⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lender L Wright”

Wright v. Youngpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2015-09-14 · Published · cited 48× · 297 Ga. 683; 777 S.E.2d 475; 2015 Ga. LEXIS 666
BENHAM, Justice. This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of appellant Willie Wright’s motion to vacate and set aside the October 26, 2010 final order and decree of divorce dissolving his marriage to appellee Kenya Young. 1 According to appellant, who is incarcerated and acting pro se in this appeal, he never rece
Wright v. Parishpublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 2023-06-15 · Published · cited 0× · 531 P.3d 1115
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49605 JAY F. WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Boise, April 2023 Term ) v. ) Opinion Filed: June 15, 2023
In re Wrightpublic domain
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2017-04-17 · Published · cited 1× · 566 B.R. 457; 77 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1025; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1064; 63 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 263
OPINION MARIAN F. HARRISON, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. Wayne L. Wright (“debtor”) filed this appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Chapter 7 Trustee’s (“trustee”) motion for authority to compromise personal injury and workers’ compensation claims. The bankruptcy court rejected the debtor’s argument that the trustee had abandoned those claims when the decree closing the case did not sp
Capel v. Wrightpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) BERTRAND CAPEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-0897 (ABJ) ) KAREN WRIGHT, )
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-06-13 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 Ohio 1996
[Cite as Forsythe Fin., L.L.C. v. Austin, 2022-Ohio-1996.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY FORSYTHE FINANCE, LLC, CASE NO. 2021-P-0090 Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the -v- Municipal Court, Ravenna Division BE
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005-02-15 · Published · cited 19× · 866 A.2d 698; 87 Conn. App. 474; 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 56
866 A.2d 698 (2005) 87 Conn.App. 474 AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER v. Gail M. PAGANO et al. No. 24447. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 15, 2004. Decided February 15, 2005. Stephen P. Wright, Milford, for the appellant (named defendant). *699 Peter A. Ventre, Hartford, fo
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-08-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ohio 2980
[Cite as Castle CFD Group, L.L.C. v. Kinney, 2023-Ohio-2980.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Castle CFD Group, LLC Court of Appeals No. L-22-1245 Appellee Trial Court No. CI0202003274 v. Kristian Kenney, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 229× · 778 F.3d 593; 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2027; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1441; 2015 WL 499571; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1942
ROVNER, Circuit Judge. The price a litigant pays for filing a flawed or unconvincing motion for summary judgment ordinarily is denial of the motion, not loss ,, of the case. But the district court in this case appears to have treated the lack of sufficient evidentiary support for the motion as a reason to enter summary judgment against the mov-ant. See Hotel 71 Mezz Lend
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-06-18 · Published · cited 2× · 246 N.E.3d 1039; 2024 Ohio 2340
[Cite as Wright-Patt Credit Union v. Nunley, 2024-Ohio-2340.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Wright-Patt Credit Union, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 23AP-509 (C.P.C. No. 23CV-1480) v. :
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 245 So. 3d 786
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PAUL WRIGHT and VANUSA WRIGHT, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, on behalf of the HOLDERS OF THE J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2007-CH5 ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-CH5, ESTATES OF STIRLING LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., and FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 669 F. App'x 311
ORDER Indicted for his role in a mortgage-fraud scheme, Harvey Wright pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1843, and was sentenced below the guidelines to 34 months’ imprisonment. Wright challenges his sentence on appeal, arguing that the district court misapplied the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and failed to adequately justify the length of the sentence. We affirm. We present
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-07-03 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 2577
[Cite as RSS UBSCM2018C9-OH IMG, L.L.C. v. 1360 E. Ninth CLE, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-2577.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA RSS UBSCM2018C9-OH IMG, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 112858 v. : 1360 EAST NINTH
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-02-21 · Published · cited 24× · 848 F.3d 1274; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2927; 2017 WL 677485
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Bruce Carlton Wright of conspiracy to commit bank fraud and of eleven counts of bank fraud arising from his participation in a scheme to submit false draw requests and invoices to obtain bank loans. The district court sentenced Wright to thirty-three months’ imprisonment and ordered him to pay $1,094,490.60 in restitution. Wright raises
In re Wrightpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 461 B.R. 757; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 5138; 2011 WL 6813179
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PAUL J. KILBURG, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the undersigned on November 17, 2011 on Debtors’ Motion to Show Cause for Violation of Terms of Chapter 13 Plan and for Sanctions. Debtors Alan and Kristine Wright were represented by Attorney Janet Hong. Creditor American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (AHMSI) was represented by Attorney C. Anthony Crnic. Afte
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 186 N.E.3d 323; 2022 Ohio 851
[Cite as 255 Fifth St. Holdings, L.L.C. v. 255 Fifth Ltd. Partnership, 2022-Ohio-851.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO 255 FIFTH STREET HOLDINGS, LLC, : APPEAL NO. C-210325 TRIAL NO. A-1607098 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs.
North Carolina Business Court · 2013-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2013 NCBC 30
Guilford Cnty. ex rel. Thigpen v. Lender Processing Servs., Inc., 2013 NCBC 30. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF GUILFORD 12 CVS 4531 GUILFORD COUNTY, ex rel. JEFF L. ) THIGPEN, GUILFORD COUNTY ) REGISTER OF DEEDS,
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · 2013-02-08 · Published · cited 0× · 28 Pa. D. & C.5th 95
HIGGINS, J., On March 14, 2007, the Plaintiff, Hospitality Associates of Tannersville, L.P. (hereinafter “Hospitality”), filed a complaint against the defendant, Aaron and Wright Technical Services and LandAmerica Assessment Coiporation (hereinafter “LandAmerica”). Hospitality seeks recovery of funds that were expended due to reliance on an allegedly erroneous property evaluation provided by LandAmerica to Marathon Asset Manageme
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 169 So. 3d 251; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9974; 2015 WL 4002319
PER CURIAM. We reverse the final judgment of foreclosure in favor of appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., because appellee did not prove that it had standing to bring this action. The original lender under the note and mortgage was Chase Bank, USA, N.A. There was no evidence that the note and mortgage were ever transferred from Chase Bank to JPMorgan Chas
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018-10-04 · Published · cited 1× · 194 A.3d 101; 456 N.J. Super. 328
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2358-15T3 CHARLES WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION October 4, 2018 v. APPELLATE DIVISION BANK OF
In re Wrightpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 509 B.R. 250; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 1979; 2014 WL 1689045
DECISION ON DISCHARGEABILITY OF POST-CONFIRMATION DEBT SARAH SHARER CURLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on a “Motion for Order Establishing that Country Mutual’s Claim for Post-Effective Date Attorneys’ Fees is Not Subject to Being Discharged Under Debtor’s Plan” (the “Motion”) filed on October 31, 2013 by Country Mutual Insurance Company (“Country”)