⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Leigh v. Sims”

Sims v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 262 So. 3d 747
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Sims v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 262 So. 3d 747
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Sims v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006-06-12 · Published · cited 9× · 631 S.E.2d 656; 280 Ga. 606; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1847; 2006 Ga. LEXIS 394
631 S.E.2d 656 (2006) 280 Ga. 606 SIMS v. The STATE. No. S06A0189. Supreme Court of Georgia. June 12, 2006. *658 Sanford Allen Wallack, Atlanta, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Bettieanne C. Hart, Peggy R. Katz, Asst. Dist. Attys., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Robin Joy Leigh, Ass
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
04/04/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 19, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LEIGH KATHERINE LITTLETON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Johnson County No. 18-CR-81 Lisa N. Rice, Judge _______
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2026-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2025-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
Rel: March 7, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM,
California Court of Appeal · 2007-06-28 · Published · cited 7× · 62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 83; 152 Cal. App. 4th 1143; 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1099
62 Cal.Rptr.3d 83 (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 1143 MILLER-LEIGH LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Shauna HENSON et al., Defendants and Appellants. Nos. C051652, C052206. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. June 28, 2007. *84 J. Michael Phelps, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Haycock
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 274 So. 3d 64
Judge Paula A. Brown This appeal arises out of a contract dispute between Appellant/Contractor, Construction Management Enterprises ("CME"), its bond surety, Hudson Insurance Group (collectively, "CME"), and Appellee/Sub-Contractor, Leigh of All Trades, L.L.C. d/b/a By Land or Sea Construction, LLC ("LSC"), regarding sums owed on a public works construction contract. CME appeals the district court's grant of partial summary judgment
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 274 So. 3d 64
Judge Paula A. Brown This appeal arises out of a contract dispute between Appellant/Contractor, Construction Management Enterprises ("CME"), its bond surety, Hudson Insurance Group (collectively, "CME"), and Appellee/Sub-Contractor, Leigh of All Trades, L.L.C. d/b/a By Land or Sea Construction, LLC ("LSC"), regarding sums owed on a public works construction contract. CME appeals the district court's grant of partial summary judgment
Washington Supreme Court · 2010-03-25 · Published · cited 76× · 168 Wash. 2d 444
Alexander, J. ¶1 This appeal requires us to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the trial court on remand abused its discretion in imposing a $15 per day penalty against the Office of Ron Sims, King County Executive, for its noncompliance with the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW.1 Although we previously entered a decision in this appeal, we later recalled our manda
Washington Supreme Court · 2010-03-25 · Published · cited 79× · 229 P.3d 735
229 P.3d 735 (2010) 168 Wash.2d 444 Armen YOUSOUFIAN, Respondent, v. The OFFICE OF RON SIMS, King County, Executive, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation; the King County Department of Finance, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation; and the King County Department of Stadium Administration, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation, Petitioners. No. 80081-2.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY 1999 SESSION FILED No. M1998-00758-CCA-R3-CD STATE OF TENNESSEE, * No. 01C01-9809-CR-003602000 February 25, Appellee, * Cecil Crowson, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003-01-06 · Published · cited 13× · 60 P.3d 667
60 P.3d 667 (2003) 114 Wash.App. 836 Armen YOUSOUFIAN, Appellant, v. The OFFICE OF RON SIMS, King County Executive, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation; The King County Department of Finance a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation; and The King County Department of Stadium Administration, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation, Respondents. No. 49701-4-I.
Sims v. Callahanpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959-05-21 · Published · cited 24× · 112 So. 2d 776; 269 Ala. 216; 1959 Ala. LEXIS 479
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 218 This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the verdict and judgment rendered in the case of J. H. Sims, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Alston Callahan, Defendant. The case was submitted to the jury on Count A, which claims damages sustained by the plaintiff as the result of fraud and deceit of the defendant. The defendant p
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014-11-12 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DIVISION PHIPPS, C. J., ELLINGTON, P. J., and MCMILLIAN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ November 12,
Sims v. Statepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988-02-02 · Published · cited 0× · 744 S.W.2d 568; 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 119; 1988 WL 6304
NUGENT, Judge. Defendant John Sims appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 27.26 motion confirming his conviction *569for first degree robbery and first degree assault. He was sentenced to twenty-five and fifteen years, respectively, the sentences to be served consecutively. We affirm. Because of the con
Sims v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 391 So. 2d 1107; 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1433
This is a consolidated appeal of six cases that were consolidated for trial at the request of the defendant. All bear a partial designation of CC-80, signifying that they were filed in the circuit court in 1980; they are individually and differentially designated as 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, and 258. The indictment in each case charges defendant with receiving, retaining, or disposing of stolen property, knowing that it was stolen or having reasonable grounds to believe it had b
Sims v. Chichesterpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 174 So. 495; 234 Ala. 305; 1937 Ala. LEXIS 212
Action of general assumpsit by the appellee against the appellant on account for money due and for work and labor done — common counts. The subject-matter of the action is commissions alleged to be due Chichester Co., a partnership composed of the plaintiff, C. H. Chichester, and his brother, the plaintiff *Page 306 claiming as the assignee of the partnership on its dissolution. The pleas were the general issue and special pleas setti
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
Rel: May 24, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 20
State v. Simspublic domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978-11-14 · Published · cited 117× · 248 S.E.2d 834; 162 W. Va. 212; 1978 W. Va. LEXIS 340
248 S.E.2d 834 (1978) STATE of West Virginia v. Paul Emerson SIMS. No. 13906. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. November 14, 1978. *836 Galbraith, Seibert, Kasserman, Farnsworth, Gillenwater & Glauser, Elba Gillenwater, Jr., Wheeling, O'Brien & Cassidy, Patrick S. Cassidy, Wheeling, for plaintiff-in-error.