Cases

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Leonard Greger suffers from Posh-Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”) arising out of his experiences during his military service in Vietnam. In 1998, the Veterans Administration (“VA”) rated Greger as 30% disabled due to his PTSD diagnosis. According to Greger, his PTSD makes it difficult for him to get along with authority, causes him to be irritable, and contributes to his

OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. In April of 2002, David Bowen applied for disability insurance benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA). He claimed that he had become disabled due to both physical and mental conditions that rendered him incapable of working. During two hearings held before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), both B

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Everett Schuler appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability benefits. Because there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the administrative law judge (ALJ) that Schuler was not disabled during the time period in question, we affirm the decision of the district court. I.

ORDER Leonard Milton Ervin appeals pro se from a district court judgment that affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of his application for supplemental security income. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon review, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). An Administrative Law

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Heartfield, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits. The court heretofore ordered that this matter be referred to

DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge. The above matter comes to this Court following a Report-Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, filed on April.8, 2015, recommending that the Commissioner’s decision denying disability benefits be reversed, and the ease be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

487 F.Supp.2d 1333 (2007) Carol LEONARD, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 2:05CV499 FTM34SPC. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. March 30, 2007. Order Denying Motion to Alter or Amend May 1, 2007. *1334

750 F.Supp.2d 1341 (2010) Denise MOLINA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 8:07-cv-01485-T-24-TEM. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. August 9, 2010. *1342 Joel B. Fein, Law Office of Joel B. Fein, Brandon, FL, for Plaintiff. Susan R. Waldron, U.S. Attorney's Office

528 F.Supp.2d 17 (2007) Carmen M. CARRASCO, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil No. 06-1880 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 28, 2007. *18 Melba N. Rivera-Camacho, Melba N. Rivera Camacho & Assoc., Carolina, PR, for Plaintiff. Ginette L. Milanes, United States Att

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT December 19, 2011 No. 11-2220 KACEE LEE CHANDLER v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY, Appellant (Agency No. 10-cv-01047) Present: HARDIMAN, BARRY and VANANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 11-2220 ____________ KACEE LEE CHANDLER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Appellant ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 10-cv-01047) D

*237 OPINION DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge. In this appeal, we are asked once again to consider the substantive and procedural requirements of the Social Security Act and the regulations of the Social Security Administration. Specifically, we must evaluate the Commissioner’s dec

609 F.Supp.2d 607 (2009) David J. GASPARD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER. No. 1:07-CV-943. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. April 8, 2009. *609 Steven S. Packard of Packard Packard & LaPray, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff. Earnie Artsauna Joe of Social Security Administrati

SUMMARY ORDER Epifano Vasquez, pro se, appeals from an order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Leonard B. Sand, District Judge), granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss Vasquez’s action. For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, we affirm its judgment. See Vasquez v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 01 Civ. 8587, 2002 U.S. Dist

188 F.Supp.2d 424 (2002) Theresa STIEBERGER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 84 CIV. 1302(LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 7, 2002. *425 The Legal Aid Society, Scott A. Rosenberg, Esq., New York City, for Stieberger plaintiffs. U.S. Department of Justice, Civil

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, Tina Heard, Pearline Snow, and Carolyn Graham, filed this putative class action against the defendants — the United States Social Security Administration (“SSA”), the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), and the District of Columbia (“District”)— challengi

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Lance E. Stormo appeals from the district court’s 1 order affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Stormo’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. He asserts that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in failing to giv

MAGNUSON, District Judge. Appellant Sharon Hatcher appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security. We reverse and remand. BACKGROUND Appellant Sharon Hatcher (“Hatcher”) claims a disability resulting primarily from fibromyalgia. She applied for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits in September 1

270 F.Supp. 537 (1967) CONGRESS OF RACIAL EQUALITY (TARGET CITY PROJECT), A Maryland corporation (non-profit), on behalf of James E. Eastmond and many others similarly situated, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Secretary, Health, Education and Welfare, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission. Civ. No. 17866. United States District Court D. Maryland. June 20, 19

PER CURIAM: Leonard A. Boyles, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting in part and denying in part Boyles’s motion for summary judgment, affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s final decision with respect to Boyles’s date of continuous disability and denying Boyles’s motion to modify the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated b