Cases

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. *23 This case concerns the requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted before a claim under the "whistleblower" protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX"), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, can reach federal court. Plaintiff Barbara Newman ("Newman") c

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS § INC., § § No. 174, 2014 Plaintiff-Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Court of § Chancery of the State of v. § Delaware § SPANISH BROADCASTING §

12-2322-bk (L) In Re: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Barclays Capital, Inc. v. Giddens 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2012 4 5 (Argued: May 29, 2013 Decided: August 5, 2014) 6 Docket Nos. 12-2322-bk(L), 12-2933-bk(XAP) 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 IN RE: LEHMAN BROTH

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge. The appellant, Conway Hospital, Inc. (“Conway”), appeals from an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York disallowing its proof of claim. In 2012, Conway filed a proof of claim that arose from a 1998 debt service reserve fund agreement (the “1998 Agreement”) between Conway and Lehman Brothers S

445 B.R. 143 (2011) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al., Debtors. In re Lehman Brothers Inc., Debtor. Nos. 08-13555 (JMP), 08-01420 (JMP) SIPA. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. February 22, 2011. *148 Jones Day, Robert W. Gaffey, Esq., Jayant W. Tambe, Esq., William J. Hine, Esq., Tracy V. Schaffer, Esq., New Yo

433 B.R. 113 (2010) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-13555(JMP). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 20, 2010. *117 Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, Shai Y. Waisman, Esq., Mark Bernstein, Esq., New York, NY, Attorneys for Debtors. Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP, Paul J. Labov, Esq.

435 B.R. 122 (2010) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al., Debtors. Nos. 1:10-CV-4699-RJH, 1:10-CV-4700-RJH. United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 27, 2010. *126 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge. This case has a more complex posture than those a trial cou

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE COMPANY Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. N16C-01-221 PRW CCLD LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC. €\é\éS&/é\./%/&/\¢J\é Defendant. Submitted: July 20, 2016 Decided: August 24, 2016 MZ'BV_“RANDUM '- AND ORDF ."~S`~ Upon Defeha'ant, Lehman BrotherslHoldings, Inc'l ’s, Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay this Action, GRANTED. Donald E. Reid, Esquire, Karl G. Randall, Esquire, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LL

404 B.R. 752 (2009) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al. Debtors. No. 08-13555(JMP). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 12, 2009. *754 Richard P. Krasnow, Esq., Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession. J. Christopher Shore, Esq., Gerard Uzzi, Esq., White

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE COMPANY Plaintiff, LEHMAN BROTHERS ) ) ) ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N16C-01-221 PRW CCLD ) ) HOLDINGS INC. ) ) ) Defendant. Submitted: July 20, 2016 Decided: August 24, 2016 Corrected: September 9, 2016 MEMORANDUM OPIN!()N AND ORDER Upon Defena’ant, Lehman Brothers Holdings, lnc. ’s, Motion to Dz`smz`ss or, in the Alternative, to Stay this Action, GRANTED. Donald E. Reid, Esquire, Karl G. Randall, Esquire, Morris, Nichols

793 F.Supp.2d 1189 (2011) LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EVERGREEN MONEYSOURCE MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. C10-0172JLR. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. June 6, 2011. *1191 Christopher A. Pesch, Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, Chicago, IL, Jason L. Sanders, Locke Lord Bisse

PER CURIAM. William Matt, WT Matt Holding, LLC and WT Matt Development Corporation appeal from decisions by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), which dismissed their appeal from a bankruptcy court decision and denied rehearing. We dismiss the appeal by William Matt and reject the appeal by the corporate appellants as meritless. We also address a pending motion by the appellees.

SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND...571 A. SRM's Relationship with LBIE...571 B. Commencement of LBHI's Chapter 11 Proceeding and LBIE's Administration Proceeding...571 C. SRM Terminates its Contracts with LBIE...571 D. The SRM Proof of Claim...572 E. The LBIE S

SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is the motion (the "Motion"),1 dated November 21, 2017, of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. ("LBHI" or the "Plan Administrator"), as Plan Administrator under the Modified Third Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Its Affiliated Debtors (the "Plan"), pursuant to sections 105(a) and 1142(b) of title 11 of the

MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PLAN ADMINISTRATOR’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING CLAIM 67707 FILED BY SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the court is the Motion of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”), as Plan Administrator under the Modified Third Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and its Affiliated Deb

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION OVERRULING DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO CMBS CLAIMS AND DENYING REQUEST FOR SUBORDINATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 510(a)-(c) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This is an issue of first impression that turns on the meaning of the word “of’ in section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. It arises in the Objection to CMBS Claims and

SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *46Before the Court is Certain Defendants' Omnibus Motion to Transfer Venue, dated August 7, 2017 [Dkt. No. 457]1 (the "Omnibus Motion"), filed by the defendants listed on Exhibit A 2 annexed hereto (collectively, the "Defendants

Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION SUSTAINING OMNIBUS OBJECTIONS TO CLAIMS SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Even six years later, it is difficult to forget the media images from the days in late September 2008 of Lehman Brothers employees walking out of its gleaming corporate headquarters at 745 Seventh Avenue with their professional lives reduced to a few belongin

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered June 14, 1999, which granted defendant mortgage company’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated. Defendant provided plaintiff with a mortgage loan commitment letter on March 17, 1998 which, by its terms, provided that it would terminate 60 days later, on May 16, 1998. On April