trial Court No. 16,737 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss